- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I’m not an ‘election denier’ but there is one thing that is disturbing
Posted on 12/14/22 at 9:23 am to doubleb
Posted on 12/14/22 at 9:23 am to doubleb
quote:
The question isn’t whether or not there was fraud, but whether or not there was enough fraud to change the outcome.
I agree with you that this is the question.
An audit or investigation as requested by Ted Cruz to Congress, or by Rudy and the gang from various state legislatures in Dec 2020 would have answered this question.
The fact that these assholes decided not to perform such investigations will always leave a cloud of suspicion over the legitimacy of Potatus.
The gaslighting is the result of me seeing shite that was no compliant regarding chain of custody, statistical anomalies, 16 yr olds voting, 200,000 fraudulent “indefinitely confined” people, absentee ballots cast in an unconstitutional manner in Pennsylvania and other indisputable evidence of activity that COULD easily have changed the result, and then having some assnole tell me - we can’t investigate whether widespread fraud occurred bc we don’t know before the investigation whether widespread fraud occurred.
Stacy Abrams should be in fricking prison.
0
Posted on 12/14/22 at 9:26 am to Joeybd
quote:
The basis for our elections is the secret ballot.
Why do you think that an election audit would violate that basis?
Posted on 12/14/22 at 9:28 am to Geekboy
Like so many things Leftists and Statists say, there is truth in their statements but the statements are meant to deceive.
Was fraud isolated? Yes, it appears to have been isolated to key precincts in urban areas.
Was fraud widespread? No, it doesn’t appear so. The fraud appears to have been very focused. Trump won the vast majority of bellwether counties, for example.
It’s like the intelligence folks saying the Biden Family laptop had all the earmarks of a Russian operation but then also went on to say that they couldn’t say for sure since they didn’t examine the laptop.
Was fraud isolated? Yes, it appears to have been isolated to key precincts in urban areas.
Was fraud widespread? No, it doesn’t appear so. The fraud appears to have been very focused. Trump won the vast majority of bellwether counties, for example.
It’s like the intelligence folks saying the Biden Family laptop had all the earmarks of a Russian operation but then also went on to say that they couldn’t say for sure since they didn’t examine the laptop.
Posted on 12/14/22 at 9:31 am to Houag80
quote:
Lolololol at the ignorance of this cuck.
Lolololol at the pretend ignorance of this paid cuck.
Posted on 12/14/22 at 9:48 am to TBoy
So how much fraud was there?
Can you answer the OP's question without saying anything along the lines of it being an immaterial amount?
How much fraud would it take to cross the objective line to material?
You actually helped prove his point while projecting what happened. . . as liberals usually do.
Can you answer the OP's question without saying anything along the lines of it being an immaterial amount?
How much fraud would it take to cross the objective line to material?
You actually helped prove his point while projecting what happened. . . as liberals usually do.
Posted on 12/14/22 at 9:52 am to jawnybnsc
So millions of Republicans that use mail in voting have suspect votes now?
Posted on 12/14/22 at 9:54 am to Geekboy
Just glad we have one media outlet, Twitter, that will not censor conservative news and ban, shadowban conservative voices. A start
Posted on 12/14/22 at 9:55 am to Geekboy
quote:
there is one thing that is disturbing
That Biden got 9M more votes than Obama.....that's not disturbing, that's bullshite
Posted on 12/14/22 at 9:55 am to Geekboy
quote:
“Significant.” Who decides how much is ‘significant?’...
Some other words used. ‘Widespread’ ‘Systematic’ to name a few.
Exactly.
Semantic Contortionism (D)
The day Congress allowed the Bent-One to utter this all-time BS "testimony" at his Impeachment -- and get away with it -- was the day the Language and Truth both became a joke:
Bubba: "It depends on what the meaning of the word is is…"
Posted on 12/14/22 at 10:04 am to Geekboy
It's a pretty simple solution. Make the evidence transparent.
Take Arizona 2020. Why would Democrats illegally delete the election data from the computer database only after a judge finally ruled they must turn it over to be examined?
Mail-in ballots. I think a forsenic hands on visual of the ballots procurred after counting was halted in 2020 and 2024 should be done.
If the Democrats didn't cheat, why would you not want to turn those over to be examined and prove yourself the true victor? It's a win-win for them, if it doesn't produce the cheating claimed.
But alas, those things get blocked and covered up. Wonder why?
Take Arizona 2020. Why would Democrats illegally delete the election data from the computer database only after a judge finally ruled they must turn it over to be examined?
Mail-in ballots. I think a forsenic hands on visual of the ballots procurred after counting was halted in 2020 and 2024 should be done.
If the Democrats didn't cheat, why would you not want to turn those over to be examined and prove yourself the true victor? It's a win-win for them, if it doesn't produce the cheating claimed.
But alas, those things get blocked and covered up. Wonder why?
Posted on 12/14/22 at 10:06 am to Geekboy
its their way of admitting it, without having to address it.
in a country with 330M people, what's a few tens\hundreds of thousands of voter fraud? drop in the bucket right? unless those efforts are isolated in areas that happen to close counting locations down in the dark of the night.
in a country with 330M people, what's a few tens\hundreds of thousands of voter fraud? drop in the bucket right? unless those efforts are isolated in areas that happen to close counting locations down in the dark of the night.
Posted on 12/14/22 at 10:07 am to TBoy
quote:
cases of republicans voting twice
Good bait TrollBoy
Posted on 12/14/22 at 10:09 am to Geekboy
quote:
They would say, “there is no ‘SIGNIFICANT’ evidence of election fraud.”
What if I told you that with less than 200,000 votes (way less) to do with what I want I could change the outcome of the last several presidential elections. That’s less than 0.001% of the total votes.
On one hand that small percentage could be considered “not wide spread” on the other hand, flipping the presidency to the loser in every one of the last 4-6 elections seems like a big deal.
Posted on 12/14/22 at 10:10 am to TBoy
quote:
What they mean is that there are isolated cases of republicans voting twice and other similar actions, some of which have led to prosecutions and convictions. However, there is no evidence of any large scale plot or action that could have any material effect on the national election.
indeed several white Republican men were caught voting in 2020 for dead relatives. wives and mothers.
no widespread incidents
Posted on 12/14/22 at 10:11 am to CelticDog
quote:
CelticDog
Posted on 12/14/22 at 10:11 am to Geekboy
quote:
election denier
You're allowing them to control the language. I remember "election deniers" as far back as 2000, and there's a fricking montage of prominent democrats denying Trump's 2016 election. Nobody called them "election deniers". Think about why they need to label you that way.
Posted on 12/14/22 at 10:14 am to Geekboy
Most secure election ever went to well no widespread fraud.
Well whats widespread? every state? or just a few counties?
Same with vaccines....
100% safe and effective. Well weve had breakthrough infections and yeah maybe not everyone should take it.
But you are still a domestic terrorist.
And now all the twitter stuff comes out and I am sitting here like, who is the brain washed ones? Oh yeah. Tboy
Well whats widespread? every state? or just a few counties?
Same with vaccines....
100% safe and effective. Well weve had breakthrough infections and yeah maybe not everyone should take it.
But you are still a domestic terrorist.
And now all the twitter stuff comes out and I am sitting here like, who is the brain washed ones? Oh yeah. Tboy
This post was edited on 12/14/22 at 10:15 am
Posted on 12/14/22 at 10:21 am to Geekboy
Posted on 12/14/22 at 10:22 am to cajunangelle
I though the My Pillow conference settled this?
Widespread and systematic were said in response
to the Trump losers assertions
Widespread and systematic were said in response
to the Trump losers assertions
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News