- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Let’s address this mail in voting Fraud scare a lot of you are suggesting could.
Posted on 9/2/20 at 5:52 am to AustinKnight
Posted on 9/2/20 at 5:52 am to AustinKnight
quote:
How in the world could anyone suggest he(Biden) would get 100%( or such a large percentage more) of the mail in voters.
You’ve missed the point.
Posted on 9/2/20 at 5:56 am to AustinKnight
quote:
How in the world could anyone suggest he(Biden) would get 100%
How in the world could YOU suggest that 100% is needed in order to throw the election?
Posted on 9/2/20 at 6:02 am to davyjones
quote:
just how many postmen are woke enough to not only risk their employment, but also their freedom?
You must not be familiar with how these unions work.
The postmen could just say the ballots were misplaced or never received and their union lawyers will go to bat for them 100% of the time and shoot down any criticism of them as “extorting the working man.”
They’re fully-protected to do an intentionally shitty job.
Posted on 9/2/20 at 6:04 am to AustinKnight
quote:
Happen. How in the world could anyone suggest he(Biden) would get 100%( or such a large percentage more) of the mail in voters. That laughable, absurd, and well just plain stupid.
He doesn’t need 100% he just needs enough in the right districts to flip them. Google ballot harvesting
quote:
Even if there is fraud which there will be at best it will be 2/3 for Biden and 1/3 for Trump and in no way be enough to stop Trump from winning.
This might be the dumbest thing I’ve read on this website. People like you are the reason republicans have been destroyed for the past few decades. More worried about being nice and what everyone thinks about you than saving our country
Posted on 9/2/20 at 6:04 am to griswold
You guys are misunderstanding the scheme. It's not about real people receiving ballots and voting twice--once by mail and once in person.
It's about voter rolls. If you haven't been paying attention, there are dozens of lawsuits all over the country trying to purge voter rolls for people who are dead or have moved from the state. The Democrats are fighting every one of these lawsuits. Ask yourself why?
They know exactly who these people are and how to harvest their ballots. So you may have Joe Smith who moved from North Carolina to Florida 10 years ago. But he is still on North Carolina's voter rolls. So now Joe Smith votes in Florida and someone harvests his ballot in North Carolina and submits that one too.
There is absolutely no system in place to check whether someone has voted in another state or if a dead person votes by mail. These are hundreds of thousands of votes across the country.
It's about voter rolls. If you haven't been paying attention, there are dozens of lawsuits all over the country trying to purge voter rolls for people who are dead or have moved from the state. The Democrats are fighting every one of these lawsuits. Ask yourself why?
They know exactly who these people are and how to harvest their ballots. So you may have Joe Smith who moved from North Carolina to Florida 10 years ago. But he is still on North Carolina's voter rolls. So now Joe Smith votes in Florida and someone harvests his ballot in North Carolina and submits that one too.
There is absolutely no system in place to check whether someone has voted in another state or if a dead person votes by mail. These are hundreds of thousands of votes across the country.
This post was edited on 9/2/20 at 6:35 am
Posted on 9/2/20 at 6:31 am to AustinKnight
quote:
Happen. How in the world could anyone suggest he(Biden) would get 100%( or such a large percentage more) of the mail in voters. That laughable, absurd, and well just plain stupid.
Even if there is fraud which there will be at best it will be 2/3 for Biden and 1/3 for Trump and in no way be enough to stop Trump from winning.
This is devoid of basic logic.
Posted on 9/2/20 at 6:34 am to AustinKnight
quote:
How in the world could anyone suggest he(Biden) would get 100%( or such a large percentage more) of the mail in voters. That laughable, absurd, and well just plain stupid.
i dont think you understand the fraud aspect of it....its the fact they democrats will have loads of already filled ballets for biden ready to be counted once they see Trumps final numbers....this is the fraud we are talking about
Posted on 9/2/20 at 6:35 am to davyjones
quote:
Just one guy's opinion here, but I don't think it's gonna work out anything like the Dems hope it would.
They want to abolish the electoral college...
They lose big, but win popular vote...happened twice...so they feel justified "whatever means necessary"
California, NY are the problem...too many liberal Democrat stacked on top of each other in these states
Posted on 9/2/20 at 6:38 am to Big Scrub TX
quote:
It's a net benefit for Trump - the olds are more motivated to vote and know how to remotely. The youngs barely know what an envelope is.
Hell most young people would probably photograph it with their phone and try to text it.
Posted on 9/2/20 at 6:51 am to AustinKnight
quote:
How in the world could anyone suggest he(Biden) would get 100%( or such a large percentage more) of the mail in voters. That laughable, absurd, and well just plain stupid.
Even if there is fraud which there will be at best it will be 2/3 for Biden and 1/3 for Trump and in no way be enough to stop Trump from winning.
Just continue to listen to Biden for the next month he is even confusing old people And the mentally handicapped.
Have a drink relax this train ain’t stoppin.
No one is saying 100% will go to Biden. What the worry is though is over the ease of someone just grabbing ballots not meant for them (out of the garbage can in an apartment complex mail room, for instance), filling them out then sending them in as if they were. This becomes even more important in toss-up areas.
"Have a drink and relax" is exactly the thing to do if you want massive voter fraud.
Posted on 9/2/20 at 6:53 am to Richleau
quote:Do you think that if you mail in your vote for Biden 3 days before the election and then go vote in person for Biden that some legal action is going to be taken against you in, say, Philadelphia? You can claim you never filled out a vote by mail. How are they going to prove you did, and how are they going to ultimately discount that vote?
Put you in jail. It has happened before
Posted on 9/2/20 at 7:07 am to AustinKnight
Look, the concern for me about large scale vote-by-mail isn’t even that cheating will occur. It’s that, with almost 100% certainty, the losing side will use it as a flashpoint to claim that cheating occurred.
Let’s flash forward to the election; put yourself in the american people’s shoes. Let’s say there’s an even moderately close election. What we know, with absolute 100% certainty, is that a lot of people in American procrastinate. And that means that a lot of mail in ballots will be put in the mail literally the day of the election. So they’ll be rolling into polling stations after Election Day. Now assume that 30% of the country votes by mail. Some votes get lost, others delivered to the wrong addresses, and others just simply returned to sender. Not for any even mildly nefarious purpose mind you, but just because processing tens of millions of pieces of mail will inevitably lead to some errors (as we’ve long known is the status quo for our postal system). And when that happens, every documented instance of a mailing failure will be flooded into social media like the tide of a megatsunami.
Do you really think, with this reality in the backdrop, that there is any chance that the supporters of the losing side simply shrug their shoulders and say, “oh well, that’s democracy”? Is there any chance that the losing side of a close election where 30% of votes are calculated by mail will accept the results of that election?
Absolutely, 100% not. If trump looses, the response will be, “local postal workers are hiding ballots” and isolated cases where mail got lost will be selectively pushed to support the narrative. If biden loses, the response will be, Trump’s postmaster general rigged the election” and isolated cases where vote sitting machines were phased out will be selectively pushed to support the narrative. Hell, if we’ve got a nail biter that still has not been conclusively decided a full week after the election, you can be absolutely, 100% certain that BOTH sides, simultaneously, will be accusing the other side of cheating. And anyone disputing that fundamental reality either has their head 10 feet under sand, or they’re just be willfully blind for the sake of promoting a predetermined narrative.
Long story short, this issue is almost certainly going to be a major flashpoint for any election result that isn’t a complete annihilation one direction or another. So wanting to discourage people from voting by mail in order to minimize the inevitable fallout seems like a perfectly rational strategy to me.
Let’s flash forward to the election; put yourself in the american people’s shoes. Let’s say there’s an even moderately close election. What we know, with absolute 100% certainty, is that a lot of people in American procrastinate. And that means that a lot of mail in ballots will be put in the mail literally the day of the election. So they’ll be rolling into polling stations after Election Day. Now assume that 30% of the country votes by mail. Some votes get lost, others delivered to the wrong addresses, and others just simply returned to sender. Not for any even mildly nefarious purpose mind you, but just because processing tens of millions of pieces of mail will inevitably lead to some errors (as we’ve long known is the status quo for our postal system). And when that happens, every documented instance of a mailing failure will be flooded into social media like the tide of a megatsunami.
Do you really think, with this reality in the backdrop, that there is any chance that the supporters of the losing side simply shrug their shoulders and say, “oh well, that’s democracy”? Is there any chance that the losing side of a close election where 30% of votes are calculated by mail will accept the results of that election?
Absolutely, 100% not. If trump looses, the response will be, “local postal workers are hiding ballots” and isolated cases where mail got lost will be selectively pushed to support the narrative. If biden loses, the response will be, Trump’s postmaster general rigged the election” and isolated cases where vote sitting machines were phased out will be selectively pushed to support the narrative. Hell, if we’ve got a nail biter that still has not been conclusively decided a full week after the election, you can be absolutely, 100% certain that BOTH sides, simultaneously, will be accusing the other side of cheating. And anyone disputing that fundamental reality either has their head 10 feet under sand, or they’re just be willfully blind for the sake of promoting a predetermined narrative.
Long story short, this issue is almost certainly going to be a major flashpoint for any election result that isn’t a complete annihilation one direction or another. So wanting to discourage people from voting by mail in order to minimize the inevitable fallout seems like a perfectly rational strategy to me.
Posted on 9/2/20 at 8:12 am to tenderfoot tigah
quote:
I was just about to post that.
Thats cuz u woke baw
Posted on 9/2/20 at 8:18 am to AustinKnight
Are you stupid? We’ve regularly had precincts with over 100% reporting in elections and those votes are counted. We’ve seen local elections overturned in mail in votes.
They don’t care about appearances anymore. They’ve already tried to jail and impeach Trump and you think they are going to hold back if given the opportunity to steal this election?
They don’t care about appearances anymore. They’ve already tried to jail and impeach Trump and you think they are going to hold back if given the opportunity to steal this election?
Posted on 9/2/20 at 8:27 am to Ex-Popcorn
quote:EXACTLY!
You guys are misunderstanding the scheme. It's not about real people receiving ballots and voting twice--once by mail and once in person.
It's about voter rolls. If you haven't been paying attention, there are dozens of lawsuits all over the country trying to purge voter rolls for people who are dead or have moved from the state. The Democrats are fighting every one of these lawsuits. Ask yourself why?
It is also about "finding" mountains of ballots in car trunks, rental trucks, warehouses, and government offices in COMMUNIST-prone districts..
Dem-Marxists do like all Marxists before them do - THEY CHEAT LIKE HELL.
and on the scale they have in mind TO NOT VOTE IN THE MANNER THE USA HAS VOTED FOR OVER 200 YEARS, they will practically guarantee civil war type violence. LIKE THEY ALREADY SUPPORT as they lie through their fricking teeth.
THAT is the truth - and I for one will not be limiting my response if they do this.
Posted on 9/2/20 at 8:36 am to JJJimmyJimJames
Don't forget what happened in SoCal congressional districts where Republicans were declared winners on election night, only to be overturned by ballot harvesting.
Posted on 9/2/20 at 8:54 am to MrLSU
quote:
If I get a mail in ballot then I will send it in the mail and then I'll show up in person and vote again = 2 votes to the average Trump supporter who will only vote one time.
I vote in advance every election and a couple of times I've gone with my wife to the polls. The rolls always show that I've already voted. Votes are registered to the person at their address. You can't vote twice.
Posted on 9/2/20 at 8:59 am to TBoy
You lie way too much.
Some can absolutely vote twice.
There is no need to lie.
Some can absolutely vote twice.
There is no need to lie.
quote:
However, it’s easy to be registered in more than place. Many people are registered in more than one state. When you move and register to vote, you’re supposed to give the address or county where you were previously registered. That notification, in turn, is supposed to trigger a cancellation of your former registration. But not every state bothers to report the new registrations. A lot of this happens because the Constitution give the power to oversee elections to the states. There is no central database of registered voters.
Posted on 9/2/20 at 9:08 am to TBoy
quote:
I vote in advance every election and a couple of times I've gone with my wife to the polls. The rolls always show that I've already voted. Votes are registered to the person at their address. You can't vote twice.
Not if they haven't counted them until AFTER you've already voted in-person. I can assure you, they aren't sitting there pilfering through all of the mail-in ballots to see if the person already voted.
Posted on 9/2/20 at 9:11 am to AustinKnight
Depends on the rules and where you do it. In Louisiana it may be a waste of time but on MN, OH, PA MI if the rules are that it has to be on Election Day, I can see lots of fraud. Mail a ballot on Monday and vote on Tuesday.....chaos insues, you know, unintended consequences. It will be the clusterfrick of clusterfricks. People will get hurt and there will be violence. There will be blood.
I guarantee it. A clusterfrick on a scale that we have never seem in this country sice 1860 - 1865.
I guarantee it. A clusterfrick on a scale that we have never seem in this country sice 1860 - 1865.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News