re: Swedish study shows Vaccine Spike Protein Enters Nucleus

quote:

---

I don't have to answer the questions. This isn't a court room and I'm not on trial.

---

Summary will be fine. I mean is it Nobel like stuff or just a pre-print; or a guy walking down the street to his job? I mean, lots of people on here that post scientific links can at least have a discussion about its contents. I'm curious - really.

quote:

---

This isn't a court room and I'm not on trial.

---

But it is supposed to be a forum for informed discussion and debate.

quote:

---

Sure you are. Self published

---

You didn’t go to college or a graduate program, did you?

quote:

---

Oh you mean you dissertation?
Lol. Idjot.

---

Lol my god.

quote:

---

Oh you mean you dissertation?

---

Uhhh...no.

Oh my bad.

In an attempt to get your thread back on topic - here is a quote from the paper. Fairly easy to come away with the opinion that perhaps the vaccines are not as safe as we were led to believe. But hey, if you experts can argue with what Dr. Raszek said, please do share your knowledge.

quote:

---

This suggests that the use of antigenic epitopes
of the spike as a SARS–CoV–2 vaccine might be safer and more efficacious than the full–length spike. Taken together, we identified one of the potentially important mechanisms of SARS–CoV–2 suppression of the host adaptive immune machinery. Furthermore, our findings also imply a potential side effect of the full–length spike–based vaccine. This work will improve the understanding of COVID–19 pathogenesis and provide new strategies for designing more efficient and safer vaccines.

---

LINK

Dr. Raszek is quite good at presenting info and seems to be fair minded. He does a great job here with the immune escape theory of Geert Vanden Bossche.

quote:

---

I took the Pfizer but I'm old. I refuse to take the booster because I'm not taking a booster every 6 months.

---

You took a shot that gives 6 months "protection" but then refuse to take a booster even though the "pandemic" is still going? Seems illogical.

If covid is such a threat that you needed a vaccine, why would you not continue to ensure you are protected?

quote:

---

Fairly easy to come away with the opinion that perhaps the vaccines are not as safe as we were led to believe

---

I don't know how you can come to that conclusion, as there is nothing that the a full-length spike protein vaccine does that the virus itself doesn't do. If the spike protein subunits are inhibiting V(D)J recombination, that might indeed suggest that basing a vaccine on the spike protein, but it also has implications for long-term natural immunity. This is one particular aspect of the immunity discussion that I don't understand, as some aspects of this study suggest several things. First, it suggests several decades of evolution, as getting that degree of such specific immune evasion isn't something that is generally novel. Secondly, if the spike protein inhibits somatic recombination, that is a far more serious suggestion that affects so much more than any one single vaccine program, as the long-term sequelae of COVID itself would be immunodeficiency. Thirdly, I would have liked a little more discussion of subunit interaction, as they don't quantify the decrease in efficiency of NHEJ and HR repair discretely, though there is a decrease which they suggest is not significant. This would be a place for further study, as if the spike protein subunits also decrease efficiency of repair mechanisms, then there isn't a reason to focus vaccine design on antigenic epitopes associated with the region at all. Thankfully, without a direct method of infecting lymphocyte precursors, which the researchers admit, then I'm extremely skeptical that this is actually having an effect on somatic recombination, and that antibody response is preceding as it would with any other antigenic material.