- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 5/5/22 at 6:59 pm to boogiewoogie1978
quote:
If this had legs Ted Cruz or someone would have ran with it.
The swamp includes RINOs. Cruz talks, but does nothing more.
Posted on 5/5/22 at 6:59 pm to roadGator
You want to know why we will never be unified in this country, see a couple of responses. How in the frick do some people justify their ideology when facts are presented that are directly opposed to their beliefs. frick em
Posted on 5/5/22 at 7:00 pm to Tigers0918
Funny how you’re unwilling to believe a summary of verified data, which is open source in its collection and methodology, but perfectly willing to accept at face value the utterances of politicians who are self interested in the result.
It must be nice being stupid. Or at least easier.
It must be nice being stupid. Or at least easier.
Posted on 5/5/22 at 7:10 pm to Tigers0918
quote:
I think the first one yes, when he blackmailed a foreign head of state to find dirt on a political opponent, that is unforgivable for a politician to me.
The Human Condition exhibited in this post is why wars are fought. It's either profound example of Confirmation Bias from the "useful idiot" group or a straight up conspiratorial strategy from a top tier political operative/wordsmith. Don't really matter which, as talk is never what solves these differences when the talklers hold polar and uncommon informational bases. Like the Zuckerberg-paid 'Mules' in those videos, that is not my opinion, just the historical record.
Here we go again. Strap in. Humanity moving up the hard way.
Posted on 5/5/22 at 7:13 pm to Tigers0918
quote:
ah yes, if a picture on the internet or a movie says it, it must be true.
You sound scared.
Which freedom are your most afraid of losing?
a) mask for the rest of your life
b) identity as a double spiritual being
c) will be denied access to menstrual products
Our new “disinformation czar” said it, so it must be true!!!
Posted on 5/5/22 at 7:17 pm to Tigers0918
quote:
But that should be decided by the courts, not politicians.

Posted on 5/5/22 at 7:18 pm to Tigers0918
quote:
I have not followed the Steele dossier enough to have an opinion on it at all. I
Posted on 5/5/22 at 7:56 pm to boogiewoogie1978
quote:
If this had legs Ted Cruz or someone would have ran with it.
I'm not holding my breath, but wouldn't he be wild if this is what they've all been waiting for.
Maybe video evidence is what it takes to convince retards. Also, Elon Musk might let those videos spread on his new social media company.
Thatd be wild.
Posted on 5/5/22 at 8:03 pm to Wednesday
quote:
Funny how you’re unwilling to believe a summary of verified data, which is open source in its collection and methodology, but perfectly willing to accept at face value the utterances of politicians who are self interested in the result.
It must be nice being stupid. Or at least easier.
Here's the thing, until both the national MSM and justice system comes out verifying voter fraud or any other number of things (vaccine injuries, Covid origins, spygate, the open border, etc.), the other side will simply ignore whatever evidence you have, altogether whole cloth just say its not true.
That being the case, I don't know what the answer is. They don't care. If CNN or WaPo don't confirm it, it doesn't exist.
Posted on 5/6/22 at 8:32 am to TrueTiger
quote:
thanks for making my point
Wow how dishonest. It said "failed to present any evidence of misconduct" etc.
They were given the chance to present their evidence. It's just that their evidence was comprised of conspiracy theory ramblings and hearsay.
Posted on 5/6/22 at 8:39 am to GumboPot
quote:
Yeah, Democrat Party operatives stole the election in 6 key counties.
No doubt. The American people were robbed. Plain as day. Only a complete idiot would disagree.
That's the basis of my argument that the USA is Already Conquered.
Posted on 5/6/22 at 8:41 am to roadGator
I can't beleive how out of touch with reality some people are. You can tell when people get their information from one and only one source. It's amazing how media and tech builds their minds.
Posted on 5/6/22 at 8:50 am to Tigers0918
quote:
I mean, its so funny to realize just how many people just literally believe anything they see on the internet as long as it fits their narrative.
That works both ways, dude. Let's have a bipartisan investigation.
One side says, "Most secure election ever. There is no evidence to the contrary."
The other side says, "The election was stolen, and here's the evidence."
What do we do, now? Is cheating in an election okay if it's your side that benefits? I suppose it will be until the side that is damaged by the cheating has had enough and fights back.
I can say this. The opportunity was there to steal the election. If the 2020 election wasn't stolen, then the 2022 or 2024 election will be if we don't tighten up our voting procedures.
The way they gathered this evidence by tracking cell phones can only be used once. Next time the mules will be told to leave the cell phones at home.
Posted on 5/6/22 at 9:23 am to FlexDawg
I can't believe you guys are still sending election fraudsters money for things ..... This right here is why my family bought dwac at IPO and we all sold by the next day after the pop.....just free cash from idiots who love to be scammed.
Posted on 5/6/22 at 9:25 am to oklahogjr
Catturd retweeted some clip from Tucker where this is alleged.
quote:
Catturd ™ Retweeted
Liz Harrington
@realLizUSA
·
11h
The average ballot trafficker made 38 TRIPS to drop boxes.
And it's on tape!
Posted on 5/6/22 at 9:26 am to HappySpud234
quote:
Wow how dishonest. It said "failed to present any evidence of misconduct"
well if there was no evidence presented, then the court did not examine any evidence
what I said is still true
Posted on 5/6/22 at 9:28 am to TrueTiger
quote:
well if there was no evidence presented, then the court did not examine any evidence
what I said is still true
It didn't say there was no evidence presented. Just that no evidence showing fraud was presented....that's an important difference
Popular
Back to top


2







