- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 9/19/25 at 8:15 am to Badface
Just show him the Google results kf a search for "Rose City Antifa".
Posted on 9/19/25 at 8:18 am to Badface
There are radicals who loosely identify
as “ANTIFA”, but they are not particularly well-organized and communicate online, via texts, etc.
Of course, there occasionally are protesters who hold up a banner with ANTIFA written on it, but they’re not members of anything in particular.
as “ANTIFA”, but they are not particularly well-organized and communicate online, via texts, etc.
Of course, there occasionally are protesters who hold up a banner with ANTIFA written on it, but they’re not members of anything in particular.
This post was edited on 9/19/25 at 8:24 am
Posted on 9/19/25 at 9:19 am to Diamondawg
quote:
quote:
Proving something isn't real is generally harder. To prove something is real, you often just need one clear, verifiable piece of evidence—say, a fossil for a dinosaur or a photo for a UFO sighting. To prove something isn't real, you must rule out every possible instance of its existence, which can be nearly impossible due to the vastness of the universe or the limits of current technology. For example, proving unicorns don't exist requires checking every corner of the Earth (and beyond) where they could hypothetically be, while proving they do exist only takes one undeniable unicorn sighting. Absence of evidence isn't the same as evidence of absence, which makes disproving trickier.
The onus is on you. You can do it! (This is from Grok BTW)
Grok makes a very poor description of evidence.
While a dinosaur fossil is an excellent direct source of evidence, the other examples that the model indicates as evidence are not. A photo can be faked or misidentified, a unicorn sighting can be false or simple misidentification. Evidence is tangible and mostly irrefutable. A fossil, direct contact with an alien craft or creature, and a live captured unicorn are equivalent. Those examples described by Grok are not equivalent sources of evidence.
Posted on 9/19/25 at 9:33 am to Badface
Why do you care? Disassociate from that individual
Posted on 9/19/25 at 9:43 am to VOR
quote:
There are radicals who loosely identify as “ANTIFA”, but they are not particularly well-organized and communicate online, via texts, etc. Of course, there occasionally are protesters who hold up a banner with ANTIFA written on it, but they’re not members of anything in particular.
Seriously, why are you Antifa simps continuing to lie about this “doesnt exist” shite even today. Your lies arent working anymore. They arent winning you elections. They arent winning hearts and minds. They arent fooling anybody who doesn’t want to be fooled.
What good does it do? Does it make you feel better to try and believe the lie yourself? Is it weak arse attempt by Antifa at obfuscating truth legally when charges are pressed to avoid Rico?
Im legitimately asking because I dont get it AT ALL.
Posted on 9/19/25 at 9:46 am to Badface
quote:
by a super lib acquaintance.
Tell him, if they are not real, then "they" and you have nothing to worry about.
Posted on 9/19/25 at 9:52 am to Badface
The "antifa is just an idea' crowd fascinates me.
If you had the time, you could probably find 1000+ videos from the past decade of these self-described "antifa" activists dressed all in black showing up in multiple Western countries doing everything from their usual scream, intimidate, and assault schtick to full-blown rioting.
But because they're so loosely organized and don't always carry the antifa banner, they don't exist?
It's amazing to watch.
If you had the time, you could probably find 1000+ videos from the past decade of these self-described "antifa" activists dressed all in black showing up in multiple Western countries doing everything from their usual scream, intimidate, and assault schtick to full-blown rioting.
But because they're so loosely organized and don't always carry the antifa banner, they don't exist?
It's amazing to watch.
Posted on 9/19/25 at 9:55 am to BK Lounge
quote:
As a card-carrying dyed-in-the-wool ‘above it all’ Registered Independent
Assuming this is a troll post, but I'll play along.
quote:
Can anyone make it make sense as to why the far right lunatic fringe has turned these into slurs ?
Because those that say they are anti-fiscist started using actual fascism, intimidation, and violence to try and implement their communistic worldview, and are justifiably ridiculed for their hypocrisy. Antifa isn't fighting fascism today and hasn't been this millennium. Pretending they are is an insult to any that actually had to endure fascism.
This post was edited on 9/19/25 at 10:02 am
Posted on 9/19/25 at 9:57 am to BK Lounge
quote:
I am old enough to remember when Antifa literally stood for “anti-fascist”.. until the far right co-opted it and made it into a slur
You are a dolt if you believe all of the communist double speak. I recommend reading “1984”.
Posted on 9/19/25 at 10:00 am to Badface
I have never met a ANTIFA member… no one I know has either… doesn’t mean they don’t exist though… have anyone on here ever met one or know someone who has??
Posted on 9/19/25 at 10:27 am to the808bass
quote:
That’s not an important question at all.
This becomes important more legally than conceptually, but, conceptually, if we want to call "Antifa" something vague and generic like "organized crime" then yes, it's not important.
Legally it becomes much more important (but I know you don't care as much about that).
Antifa is indisputably real in terms of a multitude of local chapters (to answer OP's question).
Antifa as a unified, singular organization is a much more strenuous argument.
And that's by design. The idea is based around decentralization.
Posted on 9/19/25 at 10:29 am to Badface
I’m being asked to prove that ANTIFA is real
Posted on 9/19/25 at 10:45 am to cajunangelle
Dlt
This post was edited on 9/19/25 at 10:46 am
Posted on 9/19/25 at 10:48 am to 4x4tiger
Perfect . . . tell him here's one getting KTFO!
Posted on 9/19/25 at 10:55 am to Badface
ANTIFA = FASCISTS. They are so confused. The Mussolini black shirts and Hitler black shirts that precede the brown shirts. That’s them.
Posted on 9/19/25 at 11:00 am to paulb52
quote:
ANTIFA = FASCISTS. They are so confused.
Some are definitely confused and are useful idiots/pawns. But many are aware and embrace the obvious doublespeak of the name Antifa.
Posted on 9/19/25 at 11:03 am to VOR
Antifa is well organized with chapters globally. They are now recognized as a domestic terror network in the US, The Netherlands, and Hungary.
Posted on 9/19/25 at 11:09 am to Badface
Why would anybody have a lib acquaintance? I'd rather slide naked down a slide of razor blades dowsed in rubbing alcohol
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News