- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SDNY judge modifies TRO - SecTreas can access systems, DOGE still can't
Posted on 2/11/25 at 1:45 pm to udtiger
Posted on 2/11/25 at 1:45 pm to udtiger
quote:
Newsflash - Biden appointee confirmed in November 2024 (thanks Mitch).
I knew all those last minute appointments were going to be a problem. 147 of them IIRC. Mitch is a scoundrel.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 1:46 pm to Nurbis
quote:
How is it decided who gets on the approved list?
Duh, federal judges are now hiring IT personnel.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 1:47 pm to udtiger
quote:
He can allow contractors on the approved list PRIOR TO 1/20/25 to access the systems.
So only contractors authorized by the Biden administration? To audit what is essentially what happened during the Biden administration?
This scumbag just proved that this is totally f*cking political and that he is nothing but a politicized piece of filth.
Since when do judges get to say who is authorized to conduct an audit on an executive branch department?
This post was edited on 2/11/25 at 1:49 pm
Posted on 2/11/25 at 1:52 pm to FightinTigersDammit
quote:
Judge is ordering destruction of federal documents?
The order required destruction of the copies of materials that were downloaded
quote:Court listener
ordered to direct any person prohibited above from having access to such information, records and systems but who has had access to such information, records, and systems since January 20, 2025, to immediately destroy any and all copies of material downloaded from the Treasury Department's records and systems, if any
Posted on 2/11/25 at 1:55 pm to dukkbill
FYI, this judge is female (lots of references to "he")
Jeanette Vargas
Other judge was the "duty" judge. Beyond the TRO, he has no other role in this matter.
Jeanette Vargas
Other judge was the "duty" judge. Beyond the TRO, he has no other role in this matter.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 1:55 pm to udtiger
quote:
He can allow contractors on the approved list PRIOR TO 1/20/25 to access the systems.
Would be absolutely awesome if the name Harry Bolz was on that list.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 1:58 pm to udtiger
How fast can Trump get this to the Court of Appeal?
Posted on 2/11/25 at 1:58 pm to udtiger
Trump should do an Oval Office Prime Time Presser, read off the findings thus far and then say he is not abiding by the judges order and is preemptively pardoning the DOGE team from anything.
Would make the left go absolutely ape shite.
Would make the left go absolutely ape shite.
This post was edited on 2/11/25 at 1:59 pm
Posted on 2/11/25 at 1:59 pm to rumproast
quote:
How fast can Trump get this to the Court of Appeal?
Not as fast as he can ignore it.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 2:02 pm to rumproast
quote:
How fast can Trump get this to the Court of Appeal?
The full hearing is scheduled for Feb 14 with a joint letter due on Feb 13. An intetlocutory appeal in the order could be taken after the entry of the judges ruling on the hearing and issuance of (or maintenance of the order. Court listener hearing order
Posted on 2/11/25 at 2:05 pm to fwtex
quote:
Sec of Treasury should report he has looked at the data and his personal review has indicated critical data anomalies and has ordered all payments to stop until an immediate audit has been completed.
Let's see the judge try to insert himself into the official role and decisions of a confirmed Secretary. Make this Judge be seen for the political fool he is.
I am modifying my previous strategy for Sec. Of Treasury. State there are critical data anomalies that are a national threat and he has ordered all payments to stop until an audit is completed. When the Judge comes back asking about the national threat the SEC of Treas pulls out his wild card, "it is a matter above your security clearance".
Posted on 2/11/25 at 2:09 pm to dukkbill
quote:
The order required destruction of the copies of materials that were downloaded
They need to make copies because the crats are deleting files.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 2:15 pm to udtiger
Judges can't micromanage other branches. Tell this guy to suck all the dicks.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 2:20 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
There is no known or imagined scenario where a federal judge could stipulate which contractors an executive department could hire.
You have way underestimated the number of activist judges suffering from acute TDS who just know they are seated well above POTUS, they are judges, and better than all others.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 2:22 pm to Flats
quote:
How fast can Trump get this to the Court of Appeal?
Not as fast as he can ignore it.
If he ignores the order then evidence becomes tainted. Maybe tainted enough to not be allowed into court if/when some of the people responsible for the fraud and shite are prosecuted. Do you really want some scumbag deep state turd to get off on a technicality just because Trump did not wait until this can be brought up in court?
Posted on 2/11/25 at 2:32 pm to Tandemjay
quote:
The order required destruction of the copies of materials that were downloaded
They need to make copies because the crats are deleting files.
If it was ever on a computer then it can be recreated. I do not know how to do it, but I guarantee you that Elon Musk and the people who work for him know how to do it.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 6:50 pm to udtiger
Posted on 2/11/25 at 6:54 pm to Kjnstkmn
An unelected judge should not have this power.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 6:59 pm to udtiger
quote:
He can allow contractors on the approved list PRIOR TO 1/20/25 to access the systems.
The Judge’s injunction power does not allow this. This is a gross departure from normal judicial procedure and an affront to the Constitution.
Popular
Back to top
