- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
SCOTUS to hear AR-15 case
Posted on 6/30/26 at 11:53 am
Posted on 6/30/26 at 11:53 am
Posted on 6/30/26 at 11:55 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Why are 2 of them in that painting wearing masks.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 11:56 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Part of me hopes they lean towards banning all firearms outside of the weapons that were available when the 2A was drafted.......we might as well get ready to rumble.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 11:56 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Now, THIS one will be interesting. “Shall not be infringed” is pretty darn clear. At worst, this should be a 6-3 split for the ability to possess these guns.
If they rule against it, then you know the Globalists are in the henhouse and expect Dems to begin gun bans. It’ll be the beginning of the end, or at least time for “We the People” to end the tyrannical government.
If they rule against it, then you know the Globalists are in the henhouse and expect Dems to begin gun bans. It’ll be the beginning of the end, or at least time for “We the People” to end the tyrannical government.
This post was edited on 6/30/26 at 11:57 am
Posted on 6/30/26 at 11:56 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
The 1 thing this version of SCOTUS will be known (and currently celebrated) for is more clearly defining the 2nd Amendment
Many cases about 2A have generally been kicked down the road until this version of the Court
Many cases about 2A have generally been kicked down the road until this version of the Court
This post was edited on 6/30/26 at 11:58 am
Posted on 6/30/26 at 11:57 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
DC vs Heller deemed the AR-15 a commonly used/owned weapon. More people own an AR than any other weapon design.
ETA: Before some dumbass says that people shouldn't own a weapon of war, the AR-15 has never once been used in a military skirmish, war or anything else.
ETA: Before some dumbass says that people shouldn't own a weapon of war, the AR-15 has never once been used in a military skirmish, war or anything else.
This post was edited on 6/30/26 at 11:59 am
Posted on 6/30/26 at 11:57 am to Placekicker
quote:
Now, THIS one will be interesting. “Shall not be infringed” is pretty darn clear. At worst, this should be a 6-3 split for the ability to possess these guns.
I say allow that Son of the Revolution blood to course through your body, we're gonna need all we can muster before this shite show is over.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 11:58 am to bbvdd
quote:
DC vs Heller deemed the AR-15 a commonly used/owned weapon. More people own an AR than any other weapon design.
Never seen one, what do they look like?
Posted on 6/30/26 at 11:58 am to Bass Tiger
This won’t affect anyone here since we all lost our firearms in the 2014 TD Regatta race. What a tragedy.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 12:00 pm to sledgehammer
quote:
This won’t affect anyone here since we all lost our firearms in the 2014 TD Regatta race. What a tragedy.
The Day that Freedom died.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 12:03 pm to sledgehammer
quote:
This won’t affect anyone here since we all lost our firearms in the 2014 TD Regatta race. What a tragedy.
Boat accidents, house fires, tornadoes, loaned to a friend, etc.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 12:07 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
PLEASE LET THOMAS WRITE THE OPINION ON THIS
Posted on 6/30/26 at 12:07 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
My ar15’s have birthright citizenship as they were all made here in the US so they’re legal. So frick off.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 12:08 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
There's nothing to "hear" or contemplate.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 12:09 pm to OldSouth
quote:
Is this today?
No they just have said they are taking the case. Now we wait.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 12:11 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
My AR identifies as a Daisy Red Ryder BB gun.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 12:13 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
The liberal talking point will always be "You don't need that to hunt"
Anyone who reads the constitution recognizes that the citizens that drafted the constitution were not looking to protect a man's right to hunt, they were aiming to protect a man's right to live.
"well they didnt know there would be tanks, and automatic machine guns, and grenades"
Their intent is clear, citizen protection from a tyrannical government... which means anything and everything should be legal. If the government can have one then I should be able to have one to use against said government
Anyone who reads the constitution recognizes that the citizens that drafted the constitution were not looking to protect a man's right to hunt, they were aiming to protect a man's right to live.
"well they didnt know there would be tanks, and automatic machine guns, and grenades"
Their intent is clear, citizen protection from a tyrannical government... which means anything and everything should be legal. If the government can have one then I should be able to have one to use against said government
Posted on 6/30/26 at 12:13 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
KBJ is already writing her 12 page word salad dissent on how these were never meant to be included as arms in the 2A, because racism or something.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 12:18 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
FINALLY
What's funny is all these newfound textualists who are celebrating the birthright citizenship ruling will turn around and scream "But the founders never could have envisioned an AR-15!!!"
What's funny is all these newfound textualists who are celebrating the birthright citizenship ruling will turn around and scream "But the founders never could have envisioned an AR-15!!!"
Popular
Back to top


17








