Started By
Message

Medicare is the “Oxygen” that Keeps Rural Hospitals In Operation

Posted on 10/22/26 at 1:16 pm
Posted by RFK
Mar-a-Lago
Member since May 2012
3467 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 1:16 pm
I am always surprised when so many in Louisiana are against Medicare/medicaid (according to polls). They are a rural state with an aging poor population.

Rural hospitals derive between 1/3 and 2/3 of their revenue from Medicare. Reducing Medicare will gut these hospitals which means elderly and infirm will have to drive father, endure longer wait times, and overall see reduced care.

This also happens at a time when there is an increase in cancers in states with petrochemical economies.

While I don’t think doctors need to be paid more, the physician fee schedule is about to automatically reduce, which will have a domino effect on the overall quality of care.

Those with elderly loved ones (or those who will be elderly themselves within 20 years) should caution not to vote away their rights.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
118601 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

I am always surprised when so many in Louisiana are against Medicare/medicaid (according to polls). They are a rural state with an aging poor population.


They are unconstitutional.

Period.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
84826 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 1:20 pm to
Would you go for making sure Medicare is only available for citizens and scrubbing out all fraud and waste out of it?
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
112150 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 1:21 pm to
Louisiana once had a charity hospital system that was sort of actually a model of rather efficient progressive government services.
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
145063 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

I am always surprised when so many in Louisiana are against Medicare/medicaid (according to polls). They are a rural state with an aging poor population.


That's why we had a Charity Hospital system. I'm sure Blanco and Nagin pocked the rebuild money after Katrina.

Looks like the system other than the big hospital in NO is still around. Poor people already get free health care.



This post was edited on 10/22/26 at 1:26 pm
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
Member since May 2012
62350 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 1:22 pm to
Rural America would die overnight without federal programs
Posted by lsuconnman
Baton rouge
Member since Feb 2007
5871 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 1:27 pm to
You answered your own question. They’re overly subsidized. Nobody using those rural hospitals will pay paying for the services they use.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
60845 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

Rural hospitals derive between 1/3 and 2/3 of their revenue from Medicare. Reducing Medicare will gut these hospitals which means elderly and infirm will have to drive father, endure longer wait times, and overall see reduced care.


Medicare and the AMA's dickery with medical school enrollment to limit seats (in order to make sure there's not a glut of doctors) in the 80s and into the mid-2000s have combined to skew medical costs. Medicare and Medicaid fund demand of medical services while the AMA fricked over supply of medical professionals.

Just like with mortgage rates, the debt and deficits, there is no "easy" and "quick" answer and any worthwhile answer is going to come with a lot of pain before there is relief.
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
25501 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

not to vote away their rights.


Healthcare is not a right. Living in the remotes is not a right.

Rural health care especially the CAH system needs a complete overhaul. Instead of 40-50 bed hospitals with a daily census below 5 they should become “stabilize and ship” ERs.
Posted by Judnnc
Member since Jun 2025
1087 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

Would you go for making sure Medicare is only available for citizens and scrubbing out all fraud and waste out of it?


I'd go for if you didn't save your shite during life, you are on your own.
Posted by theliontamer
Chicago
Member since Nov 2015
2657 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 1:52 pm to
Yea, if we stopped funding these impoverished areas, the people would move away and disperse across the country. Instead, they group together in the rural south and make the area undesirable to anyone else.
Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
21171 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 1:58 pm to
Hospitals are not much different than say student loans or government backed loans. They all get money to easily thus driving up future costs. There is very little reason to be competitive when easy money comes along
Posted by minister of truth
Somewhere new for 6-12 months
Member since May 2022
1967 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

While I don’t think doctors need to be paid more, the physician fee schedule is about to automatically reduce,


our fees have been coming down for years. Doctor's fees are not what has driven healthcare costs constantly higher.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
46394 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

That's why we had a Charity Hospital system


We still have a charity system. It’s just run by public/private entities.
Posted by SloaneRanger
Upper Hurstville
Member since Jan 2014
14855 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 2:02 pm to
Big difference between Medicare and Medicaid. Medicaid is eaten up with fraud and has been a disaster for most of the states that expanded it.
Posted by Jcharles
Member since Sep 2026
122 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 2:25 pm to
Now do Rouses and SNAP
Posted by JimEverett
Member since May 2020
2826 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 2:45 pm to
50 years ago Medicaid accounted for 10% of total U.S. healthcare costs. Today it accounts for over 18%.

50 years ago Medicare accounted for 10% of total U.S. healthcare costs. Today it accounts for 22%.

How can you say people are against it? People have voted for doubling both.
Posted by The_Duke
Member since Nov 2016
4769 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

Yea, if we stopped funding these impoverished areas, the people would move away and disperse across the country. Instead, they group together in the rural south and make the area undesirable to anyone else.


Poor elderly people with no resources would move from the cheapest place in the country, the rural South, to somewhere that is more expensive?

Is that really what you think will happen?
Posted by goatmilker
With Chinese expect nationalism
Member since Feb 2009
78437 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 2:54 pm to
Nice timing
Rampant Medicare fraud
"Medicare is a beautiful thing" rfk
Posted by theliontamer
Chicago
Member since Nov 2015
2657 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 2:55 pm to
The elderly would likely stay, but the young would be forced to leave.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram