- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Shiloh Hendrix found guilty of disorderly conduct for calling a sex criminal the n-word
Posted on 7/24/26 at 9:18 am to uggabugga
Posted on 7/24/26 at 9:18 am to uggabugga
If this is the definition and ruling on a disorderly conviction, then every video we have seen of an arrest of the ghetto class would result in the same charge/conviction.... instead, most get probation or charges dropped
0
Posted on 7/24/26 at 9:21 am to Hester Carries
nailed it. That is almost a clinical diagnosis of SFP's PB posting style.
He does not simply defend the leftist position. He first builds an elaborate procedural or semantic maze so he can defend it while insisting he is merely correcting everyone’s unsophisticated / backwards reasoning. The destination is predetermined. He just wants credit for taking the scenic route.
Posted on 7/24/26 at 9:23 am to uggabugga
What are the odds this black gentleman gets charged for saying it too, multiple times? Same Minnesota law must apply, equal justice right ? I’m sure that gentleman already gets her tax dollars through his hard earned grift of America
Posted on 7/24/26 at 9:31 am to TROLA
quote:
I can’t imagine this’ll hold if she can appeal.
Normally I would agree, but MN seems to be obsessed with relieving themselves of the perceived sin of being white by knighting for anyone black or brown regardless of the context nor crime.
Posted on 7/24/26 at 9:32 am to Klark Kent
quote:
That is almost a clinical diagnosis of SFP's PB posting style. He does not simply defend the leftist position. He first builds an elaborate procedural or semantic maze so he can defend it while insisting he is merely correcting everyone’s unsophisticated / backwards reasoning. The destination is predetermined. He just wants credit for taking the scenic route.
He (as many others) must justify their advanced degrees bc they lack the compensation and authority that they thought they’d be entitled too.
quote:
Dammit I paid for my education so you need to respect and pay attention to me!
This post was edited on 7/24/26 at 9:36 am
Posted on 7/24/26 at 9:33 am to medium_okra
quote:
I'd never make it in MN.
They'd bring back the death penalty for me.
Posted on 7/24/26 at 9:35 am to PuertoRicanBlaze
The ACLU SHOULD (I emphasize SHOULD) be all over this, but we know the answer to that.
Posted on 7/24/26 at 9:45 am to LSUDVM1999
This is one example of where Go Fund Me is a good thing. I hope she moves to a more common sense state to raise her child, and uses her voice to trash Rochester, MN for this. I hope she also successfully has this overturned in higher courts.
Posted on 7/24/26 at 9:50 am to uggabugga
This will never stand up on appeal.
A) consent
B) 1A
He wants to sue her civilly, he can. The state cannot criminally sanction her for her speech.
Period.
A) consent
B) 1A
He wants to sue her civilly, he can. The state cannot criminally sanction her for her speech.
Period.
Posted on 7/24/26 at 9:57 am to W2NOMO
quote:
ETA: I can’t see this not being overturned.
Oh you clearly don't follow how insanely "disorderly conduct" is generally applied in this country. It has turned into some BS catch all that often times finds loopholes to criminalize protected conduct without explicitly admitting to doing so.
Posted on 7/24/26 at 10:00 am to NIH
quote:
Tboy, VOR, Decatur, RFK, Byron Bojangles, cubbies, and Hank are saying this is a damn fine prosecution and an example of justice
This prosecution is BS, but until more disorderly conduct statues are legally challenged, this will continue to happen. This is less about MN and racism, and more about the lack of police/judicial accountability in this country.
Posted on 7/24/26 at 10:01 am to uggabugga
Im guessing this isnt america
Posted on 7/24/26 at 10:01 am to udtiger
quote:
He wants to sue her civilly, he can. The state cannot criminally sanction her for her speech.
Period.
Didn’t they just do exactly that? The fact that she is going to have to appeal at all is beyond a miscarriage of justice.
Posted on 7/24/26 at 10:03 am to onmymedicalgrind
This isn’t the first court decision that considered use of the N-word as fighting words.
Posted on 7/24/26 at 10:03 am to uggabugga
She will win her appeal. Hopefully the judge and prosecutor are disbarred.
Posted on 7/24/26 at 10:04 am to Decatur
quote:
This isn’t the first court decision that considered use of the N-word as fighting words.
You just knew a freedom hating leftist would be here to defend this.
Posted on 7/24/26 at 10:04 am to onmymedicalgrind
I agree that disorderly conduct itself is often abused
Posted on 7/24/26 at 10:05 am to udtiger
quote:
This will never stand up on appeal.
A) consent
B) 1A
It will until someone challenges the statute. Its written very vaguely:
quote:
(3) engages in offensive, obscene, abusive, boisterous, or noisy conduct or in offensive, obscene, or abusive language tending reasonably to arouse alarm, anger, or resentment in others.
This must be more narrowly tailored to not violate 1A.
Posted on 7/24/26 at 10:07 am to Decatur
Fighting words in the context of a civil lawsuit where you provoke someone and they commit an intentional tort. I doubt there is criminal jurisprudence effectively criminalizing the word.
This post was edited on 7/24/26 at 10:09 am
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News