Started By
Message

Jeff Landry wants his office exempt from Public Record Law

Posted on 2/26/24 at 12:18 pm
Posted by whoa
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2017
4562 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 12:18 pm
LINK

Thoughts?
Posted by LoneStar23
USA
Member since Aug 2019
5151 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 12:19 pm to
No public servant should be exempt period. Republican or Democrat
Posted by dakarx
Member since Sep 2018
6824 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 12:21 pm to
Wanting to hide things from public view is NEVER a good look for a public official.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
139816 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 12:22 pm to
Without reading, this is probably about records related to security of the gov and his family. Florida did the same thing and commies and another particular group melted down.

ETA: yep
This post was edited on 2/26/24 at 12:25 pm
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
52765 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

Thoughts?


Yeah, you provided a link to nothing. Where is the bill?

ETA: Found it
This post was edited on 2/26/24 at 12:52 pm
Posted by Lawyered
The Sip
Member since Oct 2016
29247 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 12:23 pm to
Full transparency or GTFO . Period.

Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
94915 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 12:24 pm to
Should not be exempt, but there is a history of abuses of this law by the opposition just to drown someone in paperwork.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101321 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

quote:
Thoughts?


Yeah, you provided a link to nothing. Where is the bill?



Yeah, that seemed rather odd.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
139816 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 12:25 pm to
Click on the botton that says text. I’ll link in a minute.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
52765 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

Click on the botton that says text. I’ll link in a minute.


Found it thanks. So, of course, the OP can't read his own topic.

quote:

A. This Chapter shall not apply to any records having been used, being in 19 use, possessed, or retained for use by the governor in the usual course of the duties 20 and business of his office relating to the deliberative process of the governor, 21 intra-office communications of the governor and his internal staff, the governor's 22 security and schedule, or communications with or the security and schedule of the 23 governor's spouse or children.


quote:

B.(1) Except as otherwise provided in this Subsection, the provisions of this 25 Section shall not apply to any agency, office, or department transferred or placed 26 within the office of the governor.


quote:

C. The provisions of Subsection B of this Section shall not prevent any 4 person from inspecting, examining, copying, or obtaining an electronic or physical 5 reproduction of any record pertaining to any money or monies, any assets or items 6 of economic value to the state, or any financial transactions in the control of or 7 handled by or through the governor or the office of the governor.


This post was edited on 2/26/24 at 12:31 pm
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
52765 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

whoa


Since you blatantly lied in the thread subject, care to man up and change the title?
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
139816 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 12:30 pm to
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51489 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

Yeah, you provided a link to nothing. Where is the bill?


LINK

quote:

Abstract: Exempts from the Public Records Law the records of the office of the governor relating to the deliberative process of the governor, intra-office communications of the governor and his internal staff, the governor's security and schedule, or communications with or the security and schedule of the governor's spouse or children.

Present law provides that the records of the office of the governor are public records. Provides that a record of the office of the governor relating to intra-office communications of the governor and his internal staff, except those relative to fiscal matters, may be privileged from disclosure. Provides that any record pertaining to the schedule of the governor or that of his spouse or child containing security details may be held confidential for a period not to exceed seven days following the scheduled event. Defines "office of the governor" as the governor, chief of staff, deputy chief of staff, and executive counsel.

Present law requires the governor and his internal staff to preserve all records of the office of the governor, and at the conclusion of his term of office, requires the governor to transfer all such records to the custody of the archives division of the secretary of state.

Present law further provides that any exemption granted by present law lapses eight years after the creation of the record and provides that after the lapse of eight years, the records of the office of the governor are public record.

Proposed law removes the provisions of present law and provides instead that the laws relative to public records shall not apply to records having been used, being in use, possessed, or retained for use by the governor in the usual course of the duties and business of his office relating to the deliberative process of the governor, intra-office communications of the governor and his internal staff, the governor's security and schedule, or communications with or the security and schedule of the governor's spouse or children. Provides definitions for "deliberative process", "relating to the deliberative process of the governor", and "internal staff of the governor".

Proposed law specifies that the exemption does not apply to agencies transferred or placed within the office of the governor; however, provides that a record that is limited to predecisional advice and recommendations to the governor concerning budgeting and that is in the custody of any agency or department headed by an unclassified gubernatorial appointee shall be privileged for six months from the date the record is prepared.

Present law provides that no person shall be prevented from inspecting or obtaining an electronic or physical reproduction of record pertaining to any money or monies, any assets or items of economic value to the state, or any financial transactions in the control of or handled by or through the governor or the office of the governor. Proposed law retains present law.



EDIT: Went with the abstact since others had posted the changes. Tried to make it as readable as possible.
This post was edited on 2/26/24 at 12:41 pm
Posted by TROLA
BATON ROUGE
Member since Apr 2004
12299 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 12:35 pm to
In very limited instances I’m for allowable exemptions that sunset quickly.
Eg; negotiations with certain parties sometimes require limited disclosure in the immediacy but never forever.
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
23663 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

This Chapter shall not apply to any records having been used, being in 19 use, possessed, or retained for use by the governor in the usual course of the duties 20 and business of his office relating to the deliberative process of the governor, 21 intra-office communications of the governor and his internal staff

That part is trouble. Should not be allowed to become law.
Posted by Damone
FoCo
Member since Aug 2016
32585 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 12:37 pm to
This dude just keeps getting better and better
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
139816 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 12:38 pm to
I believe there is a six month window.


Company A is negotiating with the LA gov about relo package.

Reporter FOiA and leaks those details.

AZ get that info and revamps their relo package using LA good faith against them.
Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
10263 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 12:38 pm to
Who the phuck cares about a hood look or not . The only reason to hide information is for criminal activity, that’s it
Posted by White Bear
Yonnygo
Member since Jul 2014
13808 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 12:38 pm to
Jeff Landry is a conservative. He told me so.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
139816 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 12:41 pm to
Is hiding details of your negotiations with corporations for 6 months criminal?

Is it criminal to hide security details about upcoming events?

Leftists were digging for this info in FL too in order to threaten Desantis.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram