- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is it wrong to expect thots to cover themselves around children?
Posted on 9/9/21 at 9:23 am to Seldom Seen
Posted on 9/9/21 at 9:23 am to Seldom Seen
So he is mad about bikinis at a place where bikinis are worn.
Later he ranted on the gritty nature of sand in his toes and the wetness from the water.
Later he ranted on the gritty nature of sand in his toes and the wetness from the water.
Posted on 9/9/21 at 9:36 am to LSUGrrrl
quote:
There is nothing wrong with any of those bikinis. Correct time and place.
Agreed, what's next? Religious fundamentalists saying no bare feet or sandals at the beach because a segment of our population has a foot fetish?
That's the logic being presented in this thread taken to its logical conclusion. Theres a reason burqas exist...
Posted on 9/9/21 at 9:40 am to oklahogjr
quote:
Yes from the dreaded bikini. How will society carry on if we can see beyond a woman's bare ankle....oh the humanity.
If Christians are to be consistent, we are to be consistent with the small things as well as the big things. Also, considering lust is a huge problem in society, having people walking around in attire that is sure to bring about lust in a lot of people is something Christians should be concerned about.
Posted on 9/9/21 at 10:03 am to Azkiger
quote:
Agreed, what's next? Religious fundamentalists saying no bare feet or sandals at the beach because a segment of our population has a foot fetish?
Given our current trajectory it's much more likely that secular fundamentalists will be calling people religious fundamentalists because they object to an orgy on a public beach.
I say that as someone who thinks this guy's objections are silly, but let's be honest about the direction we're headed.
Posted on 9/9/21 at 10:08 am to LSUGrrrl
quote:
There is nothing wrong with any of those bikinis. Correct time and place.
I mean you would say that as a woman yourself. You guys have been objectifying yourselves for longer than I've been alive. I'm not complaining because I enjoy looking at women who dress in revealing clothing. However, women can't turn around and complain that they're sexualized.
The bikini is still an item of clothing that is heavily sexualized. The one piece isn't sexualized - by wearing a bikini, you're agreeing to be sexualized. Women can turn around and say it's not a sexual piece of clothing but that doesn't change reality.
My 55-year-old mom doesn't dress in a bikini now, does she?
This post was edited on 9/9/21 at 10:10 am
Posted on 9/9/21 at 10:09 am to Flats
quote:
Given our current trajectory it's much more likely that secular fundamentalists will be calling people religious fundamentalists because they object to an orgy on a public beach.
Probably, still doesn't make fundamentalists right about bikinis at the beach tho
Posted on 9/9/21 at 10:10 am to AlterEgo89
quote:
The one piece isn't sexualized...
*Insert gallery of bay watch slomo gifs*
Posted on 9/9/21 at 10:11 am to TrueTiger
That’s a legit graphic.
Too bad those hard Christmas candies are gross and no one wants to eat them
This post was edited on 9/9/21 at 10:12 am
Posted on 9/9/21 at 10:13 am to AlterEgo89
quote:
However, women can't turn around and complain that they're sexualized.
You want logic and consistency from females?
Posted on 9/9/21 at 10:20 am to oklahogjr
quote:
Owning people Is wrong period.
This is grand. We are all slaves.
Posted on 9/9/21 at 10:21 am to Seldom Seen
You might have a valid argument at church, a k-12 school, or a family casual dining restaurant, but not at the beach.
Posted on 9/9/21 at 10:21 am to oklahogjr
quote:
Turns out we have a more refined moral compass than s bunch of desert tribes from old days
No, you have a different one that in your opinion is better because it's supposedly more refined.
I personally think that killing 55 million human beings in utero mostly for convenience since 1973 is as barbaric as anything that happened back then.
But without some objective standard of morality, all either one of us has is his opinion on that.
Absolutely nothing except that can possibly make today's standards of morality "better" or "worse." I noticed that you attempted to avoid that obvious conclusion by using the words "more refined," but the implication is obviously that if it's more refined, it's better.
This is not necessarily true at all. It could be more refined to a reductionist post-modern level (and in fact it has been), and it's just a matter of opinion without some objective standard whether it's better or not.
This post was edited on 9/9/21 at 10:26 am
Posted on 9/9/21 at 10:28 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
wackatimesthree
By any chance, did the source you think establishes objective morality drown every child on earth back in the day?
I do agree with you on abortion, though.
Posted on 9/9/21 at 10:29 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
No, you have a different one that in your opinion is better because it's supposedly more refined.
I don't think the hog is ready for that discussion.
Posted on 9/9/21 at 10:30 am to Azkiger
quote:
By any chance, did the source you think establishes objective morality drown every child on earth back in the day?
I didn't say anything about believing that any objective source of morality exists, much less point to a specific one.
All I did was point out the reality of the situation if there isn't one.
This post was edited on 9/9/21 at 10:31 am
Posted on 9/9/21 at 10:30 am to Azkiger
quote:Emotional plea incoming...
By any chance, did the source you think establishes objective morality drown every child on earth back in the day?
quote:So what? You have a personal distaste for abortion. That doesn't make it immoral. That just means you don't like it.
I do agree with you on abortion, though.
This post was edited on 9/9/21 at 10:31 am
Posted on 9/9/21 at 11:30 am to FooManChoo
quote:
Emotional plea incoming...
Pointing out inconsistencies isn't an emotional plea.
quote:
So what? You have a personal distaste for abortion. That doesn't make it immoral. That just means you don't like it.
IDGAF how you label it, peoples feelings about various issues influence policy and set law. If everyone "didn't like abortion" it wouldn't be legal. If 90% of the population "didn't like abortion" it wouldn't be legal. I'm just voicing where I stand.
Posted on 9/9/21 at 11:35 am to Seldom Seen
Ms. Foo having a women's retreat in Florida.
Posted on 9/9/21 at 11:39 am to FooManChoo
quote:What did Eve wear?
Emotional plea incoming...
Popular
Back to top



0






