- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:27 am to tigeraddict
quote:
all this does is embolden Iran to think they can wait it out.....
That’s the whole point!
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:29 am to tarzana
quote:Hopefully better than Obama and his $1.4B payments sent on pallets.
How are those working out?
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:30 am to blueboy
The fact that you deny it is irrelevant. Their possession of highly enriched uranium is well documented. From there, the time frame to building a bomb is well documented to be a matter of a few weeks to a few months.
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:33 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
This is probably what's coming.
Trump "vetoing" the War Powers Resolution Act is Constitutionally irrelevant since only Congress can declare war, and their rejection of war in the context of Iran, makes any further military action by Trump against Iran an unconstitutional, and impeachable, act.
Where does it say in the Constitution that the president can't veto this legislation?
Everything I see says that the President has constitutional authority to veto any bill or resolution that isn't an amendment or internal congressional action. It doesn't say he has the authority to veto anything except a war powers resolution.
Where does it say in the Constitution that the president is beholden to bills and resolutions that never make it into law?
So, since the president has the constitutional authority to veto bills and resolutions, how is it unconstitutional for the president to take action against a bill or resolution that never made its way to a law?
You and Barnes are desperately trying to twist the Constitution to fit your own personal desires.
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:33 am to wdhalgren
quote:
The fact that you deny it is irrelevant. Their possession of highly enriched uranium is well documented. From there, the time frame to building a bomb is well documented to be a matter of a few weeks to a few months.
The strait of Hormuz is their nuclear bomb
They don't need a nuke to cause massive pain
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:37 am to Powerman
quote:
The strait of Hormuz is their nuclear bomb
They don't need a nuke to cause massive pain
You're right. They want the nuclear bomb so they can control the strait without interference. That's why they absolutely are, especially with China's backing, a regional and global threat.
This post was edited on 6/4/26 at 9:38 am
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:52 am to wdhalgren
quote:by who?
well documented
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:54 am to DeBoar
quote:
Dealing with an out of control regime isn’t an easy thing. You guys like to celebrate that it hasn’t been done asap.
Everyone in the world knew beforehand it wasn't easy-—your Daddy Trump and his ilk were the ones saying it would be a walk in the park. Over in a week or so.
This post was edited on 6/4/26 at 10:54 am
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:54 am to loogaroo
People should be more upset that Congress sat on their hands for so long until now…
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:57 am to loogaroo
But we destroyed their navy!
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:58 am to wdhalgren
quote:
They will be when they acquire nuclear weapons, which was very close.
So operation Midnight Hammer didn't obliterate their nuclear weapons program?
Posted on 6/4/26 at 10:02 am to wdhalgren
quote:
They will be when they acquire nuclear weapons, which was very close. They had already built and situated their conventional forces in preparation for blocking international waters in the SOH
Our own intelligence reports said they were not close. Even POTUS himself said we set them back years after Operation Midnight Hammer.
Are you calling POTUS a liar?
quote:
They have militia operating all over the middle east. When you finance armed forces to operate in other countries against those countries' will, that's a defacto invasion
We have more and ours are actual professional troops as well as militias we have trained.
So?
Posted on 6/4/26 at 10:03 am to The_Duke
quote:He has an elk now? That actually sounds kind of badass.
Trump and his elk
ETA: Oh shite! He does!!
This post was edited on 6/4/26 at 10:05 am
Posted on 6/4/26 at 10:05 am to tarzana
quote:
Now there's a non-sequitur par excellence!
Tarzana rooting for the Mullahs. TDS is real.
Posted on 6/4/26 at 10:08 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
This is probably what's coming.
Posted on 6/4/26 at 10:09 am to BBONDS25
quote:
Tarzana rooting for the Mullahs. TDS is real.
Your dishonesty knows no bounds
Posted on 6/4/26 at 10:09 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
I disagree. It's nice to see Congress do their job.
You support Iran.
We all know this.
Popular
Back to top


1








