- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Obama judge Amy Berman Jackson just ruled that SNAP must continue to cover junk food
Posted on 6/23/26 at 4:48 am to L.A.
Posted on 6/23/26 at 4:48 am to L.A.
One of theost ridiculous things we do in this country is give people money to go buy corn syrup drink and chips.
The bad dietary habits poor kids have developed from their mom's bringing home garbage food is diabolical. PepsiCo is happy to have new lifelong customers though.
I hope this judge stubbs her big toe while running from red wasps.
The bad dietary habits poor kids have developed from their mom's bringing home garbage food is diabolical. PepsiCo is happy to have new lifelong customers though.
I hope this judge stubbs her big toe while running from red wasps.
0
Posted on 6/23/26 at 4:59 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
This is just insane. The law as it is written gives potus power to regulate eligible food purchases.
So tired of these judges. But more importantly, I’m tired of lawyers bringing these cases to court in the first place.
They should just ignore the idiot judge's ruling and go about their day.
That judge should have zero authority here.
Posted on 6/23/26 at 5:03 am to wookalar1013
quote:
No they shouldn’t. That whole separation of power thing
You do understand that the leftist judge here is NOT exercising seperaration of power right?
This is a presidential program the judge is influencing.
So yeah, thanks for calling out the leftist judge even though you don't apoarently understand what seperation of power really is.
This post was edited on 6/23/26 at 9:39 am
Posted on 6/23/26 at 5:08 am to Powerman
quote:
Supplemental is an important word too. If you're into things like words.
Anyone else getting bored of these stupid takes? I'm getting bored reading these ridiculous arguments every day.
You create these stupid arguments because that's all you have.
Beer can be considered supplemental as well I'm sure right? Anything in the store can be considered "supplemental".. that really is a stupid argument you're trying to make.
This post was edited on 6/23/26 at 5:12 am
Posted on 6/23/26 at 5:16 am to theballguy
quote:
President's should be able to remove judges below the Supreme Court at will.
No indeed not. That would destroy the constitutional order.
Posted on 6/23/26 at 5:25 am to Plx1776
quote:
Federal judges should not be appointed. They should be elected. They should at most have a two term limit, and each term should be around 5 years.
Some of the most wise government architects in history rejected this and for a great reason. They wanted the Judiciary to be free of public opinion. It is the weakest of the three branches, but it is designed to act as a brake on irrational majorities. Your proposal would remove that brake that our founders considered so important.
If this was done you’d see Presidents being able to implement their agenda much faster and more completely. That includes agendas like socialism.
Posted on 6/23/26 at 6:32 am to L.A.
she doesnt have the authority
take to higher court, win, tell her to frick off.
these libtard judges need to be reigned in, tthye do not have the power, they believe they have.
take to higher court, win, tell her to frick off.
these libtard judges need to be reigned in, tthye do not have the power, they believe they have.
Posted on 6/23/26 at 6:40 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
Investigate the judges.
I read her Wikipedia and it doesn’t say the obvious in the “early life” section
You have to go down to the “personal life” portion to see why she’s undermining the country
Posted on 6/23/26 at 6:44 am to theballguy
quote:
President's should be able to remove judges below the Supreme Court at will.
No... but congress has the power. They refuse to use it.
For the record, our founders put trust in congress to do the right thing. Once they discovered the ability to rule forever and enrich themselves, our system became corrupted.
Posted on 6/23/26 at 6:51 am to Powerman
quote:
Supplemental is an important word too. If you're into things like words.
quote:
"Supplemental" functions as an adjective describing something added to improve, complete, or make up for a deficiency in something else. It refers to extra or auxiliary components, information, or resources that are not part of the core entity but support it.
You going to respond to anyone that called you out for this stupid comment?
If you’re going to make a smarmy comment like, “ If you're into things like words,” perhaps you should know the meaning of them.
Posted on 6/23/26 at 7:29 am to L.A.
This ruling doesn't impact Louisiana. As a tangent, why didn't louisiana ban snacks being bought with SNAP? What sort of half measure is that?
Posted on 6/23/26 at 7:37 am to junkyarddawg3
quote:
Wow! I guess I should listen to "Bad Hombre" on X and start hating this judge right now.
Grrrr! I'm angry. ?
Sorry that folks don't want to subsidize your fat arse.
Posted on 6/23/26 at 7:58 am to theballguy
quote:
President's should be able to remove judges below the Supreme Court at will.
This could be one of the dumbest statements I've ever read posted on this forum, but what is more disturbing is there are so many on here who agreed with so little downvotes. Separation of powers is a good thing unless you want dictatorships.
Posted on 6/23/26 at 8:24 am to wookalar1013
quote:
No they shouldn’t. That whole separation of power thing
I think we're all tired of that. Fatigue.
Posted on 6/23/26 at 8:24 am to L.A.
To be fair, article 111 in the Constitution does say the right to free junk food shall not be infringed
Posted on 6/23/26 at 9:03 am to i am dan
quote:
Beer can be considered supplemental as well I'm sure right? Anything in the store can be considered "supplemental".. that really is a stupid argument you're trying to make.
The “supplement” in supplemental nutrition assistance program is not referring to the types of food you are able to purchase. It’s referring to the program being a supplement to people buying their own food. It assumes that people will also be purchasing their own food that this program will be used to supplement.
The fact that some fig prog (Powerman) can’t even understand that is the most predictable thing ever.
Posted on 6/23/26 at 9:04 am to diehard24
quote:
This could be one of the dumbest statements I've ever read posted on this forum
What’s your take on the judge’s ruling?
Posted on 6/23/26 at 9:05 am to L.A.
The "junk food ban" didn't go anywhere near far enough. The entire system needs an overhaul.
The only liquids that should be allowed are milk and 100 percent fruit juices.
No soda, sweetened drinks or water. They can drink tap water. One of the biggest wastes of money is bottled water.
The only liquids that should be allowed are milk and 100 percent fruit juices.
No soda, sweetened drinks or water. They can drink tap water. One of the biggest wastes of money is bottled water.
Posted on 6/23/26 at 9:24 am to L.A.
Ok the judge made a ruling.
Now let’s see how she enforces it.
Now let’s see how she enforces it.
Posted on 6/23/26 at 9:24 am to L.A.
I wonder how junk food is defined.
Are something like Wheat Thins considered junk food?
Wheat Thins and pimento cheese is good.
Are something like Wheat Thins considered junk food?
Wheat Thins and pimento cheese is good.
This post was edited on 6/23/26 at 9:38 am
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News