- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:55 am to Jbird
quote:
Replying to @chicagotribune So detained and held for a whole 6 hours for obstruction but not charged? Sounds like she got a sweetheart deal.
Wait a minute.. she wasn't charged??? Why the F not? That is what emboldens them to do this shite. Zero consequences.
Yet another example of "if the roles were reversed.. it would have been definitely different"
Posted on 6/4/26 at 10:04 am to djmed
Ackshually... It's the people that "observed" her exposed buttocks who should receive the compensation for emotional damages.
Posted on 6/4/26 at 10:06 am to djmed
Good thing she can’t get any of that weaponization fund money…
Posted on 6/4/26 at 10:16 am to djmed
Seems the general public was the aggrieved party in this grotesque exposure.
Posted on 6/4/26 at 10:41 am to djmed
FA'd because she believed there was something so magical about her that she wouldn't have to FO.
Is now crying because she did indeed FO.
I voted for this.
Is now crying because she did indeed FO.
I voted for this.
Posted on 6/4/26 at 10:42 am to djmed
Some people should have no rights to public exposure. Or yoga pants
Popular
Back to top


0







