Started By
Message

re: Is it wrong to expect thots to cover themselves around children?

Posted on 9/9/21 at 9:23 am to
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
60729 posts
Posted on 9/9/21 at 9:23 am to
So he is mad about bikinis at a place where bikinis are worn.


Later he ranted on the gritty nature of sand in his toes and the wetness from the water.
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
27006 posts
Posted on 9/9/21 at 9:36 am to
quote:

There is nothing wrong with any of those bikinis. Correct time and place.


Agreed, what's next? Religious fundamentalists saying no bare feet or sandals at the beach because a segment of our population has a foot fetish?

That's the logic being presented in this thread taken to its logical conclusion. Theres a reason burqas exist...
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
45835 posts
Posted on 9/9/21 at 9:40 am to
quote:

Yes from the dreaded bikini. How will society carry on if we can see beyond a woman's bare ankle....oh the humanity.


If Christians are to be consistent, we are to be consistent with the small things as well as the big things. Also, considering lust is a huge problem in society, having people walking around in attire that is sure to bring about lust in a lot of people is something Christians should be concerned about.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
26944 posts
Posted on 9/9/21 at 10:03 am to
quote:

Agreed, what's next? Religious fundamentalists saying no bare feet or sandals at the beach because a segment of our population has a foot fetish?


Given our current trajectory it's much more likely that secular fundamentalists will be calling people religious fundamentalists because they object to an orgy on a public beach.

I say that as someone who thinks this guy's objections are silly, but let's be honest about the direction we're headed.
Posted by AlterEgo89
Member since Sep 2021
135 posts
Posted on 9/9/21 at 10:08 am to
quote:


There is nothing wrong with any of those bikinis. Correct time and place.



I mean you would say that as a woman yourself. You guys have been objectifying yourselves for longer than I've been alive. I'm not complaining because I enjoy looking at women who dress in revealing clothing. However, women can't turn around and complain that they're sexualized.

The bikini is still an item of clothing that is heavily sexualized. The one piece isn't sexualized - by wearing a bikini, you're agreeing to be sexualized. Women can turn around and say it's not a sexual piece of clothing but that doesn't change reality.

My 55-year-old mom doesn't dress in a bikini now, does she?

This post was edited on 9/9/21 at 10:10 am
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
27006 posts
Posted on 9/9/21 at 10:09 am to
quote:

Given our current trajectory it's much more likely that secular fundamentalists will be calling people religious fundamentalists because they object to an orgy on a public beach.


Probably, still doesn't make fundamentalists right about bikinis at the beach tho
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
27006 posts
Posted on 9/9/21 at 10:10 am to
quote:

The one piece isn't sexualized...


*Insert gallery of bay watch slomo gifs*
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
133512 posts
Posted on 9/9/21 at 10:11 am to



That’s a legit graphic.

Too bad those hard Christmas candies are gross and no one wants to eat them
This post was edited on 9/9/21 at 10:12 am
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
26944 posts
Posted on 9/9/21 at 10:13 am to
quote:

However, women can't turn around and complain that they're sexualized.



You want logic and consistency from females?
Posted by Lg
Hayden, Alabama
Member since Jul 2011
8528 posts
Posted on 9/9/21 at 10:20 am to
quote:

Owning people Is wrong period.


This is grand. We are all slaves.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
69343 posts
Posted on 9/9/21 at 10:21 am to
You might have a valid argument at church, a k-12 school, or a family casual dining restaurant, but not at the beach.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
10646 posts
Posted on 9/9/21 at 10:21 am to
quote:

Turns out we have a more refined moral compass than s bunch of desert tribes from old days


No, you have a different one that in your opinion is better because it's supposedly more refined.

I personally think that killing 55 million human beings in utero mostly for convenience since 1973 is as barbaric as anything that happened back then.

But without some objective standard of morality, all either one of us has is his opinion on that.

Absolutely nothing except that can possibly make today's standards of morality "better" or "worse." I noticed that you attempted to avoid that obvious conclusion by using the words "more refined," but the implication is obviously that if it's more refined, it's better.

This is not necessarily true at all. It could be more refined to a reductionist post-modern level (and in fact it has been), and it's just a matter of opinion without some objective standard whether it's better or not.

This post was edited on 9/9/21 at 10:26 am
Posted by Placekicker
Florida
Member since Jan 2016
12362 posts
Posted on 9/9/21 at 10:22 am to
7,2,5,6,1,4,3
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
27006 posts
Posted on 9/9/21 at 10:28 am to
quote:

wackatimesthree


By any chance, did the source you think establishes objective morality drown every child on earth back in the day?

I do agree with you on abortion, though.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
26944 posts
Posted on 9/9/21 at 10:29 am to
quote:

No, you have a different one that in your opinion is better because it's supposedly more refined.


I don't think the hog is ready for that discussion.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
10646 posts
Posted on 9/9/21 at 10:30 am to
quote:

By any chance, did the source you think establishes objective morality drown every child on earth back in the day?


I didn't say anything about believing that any objective source of morality exists, much less point to a specific one.

All I did was point out the reality of the situation if there isn't one.
This post was edited on 9/9/21 at 10:31 am
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
45835 posts
Posted on 9/9/21 at 10:30 am to
quote:

By any chance, did the source you think establishes objective morality drown every child on earth back in the day?

Emotional plea incoming...

quote:

I do agree with you on abortion, though.
So what? You have a personal distaste for abortion. That doesn't make it immoral. That just means you don't like it.
This post was edited on 9/9/21 at 10:31 am
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
27006 posts
Posted on 9/9/21 at 11:30 am to
quote:

Emotional plea incoming...


Pointing out inconsistencies isn't an emotional plea.

quote:

So what? You have a personal distaste for abortion. That doesn't make it immoral. That just means you don't like it.


IDGAF how you label it, peoples feelings about various issues influence policy and set law. If everyone "didn't like abortion" it wouldn't be legal. If 90% of the population "didn't like abortion" it wouldn't be legal. I'm just voicing where I stand.
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
27006 posts
Posted on 9/9/21 at 11:35 am to


Ms. Foo having a women's retreat in Florida.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135699 posts
Posted on 9/9/21 at 11:39 am to
quote:

Emotional plea incoming...
What did Eve wear?
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram