Started By
Message

re: People should be more upset with the war powers resolution the house passed yesterday.

Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:26 am to
Posted by wdhalgren
Member since May 2013
5392 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:26 am to
quote:

Take it away, Bibi!


He was right.
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
42691 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:27 am to
quote:

all this does is embolden Iran to think they can wait it out.....


That’s the whole point!
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
65717 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:27 am to
Posted by weptiger
Georgia
Member since Feb 2007
11821 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:29 am to
quote:

How are those working out?
Hopefully better than Obama and his $1.4B payments sent on pallets.
Posted by wdhalgren
Member since May 2013
5392 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:30 am to


The fact that you deny it is irrelevant. Their possession of highly enriched uranium is well documented. From there, the time frame to building a bomb is well documented to be a matter of a few weeks to a few months.
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus
Member since Jan 2018
11434 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:33 am to
quote:

This is probably what's coming.

Trump "vetoing" the War Powers Resolution Act is Constitutionally irrelevant since only Congress can declare war, and their rejection of war in the context of Iran, makes any further military action by Trump against Iran an unconstitutional, and impeachable, act.



Where does it say in the Constitution that the president can't veto this legislation?

Everything I see says that the President has constitutional authority to veto any bill or resolution that isn't an amendment or internal congressional action. It doesn't say he has the authority to veto anything except a war powers resolution.

Where does it say in the Constitution that the president is beholden to bills and resolutions that never make it into law?

So, since the president has the constitutional authority to veto bills and resolutions, how is it unconstitutional for the president to take action against a bill or resolution that never made its way to a law?

You and Barnes are desperately trying to twist the Constitution to fit your own personal desires.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
174148 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:33 am to
quote:

The fact that you deny it is irrelevant. Their possession of highly enriched uranium is well documented. From there, the time frame to building a bomb is well documented to be a matter of a few weeks to a few months.

The strait of Hormuz is their nuclear bomb

They don't need a nuke to cause massive pain
Posted by wdhalgren
Member since May 2013
5392 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:37 am to
quote:

The strait of Hormuz is their nuclear bomb

They don't need a nuke to cause massive pain


You're right. They want the nuclear bomb so they can control the strait without interference. That's why they absolutely are, especially with China's backing, a regional and global threat.
This post was edited on 6/4/26 at 9:38 am
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
115700 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:38 am to
Trump can veto it.
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
65717 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:52 am to
quote:

well documented
by who?
Posted by The_Duke
Member since Nov 2016
4475 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:54 am to
quote:

Dealing with an out of control regime isn’t an easy thing. You guys like to celebrate that it hasn’t been done asap.


Everyone in the world knew beforehand it wasn't easy-—your Daddy Trump and his ilk were the ones saying it would be a walk in the park. Over in a week or so.
This post was edited on 6/4/26 at 10:54 am
Posted by AGGIES
Member since Jul 2021
12501 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:54 am to
People should be more upset that Congress sat on their hands for so long until now…
Posted by AGGIES
Member since Jul 2021
12501 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:57 am to
But we destroyed their navy!

Posted by TigerFanatic99
South Bend, Indiana
Member since Jan 2007
36021 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:58 am to
quote:

They will be when they acquire nuclear weapons, which was very close.


So operation Midnight Hammer didn't obliterate their nuclear weapons program?
Posted by UtahCajun
Member since Jul 2021
6034 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 10:02 am to
quote:

They will be when they acquire nuclear weapons, which was very close. They had already built and situated their conventional forces in preparation for blocking international waters in the SOH

Our own intelligence reports said they were not close. Even POTUS himself said we set them back years after Operation Midnight Hammer.

Are you calling POTUS a liar?
quote:

They have militia operating all over the middle east. When you finance armed forces to operate in other countries against those countries' will, that's a defacto invasion

We have more and ours are actual professional troops as well as militias we have trained.
So?
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
65717 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 10:03 am to
quote:

Trump and his elk
He has an elk now? That actually sounds kind of badass.

ETA: Oh shite! He does!!

This post was edited on 6/4/26 at 10:05 am
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59515 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 10:05 am to
quote:

Now there's a non-sequitur par excellence!


Tarzana rooting for the Mullahs. TDS is real.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59515 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 10:08 am to
quote:

This is probably what's coming.


Congress hasn’t declared war since 1942. You fricking moron.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
174148 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 10:09 am to
quote:


Tarzana rooting for the Mullahs. TDS is real.


Your dishonesty knows no bounds
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
90060 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 10:09 am to
quote:

I disagree. It's nice to see Congress do their job.



You support Iran.


We all know this.


first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram