- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 3/1/18 at 9:15 am to Powerman
Sure!
We need more heroin.
We need more heroin.
Posted on 3/1/18 at 9:15 am to Powerman
quote:
Everyone backs off of gun control with the following trade off: The war on drugs ends and all drugs are decriminalized.
You get to keep your current gun rights with no more restrictions so long as drug use is no longer a criminal activity.
Where is the bad part to this?
Posted on 3/1/18 at 9:16 am to scrooster
quote:
even the smoke show Gal Gadot super model types ... but they are all AIDs infested.
I'd be willing to roll the dice
Posted on 3/1/18 at 9:16 am to CoachChappy
quote:
That should be added to the next meme war. Get lefties to snort sevin dust.
Sevin Dust > Tide Pods
Posted on 3/1/18 at 9:18 am to Powerman
quote:
It means if you want to snort a line of coke or whatever your drug of choice is you won't be put in jail over it.
Seems a bit overly simplistic and not completely thought out Re: "all drugs." In other words, it's all but a completely meaningless hypothetical/proposal.
Posted on 3/1/18 at 9:18 am to Centinel
quote:
if you're a druggie, no taxpayer funded healthcare
Why just that risky behavior?
Why not if you eat too much sugar, or get too many speeding tickets, or engage in polyamory?
If you're going to exclude one risky behavior, why not exclude them all? Because you engage in others that you don't want to lose YOUR access to taxpayer funded healthcare over?
Posted on 3/1/18 at 9:18 am to Powerman
quote:
You get to keep your current gun rights with no more restrictions so long as drug use is no longer a criminal activity.
I get to keep them anyway, it's called the 2nd amendment!!
Posted on 3/1/18 at 9:19 am to Powerman
quote:
Everyone backs off of gun control with the following trade off: The war on drugs ends and all drugs are decriminalized.
How is this a trade exactly? You’re just giving me 2 things I want!
Posted on 3/1/18 at 9:20 am to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
Why just that risky behavior?
Why not if you eat too much sugar, or get too many speeding tickets, or engage in polyamory?
If you're going to exclude one risky behavior, why not exclude them all? Because you engage in others that you don't want to lose YOUR access to taxpayer funded healthcare over?
Pump the brakes there bubba. I was just talking about this subject. If it were up to me, ALL federal funding of any type of healthcare would be axed.
Posted on 3/1/18 at 9:21 am to Powerman
Great idea but it would never happen.
I'd go a step further and have all petty drug offenders released from jail/prison.
I'd go a step further and have all petty drug offenders released from jail/prison.
Posted on 3/1/18 at 9:21 am to Powerman
quote:why is the 2A the only right that requires “a deal”? One does not bargain for rights.
would you take this deal?
quote:Sure. And we can allow free speech *if* people don’t say stupid isht. Obviously, the OP precludes any right to free speech. We’re off to a great start.
You get to keep your current gun rights with no more restrictions so long as drug use is no longer a criminal activity.
Posted on 3/1/18 at 9:22 am to Powerman
quote:Does the taxpayer have to pay his medical bills?
It means if you want to snort a line of coke or whatever your drug of choice is you won't be put in jail over it.
Posted on 3/1/18 at 9:23 am to Powerman
quote:
Do you take this deal?
No. You're asking me to accept the status quo on my side for a concession on the other side.
How about in exchange for an end to the war on drugs, no more gun restrictive measures and the national hearing protection act passes?
Deal?
Posted on 3/1/18 at 9:23 am to Powerman
Nope.
I think alcohol and pot should be legal, but the rest should remain illegal. The family abuse that goes part in parcel with pot and alcohol are bad enough, but coke, heroin, meth, etc., take it to a whole other level.
With the right to keep and bear arms a Constitutional pillar already, the deal is essentially giving me what I already have in exchange for a higher percentage of drug addled zombies, either homeless, or abusing their families in favor of their drug of choice.
No dice for me.
I think alcohol and pot should be legal, but the rest should remain illegal. The family abuse that goes part in parcel with pot and alcohol are bad enough, but coke, heroin, meth, etc., take it to a whole other level.
With the right to keep and bear arms a Constitutional pillar already, the deal is essentially giving me what I already have in exchange for a higher percentage of drug addled zombies, either homeless, or abusing their families in favor of their drug of choice.
No dice for me.
Posted on 3/1/18 at 9:24 am to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
Does the taxpayer have to pay his medical bills?
They shouldn't. As a bonus, natural selection should take care of the drug problem in a couple generations.
Posted on 3/1/18 at 9:24 am to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
Why just that risky behavior?
Because it's a negotiation and in order to shoot up legally you have to agree to pay for your own treatment if you OD.
Sugar drinks and Burger King are legal. Nothing to negotiate.
Having said that, I'm all for charging anyone with bad health behaviors more money for their insurance. It's the right thing to do and the best thing to do to affect change.
Posted on 3/1/18 at 9:25 am to roadGator
quote:
Because it's a negotiation and in order to shoot up legally you have to agree to pay for your own treatment if you OD.
Pay for it with what?
Posted on 3/1/18 at 9:26 am to Powerman
quote:
Can you tell me what drug that you typically shoot up is legal in California?
Didn’t they create safe spaces for people to shoot up?
Posted on 3/1/18 at 9:26 am to DuckManiak
quote:
Sure, if you want to shoot up meth, that’s your prerogative. Government shouldn’t waste billions on someone that willingly chooses to put deadly poison into their bodies.
Like alcohol?
You know the root word of intoxication?
This post was edited on 3/1/18 at 9:27 am
Page 2 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News