- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Milton Friedman quotes on protective tariffs
Posted on 8/19/23 at 10:34 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Posted on 8/19/23 at 10:34 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
It's a shame you are such a deuche, because I agree with several points the article made. 80% of the board doesn't even bother to read, or acknowledge anything you post these days
Posted on 8/19/23 at 10:37 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Force them to advance or die out.
LOL! WOW!
Posted on 8/19/23 at 10:40 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
I don't think you can fix it, were better off letting those bloodlines die out
I disagree. They’re a shot ton of menial jobs. It is just more convenient for that portion of the population to get paid for staying home.
Posted on 8/19/23 at 10:42 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
I disagree. They’re a shot ton of menial jobs.
Theres millions that can't be filled by native grown Americans because they don't want to work.
Since Americans don't work, we import foreigners. In the end, you'll subsidize woke corporations who hire non native workers.
Posted on 8/19/23 at 10:43 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
But for such governmental input, does such an evolution occur?
You will not get an answer to this question from the ‘free trade’ absolutists. They ignore the cause and effect of the welfare state and pretend it never happened.
Posted on 8/19/23 at 10:47 am to Jjdoc
quote:quote:
Force them to advance or die out.
LOL! WOW!
Always good to see you out yourself, JjClinton.
Posted on 8/19/23 at 10:47 am to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
They ignore the cause and effect of the welfare state
Absolutely not, but corporate protectionism is just as bad.
Posted on 8/19/23 at 11:03 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Absolutely not, but corporate protectionism is just as bad.
What about Communist nations do you not get? Free Trade was sold as a way to disarm nations and end wars by FDR. It was sold as a way that would bring our style of Gov to the world.
None of you will acknowledge that it is a 2 way street. They (communist nations) have had more of an effect on the USA society and influence on how we are governed.
ESG is a CCP creation. I can list business after business that literally have implemented the CCP ideals into our society.
It has to end.
Posted on 8/19/23 at 11:12 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Absolutely not, but corporate protectionism is just as bad.
Cool, so how’s your crusade to end the welfare state going? Seeing a lot of progress?
Posted on 8/19/23 at 11:14 am to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
Cool, so how’s your crusade to end the welfare state going?
Not sure what you mean. Do you only support issues you can personally impact?
Posted on 8/19/23 at 11:17 am to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
Cool, so how’s your crusade to end the welfare state going? Seeing a lot of progress?
No. The old GOPE way lead to a bigger welfare state.
Trump saw a big reduction in people on welfare.
Posted on 8/19/23 at 11:18 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Cool, so how’s your crusade to end the welfare state going?
Not sure what you mean
That has nothing to do with
quote:
Do you only support issues you can personally impact?
Posted on 8/19/23 at 11:18 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Not sure what you mean. Do you only support issues you can personally impact?
Well shouldn’t the welfare state be the thing you focus on correcting since it’s likely the biggest culprit in creating the class of people who refuse to work and gain skills?
It’s just weird that ‘free trade’ absolutists rarely ever attack the welfare state.
Posted on 8/19/23 at 11:23 am to Tigers0891
quote:Like we did to Russia when they invaded Ukraine? I remember when the Potsto said their economy would collapse in a few months. Still hasn’t worked.
Some people want to put the pressure and screws to the communists that are enacting human rights abuses and destabilizing the Pacific.
This post was edited on 8/19/23 at 11:33 am
Posted on 8/19/23 at 11:32 am to Jjdoc
quote:Opposite actually. Cultural intrusion is a big part of why the USSR failed. Would have never happened had cultural mixing not occurred. The same proves is playing out in China today. You’re just too ignorant to know it. I’ve seen it first hand.
None of you will acknowledge that it is a 2 way street. They (communist nations) have had more of an effect on the USA society and influence on how we are governed.
quote:Maybe, but it’s 2023. Calling for social isolation isn’t going to be practical.
ESG is a CCP creation. I can list business after business that literally have implemented the CCP ideals into our society.
If cultural isolationism works so well, why isn’t N Korea successful?
Posted on 8/19/23 at 11:37 am to Taxing Authority
quote:
quote:
None of you will acknowledge that it is a 2 way street. They (communist nations) have had more of an effect on the USA society and influence on how we are governed.
Opposite actually. Cultural intrusion is a big part of why the USSR failed. Would have never happened had cultural mixing not occurred. The same proves is playing out in China today. You’re just too ignorant to know it. I’ve seen it first hand.
I never once mentioned cultural.
quote:
quote:
ESG is a CCP creation. I can list business after business that literally have implemented the CCP ideals into our society.
Maybe, but it’s 2023. Calling for social isolation isn’t going to be practical.
Nobody called for isolationism of any kind.
quote:
If cultural isolationism works so well, why isn’t N Korea successful?
Has nothing to do with what I stated.
Posted on 8/19/23 at 11:40 am to Jjdoc
quote:
I never once mentioned cultural.
quote:I even quoted it.
Nobody called for isolationism of any kind.
quote:Absolutely. But i understand why you won’t attempt an answer.
Has nothing to do with what I stated.
Posted on 8/19/23 at 11:40 am to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
They ignore the cause and effect of the welfare state and pretend it never happened.
You don't try to fix government failure by adding more government.
Free trade types want less socialism (reducing welfare and redistributive policies)
Posted on 8/19/23 at 11:49 am to Taxing Authority
quote:
quote:
I never once mentioned cultural.
what do you the woke movement is? Economics?
I never mentioned woke either. I stated that the CCP has had more influence on our nation than we have theirs.
For example, the NBA and how the censor their players or coaches with the threat of removal.
quote:
quote:
Nobody called for isolationism of any kind.
I even quoted it.
You did not quote me saying isolationism. I never stated that.
quote:
quote:
Has nothing to do with what I stated.
Absolutely. But i understand why you won’t attempt an answer.
Because it does not pertain to what I stated.
Posted on 8/19/23 at 11:49 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
First of all, ALL taxes are bad.
But if we have to live with taxes to fund the federal government this debate is about what are the best form of taxes to accomplish that goal and at the same time not hinder but maximize economic growth.
Sure there is an valid argument against tariffs. There is also a valid argument against income taxes, capital gains taxes, payroll taxes, etc. When either form of tax is used where high economic entropy exists it becomes detrimental to the national economy. The opposite is true when a tax is applied appropriately. Seek low economic entropy and apply taxes appropriately. Blanket policies against any form of economic tool weakens the position for the economic leaders that have to implement economic policy.
Let me give you an example how tariffs worked when Trump applied them to Aluminum and steel.
The economic consensus after the tariffs were applied on Aluminum and steel was that import prices would increase. But the opposite happened. Why? The BLS attributes it to lower fuel prices (because of Trump's energy policies) as shown below. But I would argue it is more than that. The People Bank of China and European Central Bank responded to U.S. tariffs on imported Aluminum and steel with manipulating their currency. They printed. Foreign bank currency manipulation in response to just tariffs on Aluminum and steel and a corresponding stronger dollar decreased import prices.
As you can see these tariffs were applied appropriately. They accomplished two goals: protected industry for national security reasons and best of all it strengthened the dollar due to foreign currency manipulation making your dollar more valuable.
It's about balance. Of course tariffs can be bad if misapplied. They also can serve as an important economic tool for the benefit of a nation when applied with that goal in mind.
But if we have to live with taxes to fund the federal government this debate is about what are the best form of taxes to accomplish that goal and at the same time not hinder but maximize economic growth.
Sure there is an valid argument against tariffs. There is also a valid argument against income taxes, capital gains taxes, payroll taxes, etc. When either form of tax is used where high economic entropy exists it becomes detrimental to the national economy. The opposite is true when a tax is applied appropriately. Seek low economic entropy and apply taxes appropriately. Blanket policies against any form of economic tool weakens the position for the economic leaders that have to implement economic policy.
Let me give you an example how tariffs worked when Trump applied them to Aluminum and steel.
The economic consensus after the tariffs were applied on Aluminum and steel was that import prices would increase. But the opposite happened. Why? The BLS attributes it to lower fuel prices (because of Trump's energy policies) as shown below. But I would argue it is more than that. The People Bank of China and European Central Bank responded to U.S. tariffs on imported Aluminum and steel with manipulating their currency. They printed. Foreign bank currency manipulation in response to just tariffs on Aluminum and steel and a corresponding stronger dollar decreased import prices.
As you can see these tariffs were applied appropriately. They accomplished two goals: protected industry for national security reasons and best of all it strengthened the dollar due to foreign currency manipulation making your dollar more valuable.
It's about balance. Of course tariffs can be bad if misapplied. They also can serve as an important economic tool for the benefit of a nation when applied with that goal in mind.
This post was edited on 8/19/23 at 11:52 am
Popular
Back to top


0






