- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge calls rare hearing on a holiday in case against Musk's DOGE
Posted on 2/17/25 at 11:13 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Posted on 2/17/25 at 11:13 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
If SCOTUS doesn’t step in before too long, they will force Trump to defy some of these orders. Other option would be to acquiesce and cede all Executive power to the Judicial branch.
3
Posted on 2/17/25 at 11:15 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:She suddenly cares what Trump does in his "day job"?
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, I wonder how she will rule?
Posted on 2/17/25 at 11:18 am to Lsuhoohoo
good find.
Posted on 2/17/25 at 11:28 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
To be fair, when DOGE was pitched in the pre-election rallies, I was under the impression that DOGE was basically an auditing department that would recommend/advise Trump & his cabinet on what agencies/programs/organizations/leaders to cut/defund/fire. I didn't know DOGE would be given power to do the defunding & firing.
Simple resolution: let Elon tell an "elected" official or confirmed cabinet member who to fire & what to defund. It takes an extra step by having to relay the info, but it avoids frivolous activist judge delays.
Simple resolution: let Elon tell an "elected" official or confirmed cabinet member who to fire & what to defund. It takes an extra step by having to relay the info, but it avoids frivolous activist judge delays.
Posted on 2/17/25 at 11:33 am to Clockwatcher68
quote:
they will force Trump to defy some of these orders
this is the gameplan
then theyll sell the outrage as him being a dictator, and use it to run up a billion dollar midterm fundraising grift.
rinse, repeat.
Posted on 2/17/25 at 11:34 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
No standing
Posted on 2/17/25 at 11:42 am to LSUFreek
Is DOGE actually doing the defunding and the firing?
Posted on 2/17/25 at 11:45 am to Clockwatcher68
quote:
If SCOTUS doesn’t step in before too long, they will force Trump to defy some of these orders. Other option would be to acquiesce and cede all Executive power to the Judicial branch.
The left wants to force him to ignore the rulings to kickoff the constitutional crisis/impeachment process.
Posted on 2/17/25 at 11:45 am to JimEverett
No, doge is making the recommendations. They have no authority to fire or defund. That’s is Trump’s prerogative
Posted on 2/17/25 at 12:09 pm to tide06
quote:This use absolutely the play and there are enough rinos afraid of what Musk is finding to impeach in the house. They will not allow fedgov to be reigned in make no mistake. Clip and save this post
The left wants to force him to ignore the rulings to kickoff the constitutional crisis/impeachment process.
Posted on 2/17/25 at 12:09 pm to CrotchetyCowboy
Is the court going to address why a state has authority over a decision made in the executive branch under the constitutional authority of the executive branch
Posted on 2/17/25 at 12:50 pm to dafif
quote:because cheeto. The same reasoning used for every twisted judicial decision handed down by leftists whacko judges for the past 4-5 years
Is the court going to address why a state has authority over a decision made in the executive branch under the constitutional authority of the executive branch
Posted on 2/17/25 at 12:51 pm to Clockwatcher68
quote:
If SCOTUS doesn’t step in before too long, they will force Trump to defy some of these orders. Other option would be to acquiesce and cede all Executive power to the Judicial branch.
They will just continuous file suits, wait for it to get to the SC and rinse and repeat for the next four years if the Supreme court does not come forward with a clear ruling to stop this nonsense.
Otherwise the SC has no standing because a federal judge in DC is deciding law for the US.
Posted on 2/17/25 at 12:53 pm to JimEverett
quote:
Is DOGE actually doing the defunding and the firing?
No but the msm is reporting it repeatedly and the public believes it.
Posted on 2/17/25 at 12:55 pm to LSUFreek
quote:
I didn't know DOGE would be given power to do the defunding & firing.
They're not.
Unless I've missed a massive development somewhere.
Posted on 2/17/25 at 1:04 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Another one deserving of impeachment.
Posted on 2/17/25 at 1:17 pm to Auburn1968
Must say I’m surprised considering the judge. Let libtard reeeeeeing commence:
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 2/17/25 at 1:36 pm to HoopsAurora
They're trying to argue he's violating the appointments clause. He's not because they geniusly renamed the U.S. Digital Services to DOGE. Obama started USDS via executive order because of the shite show that was healthcare.gov (obamacare website). It's funding has since been appropriated by congress, giving it legitimate staying power.
The head of the U.S. Digital Service (USDS) does not have to be confirmed by the Senate. The USDS operates within the Executive Office of the President and as such, its leadership appointments do not require Senate confirmation.
Here's the U.S. Digital Services original intent (sounds DOGEy to me):
The head of the U.S. Digital Service (USDS) does not have to be confirmed by the Senate. The USDS operates within the Executive Office of the President and as such, its leadership appointments do not require Senate confirmation.
Here's the U.S. Digital Services original intent (sounds DOGEy to me):
quote:
1. Enhance User Experience: USDS aimed to transform government websites, applications, and services to be as intuitive and seamless as leading private sector digital products. This included simplifying processes for citizens to interact with government services, like filing taxes or applying for benefits.
2. Increase Efficiency: By applying technology and design thinking, USDS sought to reduce the cost and complexity of government operations, making them more efficient. This involved modernizing outdated IT systems and improving data management practices.
3. Drive Innovation: The service was meant to foster innovation within government by bringing in tech talent from Silicon Valley and other tech hubs, thereby importing cutting-edge technology practices into the public sector.
4. Solve Complex Problems: USDS was tasked with tackling some of the government's most pressing digital challenges, such as cybersecurity, data breaches, and the modernization of critical systems like healthcare.gov.
5. Improve Government Transparency and Accountability: By enhancing the digital infrastructure, USDS aimed to make government more transparent, allowing for better tracking of how services are delivered and how taxpayer money is spent.
6. Cultural Change in Government: There was an intent to change the culture within government agencies, encouraging a mindset shift towards agility, collaboration, and a user-first approach in technology development.
This post was edited on 2/17/25 at 1:39 pm
Posted on 2/17/25 at 1:39 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
The in-your-face political bias and corruption in the one place that is supposed to be free of it (our “justice” system) is frankly infuriating. I hope we see some judicial impeachments this year.
Posted on 2/17/25 at 1:43 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Do we not have a ruling in Trump’s favor regarding this (similar suits)
Even if they get their ruling, it should be ignored and the favorable ruling should be followed until SCOTUS weighs in
Even if they get their ruling, it should be ignored and the favorable ruling should be followed until SCOTUS weighs in
This post was edited on 2/17/25 at 4:20 pm
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News