- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Official US/Israel vs Iran war thread
Posted on 3/24/26 at 3:03 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 3/24/26 at 3:03 pm to hawgfaninc
This popping up in my feed. Don't know how valid it is but it may hint at the taking of islands in the straight. I seriously doubt a actual inland ground force sets foot in Iran proper.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 3/24/26 at 3:05 pm
Posted on 3/24/26 at 3:06 pm to BayouBengal51
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Not only is the volume of missiles that Iran is launching gone down significantly, we are seeing more of them fail after launch.
Posted on 3/24/26 at 3:07 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 3/24/26 at 3:08 pm to BayouBengal51
Posted on 3/24/26 at 3:08 pm to BayouBengal51
Posted on 3/24/26 at 3:17 pm to BayouBengal51
Posted on 3/24/26 at 3:18 pm to Spaceman Spiff
quote:
s that a real last name?
"peace out motherf*ckers"
The first name did not even register with me until I read your post.
Posted on 3/24/26 at 3:24 pm to chalupa
quote:
Regime change for Trump means killing Ayatollah and anyone other loyalist and replacing him with someone more friendly to US and negotitable i.e. Delcy in Venezuela
That would be a failure in my eyes. When you’ve gone this far, complete dismantle of the IRGC regime is the only acceptable answer. A deal with this regime just kicks the can down the road a decade or two.
The only way that a deal with this regimen could not be considered a failure is if the Iran agrees to new elections in which candidates do not have to be approved by the Guardian Council to run, allows international observers, and gets rid of the Supreme Leader position and all the IRGC organizations. Basically a surrender in which we let the current president of Iran be the caretaker instead of Reza.
Posted on 3/24/26 at 3:35 pm to BayouBengal51
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Even if that is true we can’t trust these bastards.
Posted on 3/24/26 at 3:43 pm to WeeWee
Right. They already said they wouldn’t go for a nuke but they refuse to give up uranium enrichment that leaves them one step short of a nuke.
Posted on 3/24/26 at 3:46 pm to WestCoastAg
Come on Trump you’re supposed to say that before markets open
Posted on 3/24/26 at 3:46 pm to WeeWee
quote:
Basically a surrender in which we let the current president of Iran be the caretaker instead of Reza.
Just my opinion, but in order to get the IRCG leadership to surrender, you have to give them some kind of safe haven. They're not gonna stop fighting if they know the population will tear them to shreds. Maybe they can be dealt with later, but right now flights out of the country might help end the conflict.
Posted on 3/24/26 at 3:48 pm to wdhalgren
I think the gift has something to do with Kharg Island
Posted on 3/24/26 at 4:08 pm to TurkeyBaconLeg
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
A ceasefire for a period of one month will be announced according to a mechanism that Witkoff and Kushner are working on, according to AI Arabiya citing Israeli Channel 12
The US aims at a month-long ceasefire
The agreement with Iran is very similar to the understandings in Gaza and Lebanon
A 15-point agreement will be negotiated during the month of a possible ceasefire.
The 15 Clauses of the Agreement with Iran (Via AI Hadath)
1. Automatically cancel the threat of reimposition of sanctions.
2. Dismantling Iran's Existing Nuclear Capabilities
3. Agreement with Iran... Iran vows to "never seek" nuclear weapons
4. Preventing the enrichment of any nuclear material on Iranian territory
5. Delivery of enriched uranium to IAEA
6. Decommissioning and destroying the sites of Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow
7. Grant the IAEA full access to all information
8. Iran abandons 'proxies' approach
9. Stopping funding and arming militias in the region
10. Keeping the Strait of Hormuz open without any closure
11. Postponement of decision on ballistic missile program
12. Ballistic missiles are only used for defense
13. Lifting all sanctions on Iran
14. Support for the development of a civilian nuclear program in Bushehr
15. Automatically cancel the threat of reimposition of sanctions
via AI Arabiva citing Israel's Channel 12 and also via AI Hadath citing Israel's Channel 12
Posted on 3/24/26 at 4:10 pm to hawgfaninc
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
BREAKING: The US is preparing options for military escalation in Iran, including potential boots on the ground in the case peace talks fail, per Axios.
A White House official says the situation is "fluid" and Trump wants to see if Iran will make a deal, but "if not we will go back to bombing them."
Everything is fluid & shrouded in the fog of war
Posted on 3/24/26 at 4:11 pm to ItTakesAThief
Trump claims that Iran has agreed to give up its enriched uranium as part of any deal:
LINK
The Israelis are most focused on this issue as well:
Speaking to The Media Line, he cautioned that ending the war while Iran still holds enriched uranium and continues to develop its missile program without meaningful limits would be a difficult outcome. “If the war ends with enriched uranium still in Iranian hands and their missile program not limited and supervised, then everything we did was for nothing,” he said. “It would be very, very disappointing.”
LINK
You don't have to trust Iran if they actually give up the enriched uranium. So I think that's the basis by which you have to judge any deal. If we leave with just some pinky promise that they will hand it over at some point in the future, I think that would be unacceptable to Israel and they would likely keep bombing on their own like they did in June, 2025.
LINK
The Israelis are most focused on this issue as well:
Speaking to The Media Line, he cautioned that ending the war while Iran still holds enriched uranium and continues to develop its missile program without meaningful limits would be a difficult outcome. “If the war ends with enriched uranium still in Iranian hands and their missile program not limited and supervised, then everything we did was for nothing,” he said. “It would be very, very disappointing.”
LINK
You don't have to trust Iran if they actually give up the enriched uranium. So I think that's the basis by which you have to judge any deal. If we leave with just some pinky promise that they will hand it over at some point in the future, I think that would be unacceptable to Israel and they would likely keep bombing on their own like they did in June, 2025.
This post was edited on 3/24/26 at 4:13 pm
Posted on 3/24/26 at 4:13 pm to hawgfaninc
they need to add
16. Let Persian women dump the hijab.
16. Let Persian women dump the hijab.
Posted on 3/24/26 at 4:14 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 3/24/26 at 4:22 pm to Aguga
quote:
5. Delivery of enriched uranium to IAEA
6. Decommissioning and destroying the sites of Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow
7. Grant the IAEA full access to all information
Hans Blix coming out of retirement.
Popular
Back to top



1






