Started By
Message

re: Pentagon flunks seventh audit failing to explain to Americans where $824 billion went

Posted on 11/17/24 at 11:21 am to
Posted by Roll Tide Ravens
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2015
51714 posts
Posted on 11/17/24 at 11:21 am to
quote:

He’s not. Doesn’t make the audit situation any less crazy.

Evidently the people currently running the DoD aren’t qualified either but I bet you didn’t question them.
Posted by Stagg8
Houston
Member since Jan 2005
13454 posts
Posted on 11/17/24 at 11:21 am to
I totally agree the failed audits are crazy. I said as much in the first post.

quote:

pet projects so Saudi can backdoor payments to his "foundation"


Taking money from Saudi is wrong?
Posted by Da #1 Stunna
985
Member since Oct 2012
2077 posts
Posted on 11/17/24 at 11:40 am to
Hegseth isnt qualified? REALLY????

Lets consider the accomplishments of the current loser sitting his fat arse in the Secratary of Defense seat:

1. Disappeared without notification to ANYONE for over a week while serving as Sec of Defense.
2. Allowed a Chinese spy balloon to fly over strategic military bases in our country.
3. Oversaw the embarrassingly pathetic Afghanistan withdrawal that cost us 13 servicemen.
4. Didn't stand up for our servicemen in defending them against mandatory COVID vaccinations.
5. Oversaw and helped to perpetuate the proliferation of the woke culture in our military.
6. Has left us woefully unprepared to defend our country by depleting our military stockpiles.

The bar is so ridiculously low for improvement, his successor can't do anything but succeed. Thank god we have Lloyd Austin and all his "experience" and "qualifications". It seems to have served us so well......
Posted by Rashcock
Lowcountry
Member since Sep 2024
305 posts
Posted on 11/17/24 at 11:43 am to
Posted by Warfox
B.R. Native (now in MA)
Member since Apr 2017
3833 posts
Posted on 11/17/24 at 11:49 am to
quote:

And people say Hegseth isn't qualified


quote:

He’s not. Doesn’t make the audit situation any less crazy.


Look where the “Qualified” people have gotten us.

Time for something different, losers.
Posted by Stagg8
Houston
Member since Jan 2005
13454 posts
Posted on 11/17/24 at 11:51 am to
No problem with this take at all.
Posted by Longhorn Actual
Member since Dec 2023
3190 posts
Posted on 11/17/24 at 11:53 am to
The title is a bit misleading. The audit didn't say $824b is missing. It says they have a budget of $824b and can't account for each individual dollar of it.

Big difference.

But yes, the government is incredibly wasteful, inefficient, and needs a haircut. Those MFers need an arse kicking too.

Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
19987 posts
Posted on 11/17/24 at 12:12 pm to
Even if an audit can account for where the money went is that okay?

The procurement cost of the f35 was 422 billion, the cost over the life is now projected at 2 TRILLION. So thats okay? Maybe someone might want to pull the plug now and just piss away 422 versus 2 TRILLION. The program is woefully behind schedule and flawed beyond any sense of reason.

And this is one program, one program, for a platform that is about as useful as a nine pounder cannon.
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
19987 posts
Posted on 11/17/24 at 12:16 pm to
double post
This post was edited on 11/17/24 at 12:18 pm
Posted by Trevaylin
south texas
Member since Feb 2019
11018 posts
Posted on 11/17/24 at 12:27 pm to
Audit processes should be clear in result

Meets expectation........promotoable out come

needs improvement........list of defined deficiency, require action plan and progress reporting

fails........need lists of defined deficiency, requires action plan and progress reporting. Also responsible mgmt. to be reviewed for demotion


Posted by LaMigra
Member since Nov 2022
2773 posts
Posted on 11/17/24 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

$824 billion


It all went to Ukr-ainus
Posted by armytiger96
Member since Sep 2007
2560 posts
Posted on 11/17/24 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

Even if an audit can account for where the money went is that okay? The procurement cost of the f35 was 422 billion, the cost over the life is now projected at 2 TRILLION. So thats okay? Maybe someone might want to pull the plug now and just piss away 422 versus 2 TRILLION. The program is woefully behind schedule and flawed beyond any sense of reason. And this is one program, one program, for a platform that is about as useful as a nine pounder cannon.


He's not defending the budget or the expenses associated with it. Instead he's pointing out that the OP's title is extremely misleading:

quote:

Pentagon flunks seventh audit failing to explain to Americans where $824 billion went


He was pointing out that OP's title has a completely different meaning than what the article stated.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
56146 posts
Posted on 11/17/24 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

The title is a bit misleading.


No it's not. The title didn't say it was missing. That's your interpretation of the title.

quote:

It says they have a budget of $824b and can't account for each individual dollar of it.



So the first question in my mind then is where did it go? We all know it's not missing.
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
26717 posts
Posted on 11/17/24 at 1:06 pm to
Lets just tell it like it is.Ukraine is a war that theyre using to launder money. They impeached Trump to protect it. The party is over.
Posted by SquatchDawg
Cohutta Wilderness
Member since Sep 2012
20099 posts
Posted on 11/17/24 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

s unable to fully account for its massive $824 billion budget,


Why don’t they just say “were unwilling to tell us where the $824B went”. There’s no way there isn’t a record of where the money was spent or transferred to.
Posted by armytiger96
Member since Sep 2007
2560 posts
Posted on 11/17/24 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

Why don’t they just say “were unwilling to tell us where the $824B went”. There’s no way there isn’t a record of where the money was spent or transferred to.


Better yet why not tell us how much is unaccounted for? Is it $10, $10MM or $100B? Then we can determine how angry the taxpayers should be!
This post was edited on 11/17/24 at 1:40 pm
Posted by memphisplaya
Member since Jan 2009
87208 posts
Posted on 11/17/24 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

was Pete Hegseth’s highest military rank? Find me the last head of DoD with a similar resume.


So we should keep doing the same thing and expect a different result.

Einstein would like a word with you
Posted by Stagg8
Houston
Member since Jan 2005
13454 posts
Posted on 11/17/24 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

Einstein would like a word with you


Google “quotes misattributed to Einstein.”
Posted by Jack Carter
Member since Sep 2018
12200 posts
Posted on 11/17/24 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

He’s not.


Yes he is

quote:

Doesn’t make the audit situation any less crazy.


Get Hegseth in there to fix it.
Posted by PineyWoodsHog
Darla Say Dictate Good
Member since Sep 2021
3070 posts
Posted on 11/17/24 at 2:13 pm to
Nearly 3 in 10 of all Secretaries of Defense never served in the Armed Forces.

quote:

Four of these six men without military service were appointed by Republican presidents: Charles Wilson (Eisenhower), Neil McElroy (Eisenhower), James Schlesinger (Nixon), and Dick Cheney (George H.W. Bush).


Eisenhower, General of the Army during WW2, obviously thought it was important for the SoD to have high ranking military experience because he would never appoint someone with out...oh wait.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram