Started By
Message

re: Rittenhouse lawyer says he believes jury is deadlocked at 6-6 split

Posted on 11/18/21 at 7:39 pm to
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
25893 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 7:39 pm to
I don’t think an attorney would comment on that.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
70478 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 7:40 pm to
quote:

That’s a hung jury and a mistrial


I don’t practice criminal law, but wouldn’t that also result in an acquittal? The prosecution only gets one bite at the apple. If they f$&k up and the defendant walks, they don’t get to appeal.
Posted by sledgehammer
SWLA
Member since Oct 2020
7196 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 7:40 pm to
Unbelievable for a case that should’ve never went to court in the first place.
“When tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty.” -Thomas Jefferson
Posted by Issa Honk
Let's Go Brandon
Member since Apr 2021
1338 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 7:40 pm to
quote:

Stupid or intimidated?

I don't understand the mindset of destroying an innocent young man's life because you are a little scared

How could you live with yourself?
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
48410 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 7:42 pm to
quote:

How can 6 people possibly be that fricking stupid


Jury intimidation. MSNBC tried to doxx them yesterday.
Posted by BurntOrangeMan
Dallas TX
Member since May 2021
5628 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 7:42 pm to
quote:

What’s the track record on this Jack fella being correct with all his “sources”??




Recently, pretty damn good.
Posted by cssamerican
Member since Mar 2011
8218 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 7:43 pm to
And people are the reason why people like myself were pissed that this could even get to court.
Posted by evil cockroach
27.98N // 86.92E
Member since Nov 2007
9172 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 7:43 pm to
How many more days will the judge let them deliberate?
Posted by jatilen
Member since May 2020
13608 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 7:43 pm to
Stop posting Posobiec clickbait...here's his source which claims someone "heard" the defense lawyers:


They didn't even talk to his lawyers as Posobiec claimed. Posobiec is trolling for clicks again.
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
57778 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 7:43 pm to
quote:

I don’t think an attorney would comment on that.




One wouldn't think Richards or Chirafisi would be saying such things. I'm sure they didn't say it to Posobeic directly.

Someone else tweeted this afternoon that Richards said he was more stressed today.
Posted by Caraway Rye
Member since Oct 2021
5108 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 7:43 pm to
quote:

Those in this thread that are shocked need to be more aware of …people



Any Democrat being in office anywhere at all is all you need to know about people.

We doomed
Posted by BennyAndTheInkJets
Middle of a layover
Member since Nov 2010
5854 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 7:43 pm to
If it is true (which I highly doubt), I have to assume it favors Rittenhouse because a retrial would require new jury members and the prosecution wouldn't be able to slip different video evidence again.

Considering the threats even at the judge, clearly the court would make even more efforts to withhold the identities of the jurors. Also the intimidation tactics require funding for those involved, so who knows the appetite for increased funding since anonymity will make it more difficult.

Granted I don't know Wisconsin law on retrials, states can be idiosyncratic with their rules since there is the long held question of the constitutionality of retrials to begin with, albeit in practice it hasn't mattered.
This post was edited on 11/18/21 at 7:45 pm
Posted by 4LSU2
Member since Dec 2009
38083 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 7:44 pm to
quote:

I don't understand the mindset of destroying an innocent young man's life because you are a little scared


Yet another piece of their narrative to completely destruct the 2A. Once innocent citizens are scared to defend themselves, it is game/set/match.
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
36755 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 7:44 pm to
I find it pretty questionable, this supposed comment by defense counsel. Much about it doesn't fit the typical circumstances. For defense counsel to make such a definitive statement, it would necessarily require that he had an insider info conversation with someone who has first hand knowledge of the goings on in jury room, most likely a bailiff guarding the door. That's the only way. Which I highly doubt if that were the case that counsel would advertise it in such an open way for all to see, particularly the judge. Mark me down for "anti this".
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 7:44 pm to
I’m hoping Jack is full of shite as he is like a third of the time, but he has been scathingly accurate.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
110956 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 7:45 pm to
quote:

That’s a hung jury and a mistrial.


Those are two different things.
Posted by michael corleone
baton rouge
Member since Jun 2005
6552 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 7:45 pm to
I don’t think this way, but it’s liberal Yankee land


6 idiots bought into “you can’t claim self defense when you show up with a gun”.
Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
19305 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 7:45 pm to
You say lawless I a dumbed down society
Posted by MrLSU
Yellowstone, Val d'isere
Member since Jan 2004
29741 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 7:46 pm to
Newsmax also broke the Jurors being deadlocked and that there were four females who wanted to vote guilty earlier today.
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
57778 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 7:47 pm to
quote:

Jack is full of shite as he is like a third of the time, but he has been scathingly accurate.



Unreal.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram