0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Should everyone have the right to vote?
Posted on 11/8/26 at 8:27 am to DingLeeBerry
Posted on 11/8/26 at 8:27 am to DingLeeBerry
No.
The Founding Fathers had it right. People with a vested interest in society, who actually contribute, should be the ones who vote.
The Founding Fathers had it right. People with a vested interest in society, who actually contribute, should be the ones who vote.
Posted on 11/8/26 at 8:31 am to DingLeeBerry
No one who doesn’t pay taxes (excluding retirees and military disabled) should be allowed to vote.
Posted on 11/8/26 at 8:32 am to Nosevens
(no message)
This post was edited on 11/8/26 at 5:11 pm
Posted on 11/8/26 at 8:39 am to DingLeeBerry
quote:
Should everyone have the right to vote?
No
Posted on 11/8/26 at 8:39 am to The Torch
quote:
No one who doesn’t pay taxes (excluding retirees and military disabled) should be allowed to vote.
What if they have a lot of bankruptcies?
Posted on 11/8/26 at 8:40 am to 4cubbies
quote:
Keep your fingers crossed for big boy if you don’t mind.
I will, and I’m sure he will do wonderfully.
Posted on 11/8/26 at 8:41 am to 4cubbies
quote:
Inmates aren’t allowed to vote.
Before they were arrested they voted democratic as many times as they could.
Posted on 11/8/26 at 8:45 am to JiminyCricket
quote:
I’ve long felt that people who don’t contribute shouldn’t get a vote. Why should someone who is a net taker and contributes nothing get the opportunity to vote to take more from the people that do?
I'worn mywself out trying to find new ways to say this
any able bodied person living off welfare should not be allowed to vote.
We should have some community service jobs for able-bodied persons to perform in return for their 'welfare' contributions.
There at lots of things needed down - especially downtown slums.
Posted on 11/8/26 at 8:47 am to MoarKilometers
quote:
What if they have a lot of bankruptcies?
What if they had more successes?
Tell us why you believe people should not take advantage of stupid laws.
Posted on 11/8/26 at 8:58 am to DingLeeBerry
quote:
I don’t believe a white guy who would leave his 6 year old in line at target at 1:00 am for Pokemon cards should have a say, just like I don’t think a black woman who would starve her child to death should either. They are both unfit.
We watched the President of the United States tell lies for two months about winning re-election when he actually lost it, and then after losing all the legal avenues to test the votes (because they were accurate), tried to remain in power through the use of force and violence which saw over 100 police officers get injured and some that participated died because of Trump's prompting.
Anyone who voted for Trump again after that is unfit to vote in America.
Posted on 11/8/26 at 8:59 am to DingLeeBerry
Nope.
Posted on 11/8/26 at 9:10 am to RohanGonzales
quote:
Tell us why you believe people should not take advantage of stupid laws.
Tell us why you think non taxpayers shouldn't be able to vote, but you support one being president
Posted on 11/8/26 at 9:11 am to Ben Rumson
quote:You didn’t just that! Who was the young that was shot? One officer died of a stroke unrelated. Ok. You have 99 to name. Go!
tried to remain in power through the use of force and violence which saw over 100 police officers get injured and some that participated died because of Trump's prompting.
Posted on 11/8/26 at 9:29 am to Nosevens
You must own land/house
You must pay taxes
You must be male
You must pay taxes
You must be male
Posted on 11/8/26 at 9:29 am to MoarKilometers
quote:
Tell us why you think non taxpayers shouldn't be able to vote, but you support one being president
Maybe it should be revised to taxpayers and/or documented job creators.
Posted on 11/8/26 at 9:37 am to stelly1025
no one under the age of 25. it's science (don't all communists love science?): your prefrontal cortex isn't fully developed until then.
no women unless they own land or pay taxes.
no one who doesn't pay income tax and/or owns land.
no state employees in state elections, federal workers in federal elections, etc. No one who's receives government welfare programs. all of the above are the literal definition of 'conflict of interest.' bureacrats must be restricted and this includes neocons within the MIC. bombing brown people oversees to the other side can import them by the millions is over.
no trans people, and if you commit to trans 'therapy' e.g., chemical and/or surgical, you forfeit your right to own firearms. you are a statistical danger to the public.
no communists, no muslims, no hindus. all have proven in their voting numbers that they cannot be objective in governance, and islam is a disease that must be relegated to the dustbin of history in the west and back the dustbin that is the middle east.
no foreigners, no anchor babies. anyone in the last 20 years who was born in another country is out, along with their descendants. they're all going back anyway.
the 19th amendment has ruined this republic. if women can't help but to commit serial homicide on their own children because they're just girls, they can't vote unless they meet the strict requirements above. we are seeing today why, for all of human history, women weren't allowed to govern en masse without eventual disastrous results. it's all a farce anyway. no man with testosterone looks at a woman as a fearless leader. the experiment has failed and women have used up all of the male's goodwill. you did it to yourselves. it's a biological thing for women to go along to get along because it's a survival mechanism. no leader can behave this way.
if you don't own land or pay taxes or receive a taxpayer income or taxpayer welfare you don't vote because you can't be objective. you'll always vote for the party promising you more free stuff and more income by the enslaved 50 percent who have to pay taxes, and the fact is, we can't afford it anymore. daddy's wallet is closed.
there's too many people voting who have no business being allowed to, and aside from the studies coming out on how stupid so many young people are because of a 3rd world education and the abysmal knowledge they and so many have of American civics, we see the supporting anecdotal 'man on the street' interviews of the abject retards that surround us and vote.
over 25 male foundational White and Black Americans, along with male tejanos in the southwest, all who pay taxes and or own land, and this country would be humming a la 1950s in less than a decade. we built this country, no one else, and we and only we can save it.
no women unless they own land or pay taxes.
no one who doesn't pay income tax and/or owns land.
no state employees in state elections, federal workers in federal elections, etc. No one who's receives government welfare programs. all of the above are the literal definition of 'conflict of interest.' bureacrats must be restricted and this includes neocons within the MIC. bombing brown people oversees to the other side can import them by the millions is over.
no trans people, and if you commit to trans 'therapy' e.g., chemical and/or surgical, you forfeit your right to own firearms. you are a statistical danger to the public.
no communists, no muslims, no hindus. all have proven in their voting numbers that they cannot be objective in governance, and islam is a disease that must be relegated to the dustbin of history in the west and back the dustbin that is the middle east.
no foreigners, no anchor babies. anyone in the last 20 years who was born in another country is out, along with their descendants. they're all going back anyway.
the 19th amendment has ruined this republic. if women can't help but to commit serial homicide on their own children because they're just girls, they can't vote unless they meet the strict requirements above. we are seeing today why, for all of human history, women weren't allowed to govern en masse without eventual disastrous results. it's all a farce anyway. no man with testosterone looks at a woman as a fearless leader. the experiment has failed and women have used up all of the male's goodwill. you did it to yourselves. it's a biological thing for women to go along to get along because it's a survival mechanism. no leader can behave this way.
if you don't own land or pay taxes or receive a taxpayer income or taxpayer welfare you don't vote because you can't be objective. you'll always vote for the party promising you more free stuff and more income by the enslaved 50 percent who have to pay taxes, and the fact is, we can't afford it anymore. daddy's wallet is closed.
there's too many people voting who have no business being allowed to, and aside from the studies coming out on how stupid so many young people are because of a 3rd world education and the abysmal knowledge they and so many have of American civics, we see the supporting anecdotal 'man on the street' interviews of the abject retards that surround us and vote.
over 25 male foundational White and Black Americans, along with male tejanos in the southwest, all who pay taxes and or own land, and this country would be humming a la 1950s in less than a decade. we built this country, no one else, and we and only we can save it.
Posted on 11/8/26 at 9:58 am to DingLeeBerry
IMO you must own real property to vote.
Posted on 11/8/26 at 1:56 pm to mudshuvl05
That’s a good list. I’d add in those with military service as long as they’ve been discharged honorably.
Posted on 11/8/26 at 3:43 pm to DingLeeBerry
The system is working as designed.
Sounds like you want to implement precogs (from the movie minority report). Good luck with that. You can’t prevent somebody from voting before they commit a crime - only after if it is warranted.
Your aptitude tests sound like some Jim Crow level BS to prevent people from voting.
Sounds like you want to implement precogs (from the movie minority report). Good luck with that. You can’t prevent somebody from voting before they commit a crime - only after if it is warranted.
Your aptitude tests sound like some Jim Crow level BS to prevent people from voting.
Posted on 11/8/26 at 3:45 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Inmates aren’t allowed to vote.
That isn't necessarily the case.
OPP inmates awaiting trial can because they haven't been convicted yet. Mississippi allows inmates to vote by absentee ballot if their offense wasn't a disqualifying one.
A few states like Maine allow inmates to vote without restrictions.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News