- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pro 2nd Amendment guys - would you take this deal?
Posted on 3/1/18 at 9:54 am to Powerman
Posted on 3/1/18 at 9:54 am to Powerman
We dont need a deal dumbass. It is in the comstitution that we can have guns. Drugs are killing our kids and only a fricking idiot would make a suggestion like this or a child!
1
Posted on 3/1/18 at 9:55 am to Powerman
quote:
Repeat the word hypothetical in your head about 5000 times until it sinks in
I get that it is a hypothetical, but even with a hypothetical, I still consider the potential pitfalls.
Posted on 3/1/18 at 9:56 am to BamaScoop
quote:
We dont need a deal dumbass. It is in the comstitution that we can have guns.
Then why do people get all bent out of shape when people stop supporting the NRA?
The NRA should not be a necessity to protect our constitutional rights.
Posted on 3/1/18 at 9:56 am to Powerman
quote:
It's a philosophical discussion.
It would be a way to thin the population. How many crack/meth heads bite the dust in the first year?
Posted on 3/1/18 at 9:59 am to Dr_Tim_Whatley
quote:
The war on drug is an absolute joke. The DEA only catches and confiscates 1.5% of drugs coming into America.
No argument there. The reality is there is no war. If there was a war on drugs, we would control our borders. We wouldn't send billions of taxpayer dollars in aid, or do billions of dollars in trade to countries who import death to our citizens. If it was a war, we'd napalm the poppy fields and coca plants, and charge the countries that harbor them for doing it.
quote:
Making them illegal is the wrong deterrant. Legalize them, and develop more education in schools about them. Education of their harm is the most effective deterrent.
I disagree. There are too many educated heroin, coke, and even meth addicts for that to be the case. These drugs take over people's lives, becoming the most important thing in it.
quote:
If they still choose to do them, well, that's their issue. Self responsibility.
But then they become society's responsibility. Their children become society's responsibility.
Posted on 3/1/18 at 9:59 am to Powerman
I do not care to bargain with my rights in any fashion, once you do it's only a matter of time before you get a raw deal.
Posted on 3/1/18 at 9:59 am to Powerman
quote:
he war on drugs ends and all drugs are decriminalized.
Be fine with it if you leave addicts in the street puking themselves to death and clear out the bodies with street sweepers. Same with alcoholics. Same with suicide survivors.
Execute on sight blackmarket drug and gun dealers.
No public expenditure on self-destructive activities - allow Darwinisn weed those traits out of the DNA going forward.
If private organizations want to spend money on charity for self-abuses, so be it.
Posted on 3/1/18 at 10:00 am to MrLarson
quote:
It would be a way to thin the population. How many crack/meth heads bite the dust in the first year?
I'm not sure why you think the laws are inhibiting from doing that currently
Posted on 3/1/18 at 10:00 am to Powerman
quote:
Just wondering if some people are still anti-legalization to the point where they'd risk something important to them.
Honestly, maybe I'm way off on this..........but I suspect that the more rabid one is about 2nd Amendment rights, the more likely they are to support drug legalization or at least massive reduction in the drug war.
I don't think we're the problem on that one.
Posted on 3/1/18 at 10:00 am to Powerman
Absolutely. The war on all drugs is a joke .
Posted on 3/1/18 at 10:00 am to Powerman
Sweet, the American people win on both ends.
Posted on 3/1/18 at 10:01 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
Execute on sight blackmarket drug and gun dealers.
I don't think you're really getting the point of this
We're going for more freedom. Not a Draconian murdering government.
Posted on 3/1/18 at 10:01 am to troyt37
quote:
I disagree. There are too many educated heroin, coke, and even meth addicts for that to be the case. These drugs take over people's lives, becoming the most important thing in it.
Let nature take its course.
quote:
But then they become society's responsibility.
frick that. Let them die.
Posted on 3/1/18 at 10:03 am to Centinel
quote:
frick that. Let them die.
So if someone with children has a problem with drugs or alcohol your preference would be that they die instead of getting treatment?
Am I reading this right?
Posted on 3/1/18 at 10:03 am to Centinel
quote:
But along with this if you're a druggie, no taxpayer funded healthcare.
Shouldn't have taxpayer funded healthcare anyway for the general population (just for children and elderly)
Posted on 3/1/18 at 10:03 am to sparkinator
quote:
And piss test anyone on gov assistance or certain jobs.
Exactly that - no welfare of any kind for any drug usage.
Posted on 3/1/18 at 10:04 am to Powerman
quote:I wouldn't have a problem with this other than more of you morons get on road under the influence which puts my family at greater risk.
It means if you want to snort a line of coke or whatever your drug of choice is you won't be put in jail over it
Posted on 3/1/18 at 10:04 am to Powerman
quote:
So if someone with children has a problem with drugs or alcohol your preference would be that they die instead of getting treatment?
Sure they can get treatment. As long as I'm not paying for it.
quote:
Am I reading this right?
Indeed you are. I shouldn't be financially responsible for someone's shitty life choices.
This post was edited on 3/1/18 at 10:05 am
Posted on 3/1/18 at 10:04 am to Powerman
quote:
So if someone with children has a problem with drugs or alcohol your preference would be that they die instead of getting treatment?
Pretty much - if they can afford treatment let them pay for it.
If they cannot afford treatment, they don't need to be raising children anyway.
Posted on 3/1/18 at 10:04 am to Powerman
quote:
I'm not sure why you think the laws are inhibiting from doing that currently
At some point crack/meth heads are going to get scooped up by LEO's and spend some time in county and have to get clean. If you give them unlimited dope they will eventually kill themselves with it.
Page 4 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News