- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Let’s address this mail in voting Fraud scare a lot of you are suggesting could.
Posted on 9/2/20 at 9:13 am to AustinKnight
Posted on 9/2/20 at 9:13 am to AustinKnight
quote:
Hmmm now that sounds ridiculous considering they check you off by name when you go in person but your name isn’t checked off when it’s mailed allowing you to vote twice.
You mail your vote in Sunday night, then go vote in person Tuesday morning. Two votes.
No way to stop that.
This post was edited on 9/2/20 at 9:15 am
0
Posted on 9/2/20 at 9:31 am to davyjones
quote:
Just one guy's opinion here, but I don't think it's gonna work out anything like the Dems hope it would.
Are you willing to take the chance?
Posted on 9/2/20 at 9:37 am to AustinKnight
Why anyone would trust the USPS with something as important as voting is mind-boggling. Hell, they can't even get 2-day shipping right for Amazon.
Posted on 9/2/20 at 9:43 am to AustinKnight
Mail in votes arrive in your mailbox addressed to someone who lived there prior to you. An honest Republican would discard it. A dishonest Democrat like you would fill it out and return it as though it was theirs. I also worry about the USPS being a majority Democrat group.
Posted on 9/2/20 at 9:57 am to davyjones
"How many postmen are woke enough..."? Remember those 30,000+ BOXES of ballots that were found in an Illinois warehouse after the Congressional elections? A Democratic state. And it's not necessarily individual postmen. My mail deliverer, a black middle aged female, told me how simple the process is: When a ballot is received in a post office mail room, there is the normal date stamp on it. The ballots received in a set period of time are then boxed & transported to a local county clerk's office. NO date stamp is required by that office, verifying receipt. She said " look at what Party runs the nation's largest cities.In those cities, the county clerk is almost always a Democrat. The clerk has the power ...because if there is a supervisor, that person is also a well entrenched Democrat..to hold off counting ballots till the mandatory due date has expired. Then the box reappears for counting & those ballots are then tossed as being received too late." She says this happens all over the country.
Posted on 9/2/20 at 10:02 am to AustinKnight
Democrats are already prep people for them to cheat with mail in ballots. Election night is going to be crazy .
Posted on 9/2/20 at 10:06 am to AustinKnight
quote:
Even if there is fraud which there will be at best it will be 2/3 for Biden and 1/3 for Trump and in no way be enough to stop Trump from winning.
Are you oblivious to current events, or just stupid?
2 recent elections have thrown out over 70% of all mail in ballots for fraud. Why can't you morons ever bother doing any research?
Posted on 9/2/20 at 10:07 am to AustinKnight
quote:The issue isn't the percentage of actual voters and who they are voting for. The issue is with fraudulent votes and those going primarily for Biden to make up and possibly overtake the "landslide" numbers that many are expecting.
How in the world could anyone suggest he(Biden) would get 100%( or such a large percentage more) of the mail in voters.
Posted on 9/2/20 at 10:13 am to AustinKnight
Deep state has already Probably had me vote for Biden via mail. They will then arrest me/anyone for voting for trump in person. ThatS a good way to silence the opposition
That’s where I see the mail in voting. They get a two-for-one:
1. Put me in jail, claiming that I voted twice when I only voted once.
2. Count all illegal votes for joe to have 450 million votes for joe in a 330 million-person country.
That’s where I see the mail in voting. They get a two-for-one:
1. Put me in jail, claiming that I voted twice when I only voted once.
2. Count all illegal votes for joe to have 450 million votes for joe in a 330 million-person country.
Posted on 9/2/20 at 10:35 am to funnystuff
Look every state is different and maybe the more liberal the states the easier it is to get away with a fraudulent voting system and probably Trump wasn't going to win that state or take those electoral votes. I understand the importance the swing states have but I believe Trump wins convincingly. A lot of mid range Democrats don't even trust Biden in today's climate.
Below is Texas guidelines for 2020 presidential election. If you know your current states post em. It'll be interesting to see.
"Election day is Tuesday, November 3, 2020. Texas offers absentee ballots by mail to voters who will be unable to vote in person. All other voters are expected to vote in person. Texas offers early voting."
Below is Texas guidelines for 2020 presidential election. If you know your current states post em. It'll be interesting to see.
"Election day is Tuesday, November 3, 2020. Texas offers absentee ballots by mail to voters who will be unable to vote in person. All other voters are expected to vote in person. Texas offers early voting."
This post was edited on 9/2/20 at 10:39 am
Posted on 9/2/20 at 10:49 am to AustinKnight
quote:
Happen. How in the world could anyone suggest he(Biden) would get 100%( or such a large percentage more) of the mail in voters. That laughable, absurd, and well just plain stupid.
Even if there is fraud which there will be at best it will be 2/3 for Biden and 1/3 for Trump and in no way be enough to stop Trump from winning.
Just continue to listen to Biden for the next month he is even confusing old people And the mentally handicapped.
Have a drink relax this train ain’t stoppin.
I am on board with you. I think people are under the impression that a dem/liberal can make hundreds or thousands of copies of a single mail in ballot and submit them and they will get counted.
Fraud, as I understand it, means they have to steal or otherwise obtain legit mail in ballots. They can steal them from mailboxes, talk old people at nursing homes into giving them up, etc... but they cannot simply "create" hundreds of thousands or millions of mail in ballots.
Maybe I am off base but this is based on a few reliable sources???
Posted on 9/2/20 at 10:58 am to AustinKnight
quote:
probably Trump wasn't going to win that state or take those electoral votes
Thinking it is just about the presidential election is foolish.
These districts where dead republicans will vote for dem hORs will continue the obstruction and sham impeachment’s.
Cmon man.
Posted on 9/2/20 at 11:00 am to AustinKnight
The fact that you are so easily dismissing voter fraud, regardless of who benefits from said fraud, is alarming and disgusting.
Posted on 9/2/20 at 11:00 am to Tridentds
quote:All you need is the voter rolls and boom unusually high voter numbers will occur.
Fraud, as I understand it, means they have to steal or otherwise obtain legit mail in ballots. They can steal them from mailboxes, talk old people at nursing homes into giving them up, etc... but they cannot simply "create" hundreds of thousands or millions of mail in ballots.
Posted on 9/2/20 at 11:01 am to AustinKnight
quote:
"Election day is Tuesday, November 3, 2020. Texas offers absentee ballots by mail to voters who will be unable to vote in person. All other voters are expected to vote in person. Texas offers early voting."
Well yeah. Texas has a republican governor and AG.
Posted on 9/2/20 at 11:02 am to Tridentds
That's my thoughts as well and I know most of these jokers above have done more investigative work on different types of fraud in elections but IMO that's why Trump has been mentioning it for sometime to keep them as honest(as can be) where in other elections people wouldn't say shite.
Put it this way if Trump loses to Sleepy fricking Joe through some mail in fraud he hasn't done his job with rally's and some form of a debate. I mean a 12 year old can throw shade at Joe's policies and cause him to trip on his words.
Put it this way if Trump loses to Sleepy fricking Joe through some mail in fraud he hasn't done his job with rally's and some form of a debate. I mean a 12 year old can throw shade at Joe's policies and cause him to trip on his words.
This post was edited on 9/2/20 at 11:06 am
Posted on 9/2/20 at 11:03 am to AustinKnight
quote:
Let’s address this mail in voting Fraud scare a lot of you are suggesting could.
Why don't we start with admitting that if you can go to the grocery store you can go vote, and then quit worrying about mail in voting. the fact that we all understand that there is no greater risk in voting than any other thing we've been doing for months now ought to be a clue that someone wants to do it for potentially nefarious reasons.
Posted on 9/2/20 at 11:18 am to AustinKnight
quote:
That's my thoughts as well and I know most of these jokers above have done more investigative work on different types of fraud in elections but IMO that's why Trump has been mentioning it for sometime to keep them as honest(as can be) where in other elections people wouldn't say shite.
Put it this way if Trump loses to Sleepy fricking Joe through some mail in fraud he hasn't done his job with rally's and some form of a debate. I mean a 12 year old can throw shade at Joe's policies and cause him to trip on his words.
you are either hopelessly naive or a lying hack
quote:
Donald Trump owes his victory in the Electoral College to three states he won by the smallest number of votes: Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan. So it's fair to say that the 2016 presidential election was decided by about 77,000 votes out of than 136 million ballots cast. According to the final tallies, Trump won Pennsylvania by 0.7 percentage points (44,292 votes), Wisconsin by 0.7 points (22,748 votes), Michigan by 0.2 points (10,704 votes). If Clinton had won all three states, she would have won the Electoral College 278 to 260. She fell short in all three, of course, and that's why we are now getting accustomed to the reality of President-elect Donald J. Trump. (This article has been updated to reflect final results.)
LINK
Election wont be finalized for a few days to a week, you dont think the Dem operatives can find votes in key districts to turn a loss into a win?
Posted on 9/2/20 at 11:21 am to AustinKnight
quote:
How in the world could anyone suggest he(Biden) would get 100%( or such a large percentage more) of the mail in voters.
Straw man is made of straw. Nobody is saying that.
They bring votes in until the Democrat is ahead. That is the entire vote harvesting scam. They did it for the mid-terms in California House races - blatantly, openly, just to see if anyone would notice/care/do anything about it (the answers are yes/no/no).
If that doesn't bother you, recall, the Dems' lead in the House is Representatives IS their lead in California - period.
Posted on 9/2/20 at 11:53 am to RPC4LSU
quote:
Just one guy's opinion here, but I don't think it's gonna work out anything like the Dems hope it would.
Are you willing to take the chance?
Am I willing to take the chance? What would you like me to do exactly? What would you like anyone to do, preemptively?? Other than the completely legitimate legal efforts currently underway in many areas??
This post was edited on 9/2/20 at 11:56 am
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News