- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:00 am to tarzana
quote:
How are those working out?
The sabotage of negotiations started before the fighting even began. Iran sends their thanks.
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:02 am to Bunk Moreland
Yes, at least they’re paying attention and may be growing something approximating balls…
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:03 am to LSU Patrick
He doesnt vote with Dems!!- Massholes 
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:05 am to loogaroo
quote:
negotiations with a terrorist regime.
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:06 am to SantaFe
quote:
Imagine if congress had done this to Frankie Roosevelt when he was dealing with Herr Hitler ?
The situations aren't even remotely similar
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:09 am to Powerman
quote:
The situations aren't even remotely similar
That's for sure. In WWII the bulk of democrats weren't radical leftists trying to undermine the country.
This post was edited on 6/4/26 at 9:11 am
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:11 am to wdhalgren
This is probably what's coming.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:12 am to loogaroo
quote:
That is so disingenuous. You know damn well you don’t undermine a president in the middle of negotiations with a terrorist regime.
also probably why most presidents don't primary against their own party's incumbents during the miderms
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:13 am to wdhalgren
quote:
That's for sure. In WWII the bulk of democrats weren't radical leftists trying to undermine the country.
And Iran isn't the regional threat that Nazi Germany was in Europe
What countries have they invaded?
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:15 am to wackatimesthree
quote:Massie has consistently voted against actions like this and aid to Israel. There's nothing selective about it.
Selectively acting
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:16 am to SDVTiger
quote:
He doesnt vote with Dems!!- Massholes
Another thing that’s bullshite about the conservative score you can vote no against the war yet frick over your own party. They really need to remove the R from his name and make him an I for the rest of this Congress.
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:18 am to loogaroo
it was a "continuing resolution" not a "joint resolution", so it carries no real constitutional power.
it was done for political theatre, and 4 RINOs with TDS voted to hurt trump....
all this does is embolden Iran to think they can wait it out.....
it was done for political theatre, and 4 RINOs with TDS voted to hurt trump....
all this does is embolden Iran to think they can wait it out.....
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:18 am to Powerman
quote:
And Iran isn't the regional threat that Nazi Germany was in Europe
They will be when they acquire nuclear weapons, which was very close. They had already built and situated their conventional forces in preparation for blocking international waters in the SOH.
quote:
What countries have they invaded?
They have militia operating all over the middle east. When you finance armed forces to operate in other countries against those countries' will, that's a defacto invasion.
This post was edited on 6/4/26 at 9:20 am
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:19 am to tarzana
quote:
How are those working out?
Might have gone better if your side and the media hadn’t tried to undermine Trump’s every move.
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:22 am to wdhalgren
quote:Take it away, Bibi!
They will be when they acquire nuclear weapons, which was very close
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:22 am to DeBoar
100% anyone defending him now is just a clown
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:26 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
This is probably what's coming.
We’ve been under a continuing resolution since Jug Ears. Did this bill address that?
Plus they have to win the house unless they are counting on the RINOs.
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:26 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
This is probably what's coming.
this is what they are angling to, should dems take the house in the fall. but, if you read up on the War power act and the process to end the 60 (+30) window, congress must pass a Joint Resolution which becomes "law" after being passed by a simple majority in both chambers, and is not need to be signed by the president (so also cannot be vetoed).
however, a joint resolution requires 60 votes to end debate (so would be effected by filibuster rules)
and the caveat to all of this, is the supreme court has never vetted the constitutionality of the war powers act.
Popular
Back to top


1









