- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judges are trying to become president.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:01 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:01 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
There's not a logical relationship between that case and this one
Stop slide your way out of this. You agree that not everyone deserves their day in court. It doesn’t matter what the relationship between the cases are or are not.
Do you or do you not agree that everyone, both US citizens and not, deserves their day in court?
1
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:02 am to BigJim
quote:
So when a leftist gets in and says "Global warming (or insert other liberal cause) is a existential problem and we have to act quickly. We don't have time to follow a slow and plodding judiciary system,"
If the whole of the people uniformly believe in the existential threat, they won't.
The key is, is the threat real or not?
But if enough people believe that it is real, that won't matter either.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:02 am to 1897
I like some of his domestic policies but he’s too dishonest to go unchecked. I don’t know of a more dishonest person. It’s comical watching you guys gobble down every shameless lie he tells.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:03 am to AggieHank86
quote:
the failure of the Trump administration to follow those procedures.
Did y’all ’follow the procedure’ to let 15 million random foreigners through the south gate? It was a treasonous act y’all said wasn’t even happening. Courts, courts, courts…yea right.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:04 am to Flats
quote:statutequote:Appropriate as determined by.....?
appropriate procedures
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:04 am to eddieray
quote:
I like some of his domestic policies but he’s too dishonest to go unchecked.
Everyone is too dishonest to go unchecked.
Judges included.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:05 am to AggieHank86
quote:
statute
Statutes don't bang a gavel. A person decides whether or not they're following "appropriate" procedure.
If you don't know just say so.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:06 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
bullshite. TDA is a declared terrorist organization. Its the clear letter of the law.
The declaration may be outside the clear loader of the law, and the people ensnared in the designation may not fit the statutory authority granted to the president by Congress.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:07 am to Gaston
quote:Who is this “y’all?”
Did y’all ’follow the procedure’ to let 15 million random foreigners through the south gate?
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:07 am to GumboPot
oh and frick this POS judge saying he cannot ban trannys from military. where was this bitch last time trump banned them?
f all these judges. ignore them.
f all these judges. ignore them.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:08 am to Flats
Trump needs to take away the security clearances of the judges. Then anything related to national security that they demand can be rejected.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:08 am to GumboPot
It's the Democraps last ploy, they couldn't figure out how to stop Trump so this is their new plan.
They tried jail, tying him up in court, bankruptcy, humiliation, murder and a fake news propaganda smear.
These people hate America
They tried jail, tying him up in court, bankruptcy, humiliation, murder and a fake news propaganda smear.
These people hate America
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:08 am to Fat Bastard
quote:
f all these judges. ignore them.
So this is how liberty dies, with thunderous applause.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:09 am to SlowFlowPro
So what statutes did Trump violate by deporting illegal aliens?
If your President hadn’t ignored the law for four years in the first place, we wouldn’t have the problems with the illegals in the first place.
So only Trump has to follow every detail of the law, but Dems can do whatever the hell they want because that’s (D)ifferent. This is what got Trump elected. If you can’t admit that, then you’re part of the problem.
If your President hadn’t ignored the law for four years in the first place, we wouldn’t have the problems with the illegals in the first place.
So only Trump has to follow every detail of the law, but Dems can do whatever the hell they want because that’s (D)ifferent. This is what got Trump elected. If you can’t admit that, then you’re part of the problem.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:11 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:again, the point to which I was responding was an allegation of “judicial silence“ about that event
I admit that I am not familiar with the lawsuit addressing this issue. Convenient. Obama literally kills a US citizen on foreign soil. Why? Because he's a terrorist.
I am not familiar with a lawsuit which would have given any opportunity for “judicial statements.“
If you’re familiar with such a lawsuit, please let us know.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:15 am to pankReb
quote:
Stop slide your way out of this.
I'm not. The 2 cases aren't comparable.
The Obama case was dismissed for standing and justiciability. Standing is an irrelevant point to this Trump matter, as the parties clearly have standing (being physically present in the US and still being alive). The Justiciability issue is the one being debated in the Trump matter, when there was an actual, clear military operation going on in the Obama matter. So, again, nothing alike.
quote:
Do you or do you not agree that everyone, both US citizens and not, deserves their day in court?
My personal opinion is that everyone does deserve their day in court and these laws are authoritarian.
The legal analysis is whether or not the law removing DP applies to this situation. That's one of the main issues being analyzed by the judges.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:16 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Maybe it is not a "Radical Left Lunatic Judge" acting alone, but rather a duly, Constitutionally appointed and confirmed federal judge, enforcing statutes enacted by the American people acting through their elected representatives in Congress. Just a thought.
An absolutely ridiculous and indefensible thought, but yeah a thought.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:17 am to Catahoula20LSU
quote:The question is if his invocation of the 2 laws relied upon was legal/proper.
So what statutes did Trump violate by deporting illegal aliens?
Nobody disputes that he could have deported most, if not all, of these people via normal deportation proceedings. The Trump admin chose a different, much more theoretical and aggressive (legally) path.
quote:
If your President hadn’t ignored the law for four years in the first place, we wouldn’t have the problems with the illegals in the first place.
Biden isn't my President, and this is an irrelevant point to the legal discussion.
quote:
So only Trump has to follow every detail of the law, but Dems can do whatever the hell they want
No. Biden was rebuked by the courts multiple times and I agreed with the courts in pretty much every one (if not every one).
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:18 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The Obama case was dismissed for standing and justiciability.
That's what happened.
People are really discussing why that happened, and I suspect you know this.
You and Hank keep trying to paint this as if the decisions are objective made and politically untainted, and nobody believes that any more.
This post was edited on 3/19/25 at 9:19 am
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:19 am to AggieHank86
Maybe it’s some of both but ignoring the resistance they always clearly say they will do seems silly.
Obama and Biden pushed through some radical leftists. There’s no denying that.
Obama and Biden pushed through some radical leftists. There’s no denying that.
Page 8 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News