- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I'm still waiting for the logical reason we are at war with Iran - we know it isn't nukes
Posted on 3/24/26 at 9:49 am to theunknownknight
Posted on 3/24/26 at 9:49 am to theunknownknight
You are obviously young and naive.
It is becoming clear this war is the war we should have fought all along.
We have all discovered through this action that Iran had nuclear material they said they didn't have. We have also discovered their ballistic missile technology is much further along. I won't be surprised if we unearth more evil when these evil people are defeated.
Hopefully you will grow up one day.
It is becoming clear this war is the war we should have fought all along.
We have all discovered through this action that Iran had nuclear material they said they didn't have. We have also discovered their ballistic missile technology is much further along. I won't be surprised if we unearth more evil when these evil people are defeated.
Hopefully you will grow up one day.
Posted on 3/24/26 at 9:51 am to theunknownknight
quote:
North Korea has been directly threatening the US mainland with attacks and wiping us out since 1953.
You don't remember 2017 when TRUMP was in office? All the missile tests and direct threats wanting to “wring the windpipe of the Yankees”?
From 2022-2023 there were over 100 missile test with the intent of “striking the US mainland”
Why aren't we invading there? Especially after the turmoil in South Korea?
Team A invading Team B when both have nuclear weapons = mutually assured destruction
Team A invading Team B before Team B has a nuke = trying to prevent a mutually assured destruction scenario.
Not saying the Iran op is right or wrong, just that comparing invading a nuclear North Korea and potentially invading a not yet nuclear Iran are not the same thing logically.
This post was edited on 3/24/26 at 9:53 am
Posted on 3/24/26 at 9:51 am to theunknownknight
I think we’re fricking with China.
Like we did with Venezuela (which led to Cuba’s faltering position).
Like we did with Venezuela (which led to Cuba’s faltering position).
Posted on 3/24/26 at 9:52 am to theunknownknight
quote:
'm still waiting for the logical reason we are at war with Iran - we know it isn't nukes
You got a mouse in your pocket?
Posted on 3/24/26 at 9:55 am to geoag58
quote:
It is becoming clear this war is the war we should have fought all along.
So Trump was wrong for 45 years
Got it
Posted on 3/24/26 at 9:57 am to theunknownknight
Israel has been, piece by piece, over the past decade dismantling Iran’s proxy network. Iran built a network of allies designed to do two things: attack Israel and create enough economic leverage over the West that retaliation against/removal of the Iranian regime would be impractical.
Getting influence in Iraq gave them a land corridor to their ally in the Assad regime. This allowed them to supply Hezbollah in Southern Iran and funnel weapons into the West Bank. Meanwhile, the Houthis could harass Red Sea shipping and the Iranians could choke the Strait of Hormuz.
Iran’s influence on Iraq has waned some, the Assad regime in Syria has been overthrown, Hezbollah is a shadow of its former self after the dicksploding pager incident, the Houthis have been weakened by American and Saudi air strikes, and the Iranian regime is facing large scale resistance both from separatists in the East and from women’s rights advocates in the cities.
Israel sees Iran as vulnerable, and wants to go all-in to remove the regime. However, they lack the requisite navy and ground forces to do so. Thus, they pressured the American regime to do what we do.
The reality is, there are 3 reasons to fight the Iranians:
1. Remove their ability to hold global shipping hostage
2. Topple the autocratic regime to replace them with one that values human rights
3. Prevent them from developing nuclear weapons which they have demonstrated the political will to use if given the opportunity.
I believe that Trump is content with 1, and 3. Israel demands 2.
Getting influence in Iraq gave them a land corridor to their ally in the Assad regime. This allowed them to supply Hezbollah in Southern Iran and funnel weapons into the West Bank. Meanwhile, the Houthis could harass Red Sea shipping and the Iranians could choke the Strait of Hormuz.
Iran’s influence on Iraq has waned some, the Assad regime in Syria has been overthrown, Hezbollah is a shadow of its former self after the dicksploding pager incident, the Houthis have been weakened by American and Saudi air strikes, and the Iranian regime is facing large scale resistance both from separatists in the East and from women’s rights advocates in the cities.
Israel sees Iran as vulnerable, and wants to go all-in to remove the regime. However, they lack the requisite navy and ground forces to do so. Thus, they pressured the American regime to do what we do.
The reality is, there are 3 reasons to fight the Iranians:
1. Remove their ability to hold global shipping hostage
2. Topple the autocratic regime to replace them with one that values human rights
3. Prevent them from developing nuclear weapons which they have demonstrated the political will to use if given the opportunity.
I believe that Trump is content with 1, and 3. Israel demands 2.
This post was edited on 3/24/26 at 10:00 am
Posted on 3/24/26 at 9:58 am to Stewiepeters00
quote:
if this is something you feel so strongly about why wont you go overseas and fight or send your family ?
I'm not saying one has to support the operation or not but this line is basically just a tu quoque and appeal to emotion combo. Whether the people advocating for the war would send their own family or not doesn't actually address the question of justification. You can be a hypocrite but also not be wrong. Just food for thought.
This post was edited on 3/24/26 at 9:59 am
Posted on 3/24/26 at 9:58 am to theunknownknight
quote:No?
- we know it isn't nukes
quote:
"Once Iran had a conventional shield of ballistic missiles, it could race toward nuclear weapons unmolested, because nobody could touch it.
Iranian negotiators walked into the room and said, "We have enough material for 11 nuclear bombs, that's our starting position."
Posted on 3/24/26 at 9:59 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
No?
According to Trump, Tulsi Gabbard, and our own intelligence reports.
Correct.
Posted on 3/24/26 at 10:00 am to Stewiepeters00
quote:
Sure it does
Sure what does? Can you explain further? Your comment was vague.
Posted on 3/24/26 at 10:02 am to theunknownknight
lol what justification did you make up for the war in Ukraine?
Posted on 3/24/26 at 10:03 am to ninthward
quote:
lol what justification did you make up for the war in Ukraine?
What? I am one of the posters who lead the charge against that war on this board, because it was just one big money laundering operation.
What has happened to this board?
This post was edited on 3/24/26 at 10:04 am
Posted on 3/24/26 at 10:04 am to Stewiepeters00
quote:
The fact that almost nobody would sign up to actually be deployed over there or send their kids shows you that it's not justified.
No, it doesn't prove that. A person could theoretically be incredibly selfish and desire others to fight a very justified battle for them but that doesn't mean that the cause isn't justified simply because of the behavior of those around it.
By that logic, any field that a person enjoys the benefits of but wouldn't enter themselves would make that field not justified. I would never nor would I want my friends and family to be a police officer that patrols a high crime area of a major blue city but that doesn't mean that there isn't a legitimate need of someone to fill the role.
This post was edited on 3/24/26 at 10:07 am
Posted on 3/24/26 at 10:08 am to Stewiepeters00
quote:
Well I disagree I think they should put their money where their mouth is or frick off
Disagree with what? Is it not a fact that whether someone wants their loved one to fight in a battle or not has nothing to do with whether that battle is justifiable or not? It's two seperate issues. You could make an argument as to why you think this action isn't justified but appealing to the hypocrisy of those who advocate for it proves nothing about it's legitimacy.
quote:
There's nothing more anti Christian than sending others to war for some misguided sense of power or winning
You're also making an ought claim for what people should do in your moral opinion which again is an entirely different discussion. What people ought do or ought not do has nothing to do with whether the operation itself is justifiable.
This post was edited on 3/24/26 at 10:13 am
Posted on 3/24/26 at 10:09 am to theunknownknight
quote:
I'm still waiting for the logical reason we are at war with Iran - we know it isn't nukes
What I don't get is they've been so close to a nuke for years, yet, with no threat at all during 2008-2016 and from 2020-2024, they didn't acquire or construct one.
Then, the US "obliterates" their facilities in 2025 and 6 months later they're just "2 weeks away" again.
Like how so many can't see we are being lied to is a bit unsettling.
Regan, Bush, Clinton, Bush x2, Obama x2, Trump 1, and Biden didn't bomb them. But Trump x2 with the neocons in his ear was willing to do it.
Posted on 3/24/26 at 10:10 am to theunknownknight
because they took our embassy in 1979 and we've properly thanked them now we are, i'm sorry if it was before you were a brown stain on your mothers mattress but it did happen it effects you in no way so sit back and enjoy!
there's your answer boy now run along
there's your answer boy now run along
Posted on 3/24/26 at 10:10 am to theunknownknight
quote:
What libs? I'm more conservative than Trump by a longshot
Are you new here?
There was a time when different perspectives here were discussed and, even if there was no agreement, it avoided the childish name calling and preening of social media.
Those days are long gone, along with voices like BlackHelicopterPilot and TBird. Reasonable voices that just got tired of the crap.
Now, just like anywhere else, you are either “loyal” to Trump (a word used here unironically) or you are a leftist/liberal/cuck. Very little in between.
In 2017, one of my biggest gripes with the coverage of Trump and his voters was that we were all a bunch of angry old white guys. This board has become proof to the lie.
So, yes, you are now a raging liberal.
Posted on 3/24/26 at 10:11 am to Stewiepeters00
quote:
That's actually what the US does at the behest of Israel.
You can't argue with IDS morons.
quote:
I love how the cats out of the bag but you just keep lying it's really just so obtuse
I haven't lied about anything.
Posted on 3/24/26 at 10:12 am to Stewiepeters00
quote:
they just keep doubling down on the same jew world order
IDS.
Posted on 3/24/26 at 10:13 am to theunknownknight
He's been talking about how Iran can't have nukes for at least 10 years and this is somehow a surprise to you?
Popular
Back to top


2









