re: Report: Hamas notified Columbia student Mahmoud Kahlil of 10/7 attack beforehand

quote:

---

it doesn't cover all forms of expression, and certain speech types are not protected, including incitement to violence, defamation, obscenity, and true threats.

---

None of those apply to giving racially/ethnically sensitive material to people in that group.

We have a direct case on this. It's one of the ACLU's seminal cases.

quote:

---

Before the Skokie Affair, Frank Collin and his neo-Nazi group, the NSPA, would regularly hold demonstrations in Marquette Park, where the NSPA was headquartered. However, the Chicago authorities would eventually block these plans by requiring the NSPA to post a $350,000 public safety insurance bond and by banning political demonstrations in Marquette Park.[9][10] While Collin filed a lawsuit against the City of Chicago for a violation of his first amendment rights, he realized that this case would get tied up in the courts for far longer than he was willing to wait to begin marching again.[11]

On October 4, 1976, Collin sent out letters to the park districts of the North Shore suburbs of Chicago, requesting permits for the NSPA to hold a white power demonstration.[11][12] While some suburbs chose to ignore their letter, Skokie—home to a significant number of Jewish people, many of them survivors of the Holocaust[13]—chose to respond.[14] At first, the Skokie mayor and Village Council intended to allow the NSPA to demonstrate; the village's tactic was to ignore them, in order to give the NSPA as little publicity as possible.[15][16] The Jewish community found this unacceptable and held meetings throughout the month of April to discuss the matter. The mayor and the Village Council heard their concerns and on April 27, 1977, ordered village attorney, Harvey Schwartz, to seek an injunction.[16]

In addition to filing an injunction, the Village of Skokie passed three ordinances on May 2, 1977 in an attempt to prevent all future events that would be like the march which the NSPA had requested permission to stage.[17] One states that people could not wear military-style uniforms during demonstrations.[18][19] The two other ordinances prohibited the distribution of material containing hate speech and a required a $350,000 insurance bond to hold a demonstration.[19][20] These ordinances rendered it impossible for the NSPA to be able to hold the event.[18]

---

Spoiler alert: the Nazis were allowed to march

quote:

---

The trespassing? Probably.

---

Which some were arrested for.

Others were for obstructing.

Same as J6.


So now, are you going to say what was done to J6 was wrong? Or are you going to stick with they committed crimes?

Which would mean some of the demonstrators at Columbia also committed crimes.


It’s also a felony to incite a riot. Going around telling people trying to incite people to do harm against a person or property.


You should know that Mr lawman.

quote:

---

Hamas would not divulge that information.

---

Do they plan their attacks on group chats with random people in it?

quote:

---

Do they plan their attacks on group chats with random people in it?

---

quote:

---

On information and belief,

quote:

---

In legal terms, this is the opposite of "smoking gun evidence"

---

---

”I have absolutely no evidence of this, but someone told me that it is true.”

quote:

---

Do they plan their attacks on group chats with random people in it?

---

No, but they did have hundreds of 85 IQ foot soldiers participating in the attack with cellphones.

Not hard to imagine someone with connection to those rapists getting notified right before.

quote:

---

We are back!!” could be referring to anything and could reasonably be bad timing.

---

Very true but the various so called organic student groups are tactics no different than our USAID color revolutions. These are being funded by Iran, Qatar and Muslim Brotherhood in an attempt to impact public perception in the short-run and US foreign policy in the long-run.

quote:

---

Let’s test your theory. Go to mcneese, find a black history class, and go in there saying crush the blacks.

---

It would be free speech under the First.

and it would probably send emotional children into hysterics.

Take the L dude

quote:

---

bullshite.

---

You're as bad as what you accuse Leftists of being...just believing what you want regardless of evidence.