- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
I’m not an ‘election denier’ but there is one thing that is disturbing
Posted on 12/14/22 at 7:48 am
Posted on 12/14/22 at 7:48 am
I say I’m not a denier because in all honesty I am admitting I’m not educated enough on the subject to make a proclamation on my part.
That being said I have noticed multiple times in the MSM something they always said when referring to the 2020 election and election fraud.
They would say, “there is no ‘SIGNIFICANT’ evidence of election fraud.”
“Significant.” Who decides how much is ‘significant?’ Always found that troubling.
Some other words used. ‘Widespread’ ‘Systematic’ to name a few.
So there definitely WAS election fraud but some people have decided it wasn’t significant or widespread or systematic.
Well then, show us and tell us just exactly how much election fraud there was!
That being said I have noticed multiple times in the MSM something they always said when referring to the 2020 election and election fraud.
They would say, “there is no ‘SIGNIFICANT’ evidence of election fraud.”
“Significant.” Who decides how much is ‘significant?’ Always found that troubling.
Some other words used. ‘Widespread’ ‘Systematic’ to name a few.
So there definitely WAS election fraud but some people have decided it wasn’t significant or widespread or systematic.
Well then, show us and tell us just exactly how much election fraud there was!
25
Posted on 12/14/22 at 7:51 am to Geekboy
What they mean is that there are isolated cases of republicans voting twice and other similar actions, some of which have led to prosecutions and convictions. However, there is no evidence of any large scale plot or action that could have any material effect on the national election.
Posted on 12/14/22 at 7:54 am to TBoy
quote:
What they mean is that there are isolated cases of republicans voting twice
Posted on 12/14/22 at 7:54 am to TBoy
Lolololol at the ignorance of this cuck.
Posted on 12/14/22 at 7:54 am to Geekboy
It's called gaslighting. It's the same as when the article headline includes "Trump's false claims" or "Trump's baseless claims".
and Tboy, if you really honestly believe that, then you should do some serious self reflection.
and Tboy, if you really honestly believe that, then you should do some serious self reflection.
Posted on 12/14/22 at 7:54 am to Geekboy
It's OK to be an election denier.....nothing wrong with questioning compelling data that points to fraud.
The entire election debate could be ended if the DEMS would prove they did not cheat.....they can't, so they won't.
It is not the count of votes, it is the legality of the votes that are counted....this is where the fight starts.
The entire election debate could be ended if the DEMS would prove they did not cheat.....they can't, so they won't.
It is not the count of votes, it is the legality of the votes that are counted....this is where the fight starts.
This post was edited on 12/14/22 at 8:09 am
Posted on 12/14/22 at 7:56 am to TBoy
quote:Should be Low-TBoy
TBoy
Posted on 12/14/22 at 8:21 am to TBoy
quote:
What they mean is that there are isolated cases of republicans voting twice and other similar actions, some of which have led to prosecutions and convictions. However, there is no evidence of any large scale plot or action that could have any material effect on the national election.
Anyone with an ounce of integrity will admit the 2020 election was illegitimate
quote:
TBoy
Confirmed.
Posted on 12/14/22 at 8:23 am to Geekboy
I think it’s because they obviously can’t say there was absolutely zero instances.
Posted on 12/14/22 at 8:24 am to TBoy
quote:
What they mean is that there are isolated cases of republicans voting twice and other similar actions, some of which have led to prosecutions and convictions
yep - that is precisely what it means
Posted on 12/14/22 at 8:29 am to Geekboy
It is how they cover. Once it is discovered they will claim we knew it was there but we just did not know it was significant.
Much like the media yesterday who created fear which caused schools and businesses to shut down due to a "significant" weather event that DID NOT HAPPEN!!
These media people have so many of you programmed and it is a shame!!
Much like the media yesterday who created fear which caused schools and businesses to shut down due to a "significant" weather event that DID NOT HAPPEN!!
These media people have so many of you programmed and it is a shame!!
Posted on 12/14/22 at 8:31 am to Geekboy
quote:
I’m not an ‘election denier’ but there is one thing that is disturbing
Anyone who has faith in our Electoral Systems in 2022 is a fking idiot and is too stupid to be allowed to vote.
This post was edited on 12/14/22 at 8:32 am
Posted on 12/14/22 at 8:34 am to Geekboy
Fraud or not, the point now is to leave conservatives disenfranchised with the electoral process to the point that they quit going to the polls.
"What is the point of voting."
That is the game. It is working.
"What is the point of voting."
That is the game. It is working.
Posted on 12/14/22 at 8:37 am to oldskule
Stop calling them votes. What the Dems are doing is harvesting and counting ballots. A vote is something different. A vote can be directly and indisputably tied to a single, living human being. Hopefully, one who is actually legally possessing of the franchise. ALL of that is under suspicion, as far as I'm concerned. By design and right under our noses.
Posted on 12/14/22 at 8:39 am to oldskule
quote:
The entire election debate could be ended if the DEMS would prove they did not cheat.....they can't, so they won't.
It is not the count of votes, it is the legality of the votes that are counted....this is where the fight starts.
I would be willing to bet my last decades wages that if an Audit was performed with the same standards and skill that are performed on businesses and financial institutions, in key areas of the county to determine whether or not vote counting protocols were followed based upon the requirements of the respective communities... the results would be shocking even by election deniers standards...
Posted on 12/14/22 at 8:44 am to MasterDigger
quote:
Should be Low-TBoy
Always has been and always will be.
Posted on 12/14/22 at 8:48 am to Geekboy
There probably had never been a presidential election with no fraud.
The question isn’t whether or not there was fraud, but whether or not there was enough fraud to change the outcome.
People live to say there’s no way Biden got 81 million votes; thus beating Trump by 7+ million votes. And some seriously believed somehow the Dems created or changed millions of votes. I don’t believe that.
But the real question is did the Dems do things in states where the vote was close to swing the election their way? That’s what no one has ever proven even though they have shown that there were irregularities.
Proving irregularities is easy. Proving fraud on a scale of thousands is tougher.
But mail in voting and early write in voting has opened up opportunities that question the integrity of the system. When you vote in person there are people that witness your vote and they validate your vote at the same time. This is being lost and it is definitely open for fraud.
The question isn’t whether or not there was fraud, but whether or not there was enough fraud to change the outcome.
People live to say there’s no way Biden got 81 million votes; thus beating Trump by 7+ million votes. And some seriously believed somehow the Dems created or changed millions of votes. I don’t believe that.
But the real question is did the Dems do things in states where the vote was close to swing the election their way? That’s what no one has ever proven even though they have shown that there were irregularities.
Proving irregularities is easy. Proving fraud on a scale of thousands is tougher.
But mail in voting and early write in voting has opened up opportunities that question the integrity of the system. When you vote in person there are people that witness your vote and they validate your vote at the same time. This is being lost and it is definitely open for fraud.
Posted on 12/14/22 at 9:00 am to Geekboy
There are irregularities in almost every election. These are often just clerical type errors, and sometimes there is fraud. Saying there is no significant irregularities means there weren’t enough confirmed irregularities and/or fraud to swing the election.
Posted on 12/14/22 at 9:01 am to TomJoadGhost
quote:
Saying there is no significant irregularities means there weren’t enough confirmed irregularities and/or fraud to swing the election.
In a state or nationally? Because Wisconsin has enough every election to swing their elections.
Posted on 12/14/22 at 9:08 am to klrstix
quote:
I would be willing to bet my last decades wages that if an Audit was performed with the same standards and skill that are performed on businesses and financial institutions, in key areas of the county
Truly astounding lack of coherent thought.
The basis for our elections is the secret ballot.
Like the confessional to the Catholics, the secret ballot is sacrosanct.
How un-American can you be.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News