- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Right on cue - MN - Police shoot and kill woman attempting to run over agent
Posted on 1/7/26 at 6:31 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 1/7/26 at 6:31 pm to hawgfaninc
1
Posted on 1/7/26 at 6:32 pm to nealnan8
quote:.
I just saw the video, and there is no way that ICE agent needed to save how own life by shooting that women. It's a close call either way, but the women was trying to drive away with the agent's left leg somewhat lined up with her left side headlight. It may be legal, but his life was not in danger.
Is there anyone fluent in retard that can translate this abomination of the English language?
Posted on 1/7/26 at 6:33 pm to lsuguy84
Posted on 1/7/26 at 6:34 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 1/7/26 at 6:34 pm to hawgfaninc
Average Reddit mod.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 6:35 pm to hawgfaninc
In the video… “ she was doing what was right fighting for her immigrant neighbors”
Well there goes the official observer line of BS. Also she was breaking the law and tried to leave the scene of her arrest by running through a LEO,
So clearly doing what was right.
Well there goes the official observer line of BS. Also she was breaking the law and tried to leave the scene of her arrest by running through a LEO,
So clearly doing what was right.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 6:35 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 1/7/26 at 6:35 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 1/7/26 at 6:36 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 1/7/26 at 6:36 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Probably still justified shooting, buy clearly a lie to say he was acting in defense of others or that he was on the bumper.
You could just make everyone’s life easier and have posted “I’m stupid” instead.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 6:36 pm to GeorgeTheGreek
quote:
That video has about 5 pixels.
5 Pixels of TRUTH...
Posted on 1/7/26 at 6:39 pm to M3From225
quote:
If you champion someone’s death, you’re a loser regardless of political views.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 6:40 pm to Jorts R Us
Posted on 1/7/26 at 6:44 pm to nealnan8
quote:
just saw the video, and there is no way that ICE agent needed to save how own life by shooting that women. It's a close call either way, but the women was trying to drive away with the agent's left leg somewhat lined up with her left side headlight. It may be legal, but his life was not in danger.
You can argue that he may not have needed to fire but he was justified if he thought he was in danger
Guy was standing in front of a car when she refused to stop, reversed, went forward into him
Posted on 1/7/26 at 6:46 pm to dgnx6
quote:
You know, you are generally always wrong with your first assumption.
Very bad at this. Maybe stop saying shite with authority until you actually know shite.
Just a tip.
Thanks for the tip, but "generally always wrong?" How can someone be usually and always wrong?
Edify me though, what else was I wrong about?
In this case, the first still I saw had the front wheel turned away from the agents.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 6:46 pm to Jorts R Us
Posted on 1/7/26 at 6:47 pm to nealnan8
quote:
I just saw the video, and there is no way that ICE agent needed to save how own life by shooting that women. It's a close call either way, but the women was trying to drive away with the agent's left leg somewhat lined up with her left side headlight. It may be legal, but his life was not in danger.
Legitimate question… are you retarded?
Posted on 1/7/26 at 6:52 pm to CAD703X
When do the pallets of bricks start showing up?
Posted on 1/7/26 at 6:53 pm to nealnan8
quote:
I just saw the video, and there is no way that ICE agent needed to save how own life by shooting that women.
He doesn’t need to fear loss of life. The law includes fear of serious bodily injury.
Officers are not duty bound to accept being maimed.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 6:55 pm to TimeOutdoors
I was busy all dad and totally missed this story. I just saw the video of the shooting.
Classic case of frick around followed swiftly by find out.
Classic case of frick around followed swiftly by find out.
Page 24 of 36
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News