- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Not the Bee - Fed judge blocks RFK from banning artificial dyes in food
Posted on 12/26/25 at 1:36 pm to TerryDawg03
Posted on 12/26/25 at 1:36 pm to TerryDawg03
quote:
Take it to SCOTUS and stop this legislating from the bench.
Didn’t they already rule on this, saying lower courts can’t make sweeping national decisions?
ETA: this ruling only affects West Virginia, so SCOTUS’ ruling in Trump v. CASA does not apply. Get to work West Virginia.
This post was edited on 12/26/25 at 1:44 pm
Posted on 12/26/25 at 1:49 pm to Undertow
Haven't I seen that gap between the front teeth somewhere before?
Posted on 12/26/25 at 2:05 pm to CAD703X
Ignore em
Screw these rogue, America hating, cucks
Screw these rogue, America hating, cucks
Posted on 12/26/25 at 2:07 pm to CAD703X
This is something even the left is in agreement with. My goodness this is absolute ridiculousness.
Posted on 12/26/25 at 2:14 pm to SallysHuman
Well that pic explains everything. She don't want muted colors on her lucky charms.
Posted on 12/26/25 at 2:17 pm to CAD703X
Good. I just bought stock in a company that has developed a non-nutritive cereal varnish.
Posted on 12/26/25 at 2:38 pm to CAD703X
Once again, Obama and the deep state fundamentally changed this country alright. They may have doomed it as well, which was always their plan.
Posted on 12/26/25 at 3:31 pm to TerryDawg03
quote:
How does one federal judge have the power to override legislation signed into law by a governor?
Take it to SCOTUS and stop this legislating from the bench.
This sounds like it's exactly what this is. Legislating from the bench.
Posted on 12/26/25 at 3:34 pm to CAD703X
Why should the government ban food products? Capitalism. Let the consumer decide what to purchase. Less government.
Posted on 12/26/25 at 3:36 pm to Christopher Columbo
quote:
These activist judges need to be held accountable.
I don't know how we do this, but it MUST happen. They have made a mockery of the Judicial system...and getting rich from Soros.
Posted on 12/26/25 at 4:05 pm to stelly1025
quote:
This is something even the left is in agreement with
Not anymore because OMB.
Posted on 12/26/25 at 4:09 pm to CAD703X
quote:
Muh democracy is at stake if we ban artificial dyes!
I don't know anything about the case, but either him and the FDA have the legal authority to ban dyes using the process they used or they don't.
How logical or good the action is is irrelevant.
Posted on 12/26/25 at 4:26 pm to CAD703X
It's always the same story with these rulings. A judge blocks something that actually makes sense for public health just because of some technicality or corporate lobbying. We're way behind other countries on this stuff.
Posted on 12/26/25 at 4:30 pm to SallysHuman
She aint eatin' no naturally died Froot Loops...
Posted on 12/26/25 at 4:58 pm to High C
quote:
Big Dye obviously throwing their weight around.
Well, what else are they supposed to do with all that carcinogenic tartrazine (yellow 5) that they've been poisoning us with for decades?
Did you know that clothing manufacturers used to use it to color garments, but they ceased because it was ruled a dangerous chemical for human contact? But the FDA somehow found it fit for human consumption.
You cannot unsee this shite once your eyes have been opened.
Posted on 12/26/25 at 5:06 pm to SixthAndBarone
quote:that's a fricking stupid argument.
Why should the government ban food products? Capitalism. Let the consumer decide what to purchase. Less government.
So it's ok to have poison in our food supply because consumers should be better educated to know to avoid them?
Hint: you can't avoid them right now.
I hear the lead industry is planning to add lead to our vitamins, paint and pencils. But it's ok the consumers can choose.
frick off.
This post was edited on 12/26/25 at 5:09 pm
Posted on 12/26/25 at 5:10 pm to TigerAxeOK
quote:sixth and baratone says it should be available in both products and let the consumers decide.
Did you know that clothing manufacturers used to use it to color garments, but they ceased because it was ruled a dangerous chemical for human contact? But the FDA somehow found it fit for human consumption
Posted on 12/26/25 at 5:26 pm to CAD703X
quote:
She don't want muted colors on her lucky charms.
Now you know she’s a Count Chocula kinda girl.
For the poster who wants less government. How about qualified, accountable agencies, being paid to research and provide restrictions on the products to protect the people paying them.
Posted on 12/26/25 at 5:44 pm to CAD703X
Judges are terrible. Congress should step in
Posted on 12/26/25 at 6:19 pm to CAD703X
Martial Law with cots in Guantanimo, along with a Constitutional Convention seems necessary.
Popular
Back to top


1







