Started By
Message

re: Obama judge Amy Berman Jackson just ruled that SNAP must continue to cover junk food

Posted on 6/23/26 at 4:48 am to
Posted by Turnblad85
Member since Sep 2022
5735 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 4:48 am to
One of theost ridiculous things we do in this country is give people money to go buy corn syrup drink and chips.

The bad dietary habits poor kids have developed from their mom's bringing home garbage food is diabolical. PepsiCo is happy to have new lifelong customers though.


I hope this judge stubbs her big toe while running from red wasps.
Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
31958 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 4:59 am to
quote:

This is just insane. The law as it is written gives potus power to regulate eligible food purchases.

So tired of these judges. But more importantly, I’m tired of lawyers bringing these cases to court in the first place.


They should just ignore the idiot judge's ruling and go about their day.

That judge should have zero authority here.
Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
31958 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 5:03 am to
quote:


No they shouldn’t. That whole separation of power thing


You do understand that the leftist judge here is NOT exercising seperaration of power right?

This is a presidential program the judge influencing.

So yeah, thanks for calling out the leftist judge even though you don't apoarently understand what seperation of power really is.
This post was edited on 6/23/26 at 5:09 am
Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
31958 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 5:08 am to
quote:

Supplemental is an important word too. If you're into things like words.


Anyone else getting bored of these stupid takes? I'm getting bored reading these ridiculous arguments every day.

You create these stupid arguments because that's all you have.

Beer can be considered supplemental as well I'm sure right? Anything in the store can be considered "supplemental".. that really is a stupid argument you're trying to make.
This post was edited on 6/23/26 at 5:12 am
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
56405 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 5:16 am to
quote:

President's should be able to remove judges below the Supreme Court at will.

No indeed not. That would destroy the constitutional order.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
56405 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 5:25 am to
quote:

Federal judges should not be appointed. They should be elected. They should at most have a two term limit, and each term should be around 5 years.

Some of the most wise government architects in history rejected this and for a great reason. They wanted the Judiciary to be free of public opinion. It is the weakest of the three branches, but it is designed to act as a brake on irrational majorities. Your proposal would remove that brake that our founders considered so important.

If this was done you’d see Presidents being able to implement their agenda much faster and more completely. That includes agendas like socialism.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram