Started By
Message

re: Shiloh Hendrix found guilty of disorderly conduct for calling a sex criminal the n-word

Posted on 7/24/26 at 10:07 am to
Posted by uggabugga
Maryland
Member since Aug 2024
5534 posts
Posted on 7/24/26 at 10:07 am to
quote:

This isn’t the first court decision that considered use of the N-word as fighting words.


why would the sex pervert beg her repeatedly to use such a word?
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
67304 posts
Posted on 7/24/26 at 10:08 am to
quote:

It will until someone challenges the statute. Its written very vaguely:


This certainly appears to be the case to overturn such a ridiculously vague statute. They really overplayed their hand with this one. She clearly was not the aggressor in that video.

ETA: I doubt even SCOTUS judge Jumanji could get this one wrong.
This post was edited on 7/24/26 at 10:09 am
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
32992 posts
Posted on 7/24/26 at 10:09 am to
I’m not familiar enough with the matter to know what civil lawsuit you are referencing. I thought she was charged under MN criminal law.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
124266 posts
Posted on 7/24/26 at 10:13 am to
I’m talking nation wide. Fighting words are usually only relevant in the context of a civil lawsuit. Not in a criminal proceeding.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
67304 posts
Posted on 7/24/26 at 10:14 am to
quote:

We all need to have some empathy. The strong black guy was terrified of a little white woman calling him a word.


So terrified that he fled the country and wasn't even available to testify against her in this trial.
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
32992 posts
Posted on 7/24/26 at 10:18 am to
The First Amendment could be a defense to this crime if the exchange does not amount to fighting words.
Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
41585 posts
Posted on 7/24/26 at 10:19 am to
quote:

Shiloh Hendrix found guilty of disorderly conduct for calling a sex criminal the n-word



Insanity. It’s not even a bad word
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
83257 posts
Posted on 7/24/26 at 10:23 am to
Apparently in Minnesota there is a right to not be offended.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
116665 posts
Posted on 7/24/26 at 10:26 am to
quote:

quote:
He wants to sue her civilly, he can. The state cannot criminally sanction her for her speech.

Period.


Didn’t they just do exactly that? The fact that she is going to have to appeal at all is beyond a miscarriage of justice.


I am not denying that is what happened. I am saying she's gonna have a sweet 1983 action when this bullshite is ultimately tossed.
Posted by GetMeOutOfHere
Member since Aug 2018
1166 posts
Posted on 7/24/26 at 10:34 am to
Her lawyer went off for 8 minutes about all the BS during the trial:

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


Fitting closing statement at the end.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
67304 posts
Posted on 7/24/26 at 10:57 am to
Attorney nailed it. This is clearly getting overturned on appeal.
Posted by uggabugga
Maryland
Member since Aug 2024
5534 posts
Posted on 7/24/26 at 10:59 am to
Quality lawyering. I'm glad the Givesendgo funds were wisely used.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
67304 posts
Posted on 7/24/26 at 11:03 am to
quote:

Quality lawyering. I'm glad the Givesendgo funds were wisely used.


Yeah they definitely found a guy willing to fight for free speech to the very end.
Posted by BR Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2004
4752 posts
Posted on 7/24/26 at 11:29 am to
quote:

Would be nice to see who was on the jury.


Seems like this would be a case for a trial by judge rather than by a jury. A biased judge would probably end up with the same result but you at least have the chance that they will follow the law rather than just being emotionally manipulated.
Posted by andwesway
Zachary, LA
Member since Jun 2016
3660 posts
Posted on 7/24/26 at 11:46 am to
How is this disorderly conduct?
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
32992 posts
Posted on 7/24/26 at 12:05 pm to
This Connecticut Supreme Court case seems relatively on point if anyone would like to see a court go through the analysis.

LINK
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
27517 posts
Posted on 7/24/26 at 12:24 pm to
When does the trial for theft begin? Aren't the parents the ones responsible when their child breaks the law? And the he can't claim he didn't know this was an issue because there is enough history of it that the kid had a tracker on him because of it.
Posted by G2160
houston
Member since May 2013
2552 posts
Posted on 7/24/26 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

This prosecution is BS, but until more disorderly conduct statues are legally challenged, this will continue to happen. This is less about MN and racism, and more about the lack of police/judicial accountability in this country.


No, it is exactly about minnesota.

How many disorderly conduct cases can you recall being brought against anti-ICE protestors shouting at law enforcement?

Unequal application of the law is 100% intentional.
This post was edited on 7/24/26 at 12:33 pm
Posted by jrobic4
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
13559 posts
Posted on 7/24/26 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

Is free speech dead?

quote:

Minnesota


It is there
Posted by onmymedicalgrind
Nunya
Member since Dec 2012
12420 posts
Posted on 7/24/26 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

No, it is exactly about minnesota.

No, people get slapped with BS disorderly conduct charges all across America for nonsense. It just rarely becomes news like this. Wake up and try to break out of your algorithm.
This post was edited on 7/24/26 at 1:49 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram