- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 6/22/26 at 7:33 pm to Powerman
You are supplementing (providing extra) nutrition. Junk food is not nutrition.
Posted on 6/22/26 at 7:35 pm to Powerman
quote:
Supplemental is an important word too. If you're into things like words.
Look at this fat fig.
Posted on 6/22/26 at 7:36 pm to TigerBear1971
quote:
She wants PepsiCo, Kelloggs, Kraft Heinz, General Mills and on and on to keep dumping campaign money into Super Pacs. She gets a taste.
Don’t forget Coca Cola these guys have run the best global campaign for sugared caffeinated brown carbonated water. Unpopular but true.
This post was edited on 6/22/26 at 7:41 pm
Posted on 6/22/26 at 7:37 pm to L.A.
This lady and Boasburg should be co-presidents. No need to even have a president, or congress for that matter.
Posted on 6/22/26 at 7:37 pm to L.A.
Mama needs her snickers bar bro
Posted on 6/22/26 at 7:38 pm to Powerman
quote:
Supplemental is an important word too.
Which is why we should severely reduce the payouts. It should supplement not replace.
Posted on 6/22/26 at 7:40 pm to L.A.
Wow! I guess I should listen to "Bad Hombre" on X and start hating this judge right now.
Grrrr! I'm angry.
Grrrr! I'm angry.
Posted on 6/22/26 at 7:42 pm to W2NOMO
I really don’t understand how this is even an issue. Sodas, cookies, and chips are free at all California supermarkets
Posted on 6/22/26 at 7:42 pm to L.A.
Balance of power should be scotus, house and presidential administration keeping each other in check.
Federal judges should not be appointed. They should be elected. They should at most have a two term limit, and each term should be around 5 years.
Federal judges should not be appointed. They should be elected. They should at most have a two term limit, and each term should be around 5 years.
Posted on 6/22/26 at 7:46 pm to wookalar1013
quote:
No they shouldn’t. That whole separation of power thing
What is the check on abuse of power or subverting the will of the people?
Congress and POTUS can be voted out via elections, impeachments, etc
Posted on 6/22/26 at 7:47 pm to Plx1776
quote:
Federal judges should not be appointed. They should be elected. They should at most have a two term limit, and each term should be around 5 years.
What “they” would probably say to that idea, making federal judges elected, is that it would introduce the precise element into the federal judiciary that they/we don’t exactly want in it: politics, particularly that which comes with elections and campaigning (and campaign contributions and such).
This post was edited on 6/22/26 at 7:49 pm
Posted on 6/22/26 at 7:50 pm to Tigergreg
The SNAP benefits page states "Putting Healthy Food within Reach for Those in Need". That is very clear.
Posted on 6/22/26 at 7:51 pm to davyjones
They are sadly already political. I'd give em term limits and restrict their power. Take away their ability to single handedly hinder the entire executive branch or legislative branch.
If they are mad at something the two major branches are doing, they can send a petition to the head of their judicial branch, the scotus, and request the supremes to step in and do something.
If they are mad at something the two major branches are doing, they can send a petition to the head of their judicial branch, the scotus, and request the supremes to step in and do something.
Posted on 6/22/26 at 7:54 pm to RemyLeBeau
quote:
What is the check on abuse of power or subverting the will of the people?
Not ruling the way you want is neither an abuse of power nor subverting the will of “the people”
Posted on 6/22/26 at 7:56 pm to wookalar1013
I will wait for SlowAmyPro to weigh in on the subject.
Posted on 6/22/26 at 7:56 pm to wookalar1013
quote:
Not ruling the way you want is neither an abuse of power nor subverting the will of “the people”
Except that when those rulings are being used to subvert the will of the people and constantly overturned on their merits
Posted on 6/22/26 at 7:57 pm to L.A.
frick her.
Seriously, frick her.
Trump should announce that his Administration will no longer recognize, nor abide by, any rulings from any court other that the SCOTUS, and only after full briefing and oral argument.
Enough of these fricking lower court judges assuming a status equal to the President of the United States.
Seriously, frick her.
Trump should announce that his Administration will no longer recognize, nor abide by, any rulings from any court other that the SCOTUS, and only after full briefing and oral argument.
Enough of these fricking lower court judges assuming a status equal to the President of the United States.
Posted on 6/22/26 at 7:57 pm to L.A.
Is like to learn more about the parties who contested the snap eligibility and if they have ties to large food conglomerates.
quote:Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted on 6/22/26 at 7:59 pm to Plx1776
quote:
Federal judges should not be appointed
Maybe the worst idea I have seen on this board in a long time.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News