Started By
Message

re: Red States Pressured To Expand Medicaid As Care Contrasts Emerge

Posted on 8/10/14 at 7:30 pm to
Posted by redandright
Member since Jun 2011
9790 posts
Posted on 8/10/14 at 7:30 pm to
quote:

If the fed gov changes the percentage they'll pay, it won't be pretty in some states.


Would anybody conduct a business deal this way?
Any governor who signed on to this deal with the Feds, is not serving the people of his state well.

Unless he thinks the Feds will somehow bail his state out. Kind of a "too big to fail" state government style.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
43970 posts
Posted on 8/10/14 at 7:51 pm to
quote:

frick no. They better not. They'd be fricking their states in the long run.

Better to let the poor people die in the streets, right? They're just leeches anyway.




Can't contribute anything of substance?
Posted by SmackoverHawg
Member since Oct 2011
30971 posts
Posted on 8/10/14 at 8:25 pm to
quote:

that are economically dying. The lack of healthcare in the hollers is a symptom of economic uselessness. Subsidizing unproductive areas with massive amounts of medicaid spending is not good policy, and does not encourage holler people to move where their labor is needed.


Medicaid sucks. That's why nobody takes it. shite, here in Arkansas Medicaid pays HALF what Medicare does and Medicare Pays HALF of what BCBS does. And they limit visits to twelve a year. They say they'll extend benefits but they never do. And you're getting people in your office you don't want in your office.

More people on Medicaid is not a win. It's the worst fricking outcome.
Posted by davesdawgs
Georgia - Class of '75
Member since Oct 2008
20307 posts
Posted on 8/10/14 at 8:48 pm to
quote:

A report last week from The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation-funded Urban Institute said states that haven’t expanded will “miss out” on more than $420 billion in federal dollars between now and 2022. I


Since the federal government is running a seemingly insurmountable deficit, it would seem that it is non-compliant states who are actually serious about reducing the deficit.
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
37196 posts
Posted on 8/10/14 at 9:13 pm to
quote:

Medicaid sucks. That's why nobody takes it.
In your office;true. But half pay is better than no pay for hospital EDs and inpatients if they were no pay(self-pay) with zero collections prior to expansion.
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
52921 posts
Posted on 8/10/14 at 9:17 pm to
quote:

Better to let the poor people die in the streets, right?


So wait....they were dying the streets everywhere before the expansion?
Posted by inelishaitrust
Oxford, MS
Member since Jan 2008
26176 posts
Posted on 8/10/14 at 9:24 pm to
quote:

frick no. They better not. They'd be fricking their states in the long run.


How so?
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
73256 posts
Posted on 8/10/14 at 9:49 pm to
quote:

How so?
It may not seem like a lot to you, but 10% of the tab will have to be paid by the state. In a state like Mississippi, with all the health problems, that is an extremely large amount of money.

And, like others have said, medicaid is not a good insurance to have. Most medicaid patients do not have primary care doctors has it is a nightmare trying to find one.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
125696 posts
Posted on 8/10/14 at 9:51 pm to
quote:

In your office;true. But half pay is better than no pay for hospital EDs and inpatients if they were no pay(self-pay) with zero collections prior to expansion.


This assumes that people only use medical services when they need to. That's an obviously false assumption. "Free" healthcare drives up utilization. If a person uses the ED 4 times for "half pay" instead of using it one time with no pay, the hospital is worse off from a profit standpoint in the first instance.
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36132 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 12:51 am to
quote:


Is medicaid really the best we can offer poor people?


Of course not. We should just get rid of medicaid and let the free market take care of it. That means they won't actually have any health insurance but frick em, we got ours, they're poor who gives a shite?

This post was edited on 8/11/14 at 12:52 am
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36132 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 12:52 am to
quote:

frick no. They better not. They'd be fricking their states in the long run.


Poor people going to doctors isn't definitely something to be afraid of. We shouldn't stand for it. Really what has this world come to?
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
112824 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 6:23 am to
You know how I know you're stupid?
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
52398 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 7:20 am to
quote:

I did notice that Mr. Fetter said that emergency department visits increased. It seems that Medicaid beneficiaries still resort to the emergency room for their primary care despite Obamacare sponsors claims they would be reduced



I work in healthcare. Emergency rooms have been treated as primary care long before ACA came along and that's not going to change. It's just a part of the culture of the people that are using ER's for primary care and that's not going to change. All this thing will be is another way to expand a government handout to people taking advantage of the system. And guess who gets to pay for it???
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 7:41 am to
I laughed at this before and will again. Red states just intentionally making things worse for their residents with their full support.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
82220 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 7:43 am to
quote:

We should just get rid of medicaid and let the free market take care of it.
Most intelligent thin you have ever said.


Ever
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
85406 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 7:45 am to
So cute.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
112824 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 8:21 am to
quote:

I laughed at this before and will again. Red states just intentionally making things worse for their residents with their full support.


Funny you use the word "residents" instead of "taxpayers."
Posted by bamafan1001
Member since Jun 2011
15783 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 8:47 am to
quote:

Of course not. We should just get rid of medicaid and let the free market take care of it. That means they won't actually have any health insurance but frick em, we got ours, they're poor who gives a shite?


I know right. All those poor people in Central America and Africa. We should pay for them too!

It isn't fair that America has good healthcare while the rest of the world doesn't!
This post was edited on 8/11/14 at 8:50 am
Posted by ALTiger
Alabama
Member since Nov 2009
3123 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 8:56 am to
quote:

I laughed at this before and will again. Red states just intentionally making things worse for their residents with their full support.


These Red states WILL have the last laugh, and not at the expense of "people dying in the streets", either.
Posted by Ralph_Wiggum
Sugarland
Member since Jul 2005
11033 posts
Posted on 8/11/14 at 8:57 am to
The survival of the Republic depends on an educated and healthy populace. People who are educated and healthy and have opportunity to succeed on the basis of their merits are the foundation of a strong and healthy republic.

So provide health care and education and opportunity and the Republic will thrive.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram