- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Landlord tells Harvard grad student to move after roommates found her legally-owned guns
Posted on 11/30/18 at 9:41 pm to BayouBlitz
Posted on 11/30/18 at 9:41 pm to BayouBlitz
quote:
So?
Unless the lease said no guns, the landlord breached the contract.
2
Posted on 11/30/18 at 10:10 pm to Bestbank Tiger
quote:
Unless the lease said no guns, the landlord breached the contract.
Massachusetts, like pretty much all states in the north east, has strong anti-retaliation laws when it comes to landlords who attempt to evict tennants for causes other than clear breaches of the rental agreement. If this landlord is terminating a lease on the condition of a tenant who is lawfully exercising an individual right, they have opened themselves to significant civil penalties.
Posted on 11/30/18 at 10:10 pm to Bestbank Tiger
quote:
Unless the lease said no guns, the landlord breached the contract.
quote:
[quote]Unless the lease said no guns, the landlord breached the contract.
bullshite!!
No lease can strip you of your CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS!
Imagine if the lease said, "No Christianity practiced". Same thing!
Posted on 11/30/18 at 10:30 pm to greygoose
quote:
No lease can strip you of your CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS!
Uh what? The Constitution protects you from the government, not other private individuals.
Posted on 11/30/18 at 10:46 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
The landlord has the right to control activities on his private property.
Question: Does a bakery have the right to control who they provide services to?
Posted on 11/30/18 at 11:11 pm to Thunder
quote:
Let me educate you on properly secured..... When i was little all guns were hung on racks fully loaded and if you even looked at that rack for over 3 seconds you knew you wouldn't be able to sit down for a week. That is properly stored..... Didnt matter if it was at home or over at an uncles house same thing applied......
Same in our house, every relative I had, and the houses of just about everyone I knew as a kid. When did all this securely stored in a gun safe mentality evolve?
Posted on 11/30/18 at 11:31 pm to EA6B
quote:
When did all this securely stored in a gun safe mentality evolve?
When too many incompetent people became parents and wanted the schools and tv to raise their kids instead of taking responsibility for themselves.
Posted on 12/1/18 at 3:26 am to TenWheelsForJesus
I think I would be filing charges against the roommates. Trespass, illegal search, vandalism, everything I could think of to hit them with.
This post was edited on 12/1/18 at 3:28 am
Posted on 12/1/18 at 4:15 am to SlapahoeTribe
quote:This paragraph serves as a perfect illustration of a poor understanding of the Second Amendment.
Now, will the city/state protect this girl’s constitutional rights and fight the discrimination against her the same way they protect against the discrimination against other groups??? I have my doubts.
The Constitution says that the GOVERNMENT cannot “infringe” her right to keep and bear arms. It says NOTHING about preventing a private property owner from prohibiting the possession of weapons on his land.
Posted on 12/1/18 at 4:18 am to greygoose
quote:You clearly have ZERO understanding of the Constitution.
No lease can strip you of your CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS!
Imagine if the lease said, "No Christianity practiced". Same thing!
The Bill of Rights prevents GOVERNMENTAL action.
Posted on 12/1/18 at 4:24 am to SlapahoeTribe
quote:”Does” it or “should” it?
Question: Does a bakery have the right to control who they provide services to?
“Does it?” In many cases, no, because of various public accommodation laws. There is certainly a valid discussion to be had regarding the Constitutional VALIDITY of such laws under the Commerce Clause, but the current state of Commerce Clause jurisprudence makes that discussion rather moot.
“Should it?” Yes. As I have said more than 100 times (including at least twice yesterday), I oppose public accommodation laws as an infringement upon the rights of a business owner. My only caveot is that any business which refuses to serve any individual or group should be required to post/publish that information beforehand, so that the market has an opportunity to factor that discrimination into the decision-making process.
This post was edited on 12/1/18 at 4:41 am
Posted on 12/1/18 at 6:43 am to AggieHank86
"Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious People."
That is to say a people who instinticvely understand that self defense is good, guns are good, snooping through your roommates stuff is bad, and 'gay marriage'isn't a thing.
Without trying to unwrap legal/intellectual pretzels to get there.
That is to say a people who instinticvely understand that self defense is good, guns are good, snooping through your roommates stuff is bad, and 'gay marriage'isn't a thing.
Without trying to unwrap legal/intellectual pretzels to get there.
This post was edited on 12/1/18 at 6:45 am
Posted on 12/1/18 at 6:52 am to Zach
quote:
Tell Dr. Zach about how you felt. Let's start with your mother. Did she point a gun at you when you were a baby?
No, but my roommate did when he got drunk once. I don't think it should be illegal for this to happen and certainly I agree with the second amendment. My comment was more in terms of common decency if you're sharing a communal space and bringing weapons. I.E. if I was married and owned guns, I would make sure my wife knew where they were and what condition they were stored in.
You guys were on a hair pin trigger about this yesterday
Posted on 12/1/18 at 7:03 am to greygoose
quote:
bullshite!!
No lease can strip you of your CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS!
Imagine if the lease said, "No Christianity practiced". Same thing!
Um, no. A no Christianity clause would violate the Fair Housing Act.
The landlord has property rights and can ban guns if that's what he wants. He cannot ban tenants based on a protected characteristic such as religion.
Posted on 12/1/18 at 7:18 am to AggieHank86
quote:
"Small govt conservatives” bitch about landlord exercising his private property rights.
No one here is bitching about the landlord exercising his private property rights. We're pointing out the absurdity of nut job liberals having their roommate kicked out over a pistol she legally owns.
Posted on 12/1/18 at 7:51 am to Bestbank Tiger
quote:
Um, no. A no Christianity clause would violate the Fair Housing Act.
The landlord has property rights and can ban guns if that's what he wants. He cannot ban tenants based on a protected characteristic such as religion.
This is what I get for drunk posting. Apologies.
Posted on 12/1/18 at 9:11 am to Music_City_Tiger
It appears that the young lady has a bunch of SJW roommates who like to snoop through others' stuff and raise hell if they find anything they disagree with. I hope she files charges and sues both them and the landlord.
frick a bunch of dumbass SJWs. Hold them accountable.
MAGA
frick a bunch of dumbass SJWs. Hold them accountable.
MAGA
Posted on 12/1/18 at 9:14 am to AggieHank86
quote:
”Small govt conservatives” bitch about landlord exercising his private property rights.
Did the rent agreement state that no guns were allowed on his property?
Posted on 12/1/18 at 9:25 am to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
No one here is bitching about the landlord exercising his private property rights. We're pointing out the absurdity of nut job liberals having their roommate kicked out over a pistol she legally owns.
Bet those nut job liberals would’ve thanked her had she shot an intruder
Posted on 12/1/18 at 10:04 am to AggieHank86
quote:
It says NOTHING about preventing a private property owner from prohibiting the possession of weapons on his land.
Except the courts have already decided that landlords' private propery rights are subject to modification. You are a perfect illustration of the ignorance of case law involving this issue.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News