Started By
Message

re: Stats don't indicate a good trend for America and your children

Posted on 8/21/25 at 10:25 pm to
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
22726 posts
Posted on 8/21/25 at 10:25 pm to
quote:

That was the standard for decades.

Yep, first half of last century but go check out the other housing related standards for that period.
Posted by Kingshakabooboo
Member since Nov 2012
1906 posts
Posted on 8/21/25 at 10:37 pm to
quote:

Most new homes are in the 1700 sq/ft and larger with a starting price over $350K. The new market for young couples isn't small starters homes,
quote:

hard to find a new home with 1200-1500 square feet and a basement for under $250K.
quote:

it was a brand new raised ranch
quote:

there were a lot of these size homes on the new house market


Seems like when the topic of young people starting out today having trouble buying homes, everyone starts throwing around stats on new houses. There may not be as many new homes being built and the ones that are may not be starter type homes but so what. What is wrong with buying an older home. There are plenty of those out there.
Posted by narddogg81
Vancouver
Member since Jan 2012
22098 posts
Posted on 8/21/25 at 11:00 pm to
I was married and owned my home by 30. Own my second home now
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
55739 posts
Posted on 8/21/25 at 11:20 pm to
quote:

You go from posting this:
quote:
Currently in Missouri it's hard to find a new home with 1200-1500 square feet and a basement for under $250K. They're hard to find because most builders aren't building new houses in the 1200-1500 sq/ft size.
To then posting this:
quote:
They want to buy a house but they want that $400-500K 2000 sq/ft home with a 30 year mortgage at 3% and 5% down......that's a problem. They might want to set their sites a little lower and work up to that 2000 sq/ft home after living in a more modest home for 5-7 years.


The starter home is already unreasonable at 1700 sqft for $350k.


Correct. My advice to young couples is to scale back their dream of buying the new 2000 sq/ft home for $400-500k and instead look for a home that was built 25-30 years ago that is in the 1350-1700 sq/ft size in the $200-300k price range. Live in that house for 5-10 years and then go get that bigger home.
Posted by dickkellog
little rock
Member since Dec 2024
2923 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 6:26 am to
my son married at 24 bought a house at 27 and made 160k last year. he was also the second strongest freshman on his high school football team day 1.

i missed the part were we raised kids collectively i really don't give a schit how your kids doing.
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
41547 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 6:35 am to
quote:

This is why we have been voting for a MAGA renaissance.


With those numbers and the crumbling financial state of the middle class over the last few decades, the MAGA Renaissance is probably about the tamest bit of socio-political upheaval we'll have in this century.
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
41547 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 6:41 am to
quote:

What is wrong with buying an older home. There are plenty of those out there.


What kind of neighborhoods are they in?

What kind of condition are they in?

How much do they sell for?

Theres fewer than 20,000 people in my town. A new DSLD shitbox is $300k and up.

My 80 year old house was $240k, and it needs a fricking shitload of work done to it.

I could put my zip on zillow and even the termite infested wooden houses on cinder blocks from mid-century are $200k.

People see new homes going for $300k and they automatically raise the prices on old shitboxes.
This post was edited on 8/22/25 at 6:42 am
Posted by funnystuff
Member since Nov 2012
9141 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:08 am to
quote:

it always has been to buy a house on a single income.
That’s just a flat out lie
Posted by lowhound
Effie
Member since Aug 2014
10368 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:18 am to
quote:

In 1950 there were more than 12 marriages per thousand people. Today there are barely five




That math is not mathing
Posted by thunderbird1100
GSU Eagles fan
Member since Oct 2007
72315 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:42 am to
Wife and I got married when we were 30/31, also bought house same year. Back in 2017

So glad we bought before the house (and interest rate) boom. We are sitting on a ton of equity but still waiting out this housing market to move to next house. Prices have definitely been coming down here in ATL area over the last couple months I've noticed. Interest rates on the way as well. I know we wont probably ever get spoiled again with the 2.375% interest rate we have right now
This post was edited on 8/22/25 at 7:49 am
Posted by LSUtoBOOT
Member since Aug 2012
20404 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:47 am to
quote:

Boomers will beat off to that. Nothing makes them prouder than buying a home for 60k that’s now worth 1 million. And they earned it from having an average job for 40 years and playing golf every weekend. Don’t you ever forget they were the real hard workers!

Serious question, did your parents cut you out of the will?
Posted by FredBear
Georgia
Member since Aug 2017
17419 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:53 am to
quote:

Nothing makes them prouder than buying a home for 60k that’s now worth 1 million.



I fail to see how that is a bad thing.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
115431 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 8:49 am to
You will own nothing
You will be happy
Posted by Snoopy04
Republic of Texas
Member since Aug 2015
3263 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 8:58 am to
Bought my house at 27
Married at 32
Had our first kid at 35 and wife stays home with the kiddo

We may not be cash rich, but i wouldn't trade my wife staying home with the kid for her working unless she was going to be making minimum $150K
Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
40237 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 9:06 am to
You can think all the NIMBY organizations for this. They've ensured their housing investment has gone up at the cost of reasonable priced housing...
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
77265 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 9:09 am to
quote:

Correct. My advice to young couples is to scale back their dream of buying the new 2000 sq/ft home for $400-500k and instead look for a home that was built 25-30 years ago that is in the 1350-1700 sq/ft size in the $200-300k price range. Live in that house for 5-10 years and then go get that bigger home.
*sigh*

This has been addressed time and time again.

Those homes generally do not exist anymore.

There is no glut of 25-30 year old 1350-1700 sqft homes out there.

That doesn’t even address the fact that $250-300k for a 1350-1700 sqft starter home is absolutely insane.

It is a starter home. You shouldn’t have to pay $250-300k for a starter home in a non-crime ridden area.
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
63417 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 9:11 am to
quote:

If you're pissed off about this, just wait until you figure out it's boomers selling you $1,000 Taylor Swift tickets while they got to see Led Zeppelin at MSG for $10.50.


$7.50 with no extra fees for me in 1977 at the Assembly Center.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
77265 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 9:12 am to
quote:

Those houses in the 60s and 70s were 1,200 sqft.
No one is building 1200 sqft houses anymore.

And this isn’t a situation of younger generations designing these homes.

It is the DR Horton’s of the world. People looking for starter homes are stuck with those.

And before you say, “well, buy an older home and fix it up”, those homes are being bought by developers at a premium, who then tear them down to build another generic monstrosity, at least where I live.
This post was edited on 8/22/25 at 9:17 am
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
38357 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 9:15 am to
Can't you go back and find one of the other "Boomers' fault" threads about this and attach it? We have been through this ad nauseum.
Posted by olgoi khorkhoi
priapism survivor
Member since May 2011
16768 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 9:39 am to
3 things most responsible for housing crisis, in no particular order:

1. letting in tens of millions of non citizens

2. Blackrocks of the world buying homes as investments

3. Devaluing the currency / money printer go brr
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram