- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Newsweek: An Informer Told the FBI What Docs Trump Was Hiding, and Where
Posted on 8/10/22 at 3:22 pm to BBONDS25
Posted on 8/10/22 at 3:22 pm to BBONDS25
quote:It is interesting, but I suspect that probably cause affidavits based upon confidential informants are wrong as often as they are correct. Facts change and things move, as the issue winds its way through the legal system.
I am amazed nobody else caught the most important piece. According to the government official in the Newsweek piece, the warrant was obtained based upon false information. How isn’t that a huge deal?
Being a criminal law guy, you probably know more about the percentages than I.
This post was edited on 8/10/22 at 3:25 pm
2
Posted on 8/10/22 at 3:23 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
They got 15 boxes a few months ago which contained some degree of classified documents, now they've been informed there is more there so they probably went there to search through everything.
They got 15 boxes.....then sent those 15 boxes back......then left again with 15 boxes. These are almost certainly the same documents they've already seen and are aware of.
Posted on 8/10/22 at 3:23 pm to UpToPar
And added an extra padlock on door as requested.
Posted on 8/10/22 at 3:24 pm to Jake88
quote:
raid was scheduled with no political motive,
Here is how you know the entire article is bogus. They always give themselves away in the article.
Posted on 8/10/22 at 3:24 pm to jatilen
quote:
an FBI confidential human source
Omarosa?
quote:
FBI decision-makers in Washington…
But Biden didn’t know!
Posted on 8/10/22 at 3:25 pm to jatilen
quote:
According to experts familiar with FBI practices, Judge Reinhart reviewed the prosecutor's evidence and asked numerous questions about the sources and the urgency
they showed him a piece of paper with just Epstein on it and he signed it.
Posted on 8/10/22 at 3:25 pm to AggieHank86
Al-Jaserra last night had a small article on the third page, that said they had a confidential source that said the planted informant was a Russian asset sent by Putin to frick up the fbi and Biden with false info that the fbi acts upon and gets embarrassed.
this is all about Putin messing with Biden in return for the Ukraine mess.
Posted on 8/10/22 at 3:25 pm to UpToPar
quote:DB said that the receipt on Monday referenced 13 (not 15) boxes. Is that not correct?
They got 15 boxes.....then sent those 15 boxes back......then left again with 15 boxes. These are almost certainly the same documents they've already seen and are aware of.
Posted on 8/10/22 at 3:26 pm to doubleb
quote:
Furthermore, if the informant was credible then why did the judge permit the FBI to search all of the house?
Precisely. This Newsweek article isn’t good for the FBI of people understand what they are reading.
Posted on 8/10/22 at 3:26 pm to jatilen
quote:
human source, one who was able to identify what classified documents former President Trump was still hiding and even the location of those documents
Then why did they spend 8 hours digging through everything Trump had, including an empty safe?
Posted on 8/10/22 at 3:27 pm to AggieHank86
You try to act like you’re so neutral, but literally everything you say is slanted to the left
Posted on 8/10/22 at 3:28 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
DB said that the receipt on Monday referenced 13 (not 15) boxes. Is that not correct?
I didn't see that, but I haven't been keeping a close eye on the new information coming out. I know the initial reports were that it was 15 boxes. I also know that the 15 boxes that the FBI was previously interested in were returned to Mar-a-lago.
Posted on 8/10/22 at 3:29 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
It is interesting, but I suspect that probably cause affidavits based upon confidential informants are wrong as often as they are correct. Facts change and things move, as the issue winds its way through the legal system.
As was previously brought up, if the informant said the docs would be in the safe, why did the judge allow them to search the entire house? I understand your desire to be the contrarian, but even you have to think this smells.
quote:
It is interesting, but I suspect that probably cause affidavits based upon confidential informants are wrong as often as they are correct. Facts change and things move, as the issue winds its way through the legal system.
Haven’t been a criminal guy since I got my LLM. But even years and years removed, this whole thing is pretty insane. Raiding a former presidents home based upon faulty information with a liberally applied warrant.
Posted on 8/10/22 at 3:29 pm to TheRouxGuru
quote:
You try to act like you’re so neutral, but literally everything you say is slanted to the left
That can't be. He has an artsy picture of William Buckley as his avatar.
Posted on 8/10/22 at 3:30 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Who knows?
We all know. They are in cya mode. Its why when you woke up today there was no raid on trumps home.
Posted on 8/10/22 at 3:36 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Everything I have seen says that it was nothing like this. Guys in suits knocked politely on the door, since the Secret Service had already coordinated and knew they were coming.
the people in suites were the doj lawyers.
You sure do lie a shite load or are an ignorant fricker.
There werent just people in suites as you can see the same ss agent is in two of the pics.
This post was edited on 8/10/22 at 3:44 pm
Posted on 8/10/22 at 3:37 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
The report says the affidavit said the documents were in the safe.
The safe was empty.
The warrant was based upon a fraudulent affidavit.
Game. Set. MATCH.
quote:
The warrant was based upon a fraudulent affidavit. Same as with the fisa app and the steee dossier.
With nobody yet still standing n the way of this bullsh*t, that's the way they'll continue to roll, won't they?
Phantom affidavits...Kabuki Judge FISA apps...Gestapo 4A search & seizure violations.
WHAT pesky Constitution??
Posted on 8/10/22 at 3:39 pm to jatilen
Except when they show up, those docs are not in the safe. Was the warrant specific to the records room, Trumps office and wherever the safe is?
If after they go in and the docs are not where they said they would be were they allowed by the warrant to ransacked the house?
If after they go in and the docs are not where they said they would be were they allowed by the warrant to ransacked the house?
Posted on 8/10/22 at 3:39 pm to dgnx6
MK was right for once. They werent looking for documents they already knew about and have already seen - and are probably declassified anyway. They needed an excuse to rifle through his personal shite so they could pin literally anything on him to stop him from running again.
If Trump is elected in 2024, most of these people are completely fricked.
If Trump is elected in 2024, most of these people are completely fricked.
Posted on 8/10/22 at 3:39 pm to jatilen
quote:
from an FBI confidential human source,
And the layers of lies begin.
Page 5 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News