- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kentucky only SEC state not supporting TX. The battle lines have been drawn.
Posted on 1/26/24 at 8:46 am to Covingtontiger77
Posted on 1/26/24 at 8:46 am to Covingtontiger77
Missouri took longest, because they love to be slow and be last.
0
Posted on 1/26/24 at 8:48 am to jrobic4
quote:
But, but, but..."moderate", Pro2A, etc....push come to shove, the DEMS ALWAYS FALL IN LINE
Would Edwards have sided with Texas if he was still Gov of Louisiana?
Posted on 1/26/24 at 8:49 am to Covingtontiger77
Beshear is going to toe the line. No surprise here.
Posted on 1/26/24 at 8:51 am to Covingtontiger77
Every governor of those states needs to flood that border with their national guard and state personnel if they have not done so already.
Posted on 1/26/24 at 8:52 am to Covingtontiger77
I see KY as the opposite. Completely surrounded and easily over taken.
They may start out on the wrong side but they will be the first to fall.
North Caroline is next to fall.
The people of Kansas will rise up against the urban centers and most of the territory of the state will be friendly.
When the non-red states start starving it will be over. “We” control most of the food production.
They may start out on the wrong side but they will be the first to fall.
North Caroline is next to fall.
The people of Kansas will rise up against the urban centers and most of the territory of the state will be friendly.
When the non-red states start starving it will be over. “We” control most of the food production.
Posted on 1/26/24 at 8:58 am to Covingtontiger77
5 more states and we can get an Article V Convention going to amend the constitution to create a damn strong immigration law and stop all this frickery.
Posted on 1/26/24 at 9:01 am to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:
“We” control most of the food production.
Actually, California does along with some Midwest states. That's not to say the South couldn't in a time of war. Point is, in your fictional scenario, both sides have the means to produce.
Posted on 1/26/24 at 9:08 am to Covingtontiger77
This map is literally from the coalition of "republican" governors. If your state has a dem governor, you wont be on the map in red regardless if your state us supporting texas or not. Same is true for Kansas.
Posted on 1/26/24 at 9:10 am to teke184
quote:
KY still has a Dem governor. He isn’t going to buck the White House.
Or cocaine Mitch.
Posted on 1/26/24 at 9:17 am to Trauma14
quote:
Actually, California does along with some Midwest states.
California, Illinois, and the other states on their side don’t stack up to the states colored red. Not even close.
If this were to break as mapped the majority of the food production is colored red.
Posted on 1/26/24 at 9:19 am to LSUSlidell23
quote:
Colorado is becoming the state i despise when it comes to politics.
It's all due to Denver and Boulder.
Posted on 1/26/24 at 9:36 am to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:
California, Illinois, and the other states on their side don’t stack up to the states colored red. Not even close. If this were to break as mapped the majority of the food production is colored red.
There’s probably not a scenario where you get to starve millions and not also get droned into oblivion. That would be a horrible scenario if it gets to that
Posted on 1/26/24 at 9:44 am to MAADFACTS
quote:
There’s probably not a scenario where you get to starve millions and not also get droned into oblivion. That would be a horrible scenario if it gets to that
Do you think we were sending Germany food during WWII?
Was the north sending food south during the war of northern aggression?
Did the British feed Americans during the revolutionary war?
If this hypothetical war breaks out trade between the sides is not going to be happening.
Posted on 1/26/24 at 9:48 am to Covingtontiger77
quote:
Hopefully KY and NC can be conquered.
Posted on 1/26/24 at 9:51 am to Covingtontiger77
quote:
NC can be flipped
Its really NC and Alaska that are boxed out, everyone else has access to each other through a friendly state.
Oh and NH.
This post was edited on 1/26/24 at 9:53 am
Posted on 1/26/24 at 10:33 am to Covingtontiger77
Flip Arizona, then you cut off NM, CO, and KS. They’d be so screwed.
This would also isolate CA, OR, and WA 2,000 miles from their allies. I’d imagine they’d go through Canada from WA to Somalia, I mean MN..
Posted on 1/26/24 at 10:34 am to Covingtontiger77
Kentucky cucked themselves and didn’t join the confederacy either
Posted on 1/26/24 at 10:52 am to Mid Iowa Tiger
Oh yeah, I agree that this would happen in a war. Where we disagree is that I think it’s a bad outcome
Posted on 1/26/24 at 11:15 am to Covingtontiger77
Barge right on through Kentucky. They ain't gonna' do shite. And if they think they are, let them try to bring it.
Posted on 1/26/24 at 11:17 am to LSUSlidell23
quote:
Colorado is becoming the state i despise when it comes to politics.
Don't sleep on Wisconsin.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News