re: SIAP (this is intriguing), Trump retruthed Dr. Jan Halper-Hayes interview.

quote:

---

Trump has turned into jjdoc, and has put out a shite ton of utter nonsense, so the simple fact he retruthed it doesn't mean to me what it means to you.

---

And it's hard to say if he even believes it, but his priority is red meat for the base. I would imagine if anybody ever pinned him down in an interview on some stuff he'd quickly shift to Gumbo's line "well, it's interesting, I never said it was true, but they said it was, don't you think that's interesting?"

Thank you for presenting. Hopefully everyone forwards it to everyone they know while also asking their "everyone you know" to do the same.

Chain mail letter on steroids!!

quote:

---

If any of this Q stuff turns out to be true, this board will experience a melt the likes of which the Rant has never seen. It’ll be something we’ll be telling our grandchildren about.

---

SlowFloPro will literally implode

quote:

---

This vid will provide "some" answers, if you open to them.

I doubt anyone here will watch, but WTH?

---

I just finished - thanx for the link.

I found out things that I had not known before, such as the origin of Q itself, and more insight into that first trip of Trump's presidency.

To be honest, it sounds like the script to some "mission impossible' film.

HOWEVER - I have been following political events ever since I first learned the truth about our war in Vietnam. That opened my eyes that there are truly treasonous people who reach high office. (I had always hated LBJ, but I never even thought that HE could be so evil as to commit us to a WAR just to be known as a 'wartime POTUS')

So now, no depth of evil motive is beyond my suspicions

quote:

---

My dad’s life has been ruined by this type of QAnon stuff

---

What a loser he must be

Please note that I say all the following as someone who believes the election was stolen in GA, PA, MI and AZ.

quote:

---

I just showing the history. Of the 3 heard, he won 2. The rest was never heard because he was winning.

---

How do we know they wouldn't have heard a case addressing detailed government captured data points proving that election results were tampered with? That data was never shown and the cases never filed in places like GA, WI and AZ that at the time might've been receptive to hearing substantive evidence presented in a timely and coherent manner.

quote:

---

Thus to remove him would require “extra judicial” actions, otherwise known as a military coup?


Correct. Do you see another option?

---

Yes, at the time substantive evidence presented coherently would've likely resulted in the SC having to address the situation.

If they ignored it then you would've seen J6 go a very different direction or a mainstream secession movement look at a separation between blue and red.

quote:

---

Incorrect. Lack of Standing is not hearing it. Lack of standing was saying Trump had no right to be in court.

Has nothing to do with the evidence.

---

We don't know what would or wouldn't have been heard in state or federal court because according to this narrative the prime evidence was never disclosed. The cases that were presented were haphazard and backed by mediocre evidence which allowed the judges cover to throw them out without there being an uproar that would've seen the appeals process play out.

quote:

---

With evidence presented, people will have a choice to make.

---

Why give Biden a full presidency? What objective does allowing him to attain an illegitimate term serve?

quote:

---

The answer is in your own remarks. They did not hear it, now they are forced to.

---

Forced to hear what? Data that shows that the election was stolen presented in cases that don't directly have anything to do (at least purportedly) with the 2020 election? They can just ignore it or exclude it as you claim they would've in 2020, with the difference being in 2020 Trump still controlled the levers of government until 1/6 and would've been able to avoid that power being wielded against him and his supporters.

This brilliant plan you are suggesting handed a group which is clearly guilty of bribery, possible treason and likely stealing an election the military, the DOJ, the police, the national guard, the IC and the pseudo-state run media. Given their legal exposure do you really think they will hesitate to use them against conservatives when the rubber starts to meet the road?

In your mind what did this alleged top secret plan accomplish in return for all of that?

quote:

---

I will buy every Trumper I've called retarded a brand new car the day after Trump and Space Force overturn the 2020 election and DT is installed as the rightful POTUS.

---

Mega, MAGA Trumper here. The election was stolen, but space force is going to install him as rightful potus TONIGHT by 7pm eastern time. Bookmark this post David_DJS, and prepare to melt when it happens.

quote:

---

Trump will be reinstated by the military.

---

Other than as a ludicrous joke, I have never heard that discussed anywhere.

Do I believe the election was invalid?? = you damned right I do. I always have - I even PREDICTED it before the election - as early as mid summer when the "mass mailing of ballots' was presented I predicted the precise scenario that would take place on Election Night. (only it went on longer than I thought it would.)

Now - what to do about it?? before the election I didn't think there was any solution except to try and PREVENT it - which I viewed as impossible.

SO - you ask me if I believe it after I predicted what would happen down to the hours?? you damned right I do.

I want to believe

The Scotty Mar videos can be entertaining and informative.

Here are 2 of the latest. All with a musical theme and under 10 minutes.

American Pie

Cypress Hill - When the shite goes down