Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:135
Registered on:9/3/2021
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
That doesn't say what you think it does. You've shown a graph that shows the rate of deaths, not the total number of deaths.

The total number of deaths has been averaging around 350 per day this past week in Texas. In Florida, the total number of deaths per day this past week has been 326 deaths per day.

In California, the 7 day average is 132 deaths. In New York, the 7 day average is 33.

So New York < California < Florida < Texas in absolute deaths. If you take into account population size, this figure becomes even worse. Granted, Florida has a slightly older population but Texas has one of the lowest median ages in the country.

Do you get off off on spreading misinformation? Florida covid deaths are nowhere close to 0. Even as a rate, they're higher than California and New York.
quote:

Leftist bot who wants the black people out of the restaurant




Uh, as I've said, why would I want that considering I'm the same race as the guy in question? i.e. I'm Black.

You assumed my race. Wow. That's bigotry right there. :lol:
quote:

Because they just want to even though he's reading the religious exemption to them from their own poster?


What I *think* has nothing to do with what the poster says.

I think private businesses have the right to refuse service to anyone who they feel endangers the rest of their customer base.
quote:


Yep, for any reason they feel necessary. If you're gay, go someplace else. If you're Muslim, go someplace else. If you're handicapped, go someplace else. ....


Uh.. those are protected characteristics. Being gay isn't a choice nor is being handicapped. The only one that is a choice is religion (and I'm against religion being a protected characteristic for that reason).

Being vaccinated isn't a protected characteristic + it's a choice (it's also why I think refusing based on someone's religion should be allowed because religious beliefs are a choice).

The restaurant has the right to refuse the patron.

The restaurant is providing a meal you clown. I didn't say the patron was providing a service, I said the business was.
Nothing I've said is racism.

Plus, you don't know my race. If I happened to be of the same race as the gentleman in question, I don't think you could call it racism.
That's your choice.

You have the right to patronize businesses you agree with.

Businesses have the right to deny people service if they feel they're endangering the rest of their customer base and as long as they're not discriminating based on protected characteristics.
quote:

The VAT is basically a national sales tax. I don't see that passing in the U.S. any time soon, although I could get behind it if it was replacing the income tax.



Effectively, yeah.

I'm actually in favor of reducing income taxes + lowering corporate taxes + implementing a VAT. It's a much better way of raising money the government needs.

It also works so much better.

My ideal government would reduce income taxes significantly, get rid of corporate taxes, and implement a VAT. Beautiful but no government would ever do that.
There's also a shortage of ICU doctors. It's not like you can magic up doctors over night - it takes years to train them.

Staffing doesn't just mean nursing - it also means doctors as well. And that's exactly the problem - hospitals haven't got as many ICU nurses as they need right now because they've never needed that many nurses before. This is due to the pandemic.

And if nurses are off sick due to the pandemic or isolating, that just makes the problem even worse.
quote:

Hospitals stay full ALL the time


Hospitals do stay full but COVID is clearly pushing capacities to the limits.

My parents work in a local hospital and unless they're lying, they've definitely been much more full compared with previous years due to the pandemic. Hospitals are designed to operate near full but if capacity is exceeded, units can't be produced that quickly. My parents would contradict this guy (and they don't have to lie) so I'm not sure this guy is that believable by extrapolating his hospital to other hospitals around the country. This is a crisis around the world - is he seriously suggesting that hospitals around the world are all lying? Even in those countries where there is no profit motive in medicine? It's laughable.

And because hospitals are designed to stay near full, it means that capacity can't be scaled up very quickly. You've just demonstrated the problem and the exact reason there's a crisis in your comment.

And the issue isn't just capacity. It's staffing capacity. ICU units are very staff intensive - you can't just train someone overnight. It takes a long time to train people. If hospitals are designed to be near full, there wouldn't be enough staff when there are surges which is exactly the problem.
Well, you'd have to tax people making less than $400,000.

US tax brackets are much more wide than European tax brackets. I suppose some folks would want our tax system to replicate a European tax system. For example, Germany's top tax bracket kicks in at roughly $200,000 while the US top tax bracket kicks in at $400,000. Their top tax brackets are much lower so I suppose some would like our system to be like that.

Then, there's the argument to be made that the average tax payer as you mentioned makes less than $100,000. Even if higher taxes were put on those making $100,000+, it wouldn't affect the 'average tax payer.'

Or implement a VAT like in Europe. VATs are pretty efficient forms of tax and they end up raising lots of money for governments. It's also a silent tax in that people don't notice it that much.



That's how progressive taxation is meant to work.

The basic idea is that the marginal utility of money decreases as you get richer i.e. it hurts less for a rich person to be taxed more than a poor person being taxed more.

The ratio of total AGI versus share of all income tax paid doesn't seem that bad to me. It's expected from any tax system that isn't going to be flat.
Nope.

I don't wear a mask.

I'm vaccinated and the issue isn't transmission, it's hospitalization. The virus will transmit no matter what happens.

People should get vaccinated so they don't get hospitalized if they're vulnerable. That's the entire problem - vulnerable people haven't got vaccinated in the numbers they should so they overwhelm hospitals.

Not my problem any more.
I mean the reality is, you really shouldn't be needing to take Ivermectin unless you're quite vulnerable to the pandemic in the first place.

The virus is pretty much harmless to most people. There's no need to preemptively take medicine when most people don't need it.


quote:

Arthur Laffer is the preeminent economist. inventor of the Laffer Curve,


No, he isn't really that preeminent.

What do you get by spreading misinformation?

He's one economist and plenty of economists don't agree with him. There are plenty of Economists that think his theories have been discredited.

There's a reason for the common joke that you can barely get half of Economists to agree on anything.
quote:


Like the average American actually gives a flying frick when they're paying $3/gallon for gas and $7/lb for ground beef. Talk about tone deaf.



LINK

The price of crude oil is roughly what it was before the pandemic started.

The only reason the price of gas dropped during the pandemic is because demand dropped globally.

The price has now recovered to what it was pre-pandemic with higher gas prices around the world.

Not sure it has that much to do with Biden considering gas prices globally are far higher now. Demand has recovered to what it was pre-pandemic.

quote:


Since when is that the important thing? The draconian mandates are based on cases. Testing is all about cases. Everything is about cases. Hospitalizations dont mean anything in all this.


No, it's about hospitalizations. It's always been about hospitalizations. That's why the elderly and vulnerable people were vaccinated first - if it had been about cases, you'd have expected younger people to be offered the vaccine first because younger people come into contact with far more people than older people.

The mandate is because vulnerable people aren't getting vaccinated and hence are getting hospitalized.

This whole crisis is because the hospitals were being clogged up with vulnerable people.
There were only around 100,000 deaths from the virus in the UK. The UK government predicts that there are around 300,000-400,000 vulnerable people at risk of the virus. The pool is not that much smaller because the UK underwent lockdown (and those lockdowns reduced the peak from 1000 deaths to less than 100). That suggests that without lockdown, there would have been far more deaths per day which suggests the pool is still very big.

In any case, UK health experts say that vaccination has had an effect. I'm sure that if a tigerdroppings user can come up with suggestions, they've also probably considered this and ruled it out.

quote:


Or it could be that a lot more people got the virus previously so the pool is smaller now. Ever think about that, genius?



I've thought about it but it doesn't seem to make much sense.

There were only around 100,000 deaths from the virus in the UK. The UK government predicts that there are around 300,000-400,000 vulnerable people at risk of the virus. The pool is not that much smaller because the UK underwent lockdown (and those lockdowns reduced the peak from 1000 deaths to less than 100). That suggests that without lockdown, there would have been far more deaths per day which suggests the pool is still very big.

If we look at the US where certain states have had less than half their population vaccinated, death rates are still extremely high. This suggests that there is still a large pool of people vulnerable to the pandemic in the US.

The UK will be similar to the UK in that regard. It doesn't seem plausible that the pool is so significantly small that the number of deaths has reduced to a 1/10th of what it was during the previous peaks of the pandemic.

UK health experts also say that vaccination has had a significant impact. I would think they've also thought about this :lol:
quote:


Lol.


Not sure what you mean.

I have friends who are doctors over there.

Some of their hospitals were full up yet and people were being turned away (according to friends who work in the capital New Delhi's hospitals) yet the government was pretending that there was no problem. It's exactly why only 30% of the population has been vaccinated. The government tried to take it seriously but failed so they're pretending there's no crisis -> fewer people getting vaccinated.

And logically, think about it. India is a poor country where over half of people work in agriculture. If you're poor, you're not going to take a day off to get tested for a virus or even get vaccinated.
Israel hospitalizations are averaging around 1000 per day (50% lower than the previous peak), which really isn't that bad considering the number of cases is the highest it's ever been (33% higher than previous peak).

LINK

LINK

This suggests that vaccination seems to have reduced hospitalizations even in Israel.

The figures are much better for the UK. The UK is averaging around 990 hospitalizations a day (which is 3600 less than it was during the previous peak) despite the number of cases being similar to what it was under the previous peak.

So vaccination appears to have reduced hospitalizations in the UK by over 5 times.

Both Israel and the UK seem to suggest that vaccination has worked to some extent. In the UK, it seems to have worked pretty damn well (everything is open and there are only 990 hospitalizations a day compared with 4000 under the previous peak despite the number of cases being as high as the previous peak).