Favorite team:Auburn 
Location:Alabama
Biography:All the non-sordid details
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:1799
Registered on:1/17/2013
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

Congress can create entities that operate outside of the control of the Executive. Congress can close them down too.


Pretty vague and meaningless statement without providing Constitutional context.

If by operating "outside the control of the Executive", then surely these "entities" would be restricted to purely legislative purposes, like advising or the creation of rules, regulations, or laws. There would be no executive function of enforcement without the Executive.

If these "entities" were authorized by the Legislative with enforcement powers, they would immediately fall under the purview of the Executive, correct?
Don't mind me, just passing through.

quote:

He was averaging 8.5 wins per season


The National Championship loss changed Gus Malzahn for the worse. He became more tentative in his playcalling. With no will to take risks, his offenses stuttered. I think it was best for both Auburn and Malzahn to part: he needed the reset and Auburn needed to get away from one dimensionality.
quote:

by not helping others


quote:

That ability to help others


quote:

so many are against helping other countries


quote:

By helping others countries in a responsible manner


quote:

how much should we help other countries


quote:

“The best way to help yourself is to help others”


Define the word "help". You've rage baited enough without actually defining the term debated.

You also take issue with others having opinion that differs, such as the
quote:

not allowing legal immigration, not sending funds to other countries, not helping other countries at all
crowd. Almost as if you are attempting to create consensus upon the nebulous term "help". If you were to be successful, then "help" becomes whatever those with control of the purse strings want it to mean. You therefore appear to be trying to maintain the status quo, which makes your multiple mentions of USAID a bit suspicious.

Taxes are a taking of food from the mouths of the citizenry here. They have a say in what is done with that money. When times are abundant, one may be a little looser with the pocket book, but when times are lean, it is not in anyone's interest to spend wrecklessly. The public is receiving mixed signals that times are both abundant and lean simultaneously. Therefore, it should be expected that a wide range of opinions on spending should occur.

I personally don't think anyone should engage you on this topic until you clarify.
quote:

Elon calls it “Bitcoin-style encryption,” built for real privacy


quote:

add an injection of private equity, essentially selling off part of its new corporate enterprise to an outside investor


What does that even look like?

quote:

has crystallized around a 20-year, $2.4 billion investment from the California Pension Fund


So, the thing that the students created oh-so-many years ago, that became a feature of the Public University system, is to be dismantled and sold to... California? Fans, students, alumns should riot at the very notion.
Referring to human beings as "surplus" is disgusting.
quote:

they are bad


1000 commercials per game and 1000 yellow flags thrown per game.
quote:

The point she lists here is so fundamentally similar to the first that it's inclusion is either disingenuous or ignorant (both of which reflect poorly on someone teaching it).



Alternative position:

She is admitting a fetishization of white males. They "appeal" to her hopes and dreams, however, she fears her desire for them (for whatever reason). She projects this forbidden lust onto the plural "people" in order to distance herself subconsciously from these thoughts that disturb her.
quote:

The problem is that Harvard graduates will go into white collar jobs and their companies are not interested in being equal to their competitors.


The children of the nobility do not worry with trivial things like labor beyond managing the whip-bearers.
The King collects



And if he fails to distribute, he becomes



And then the nobles become the

quote:

"How many on the Left are waking up just like this young woman?"


Guess there's a new name on the "From:" line on her checks.

quote:

That person is phucked for life. They'll have a mountain of debt and be crying now or in 4 years for how crappy their life is with a Harvard degree and no job prospect.


Wrong. It's cheaper to go to Harvard than most schools.

quote:

Approximately $19,500 per year
The average student at Harvard pays approximately $19,500 per year after all financial aid is factored in, according to recent data. However, the total cost of attendance, including tuition and fees, is around $82,866. Additionally, the average net price for students receiving need-based aid is about $15,126.

--Harvard University


quote:

$200,000 or less annually
Harvard University has made its education free for families earning $200,000 or less annually, with the expansion of financial aid beginning in the 2025-26 academic year. This means that students from families with incomes below this threshold will not have to pay tuition fees.
CNBC

quote:

Soooooo instead of going to class to try to learn and take notes to better your grade, you stayed in bed crying? You deserve your bad grades.


The person doesn't even get "graded" in the traditional sense.
quote:

Undergraduate students can take up to 11 courses out of 32 on a PA/FL basis, though traditionally, there has not been a strong culture of using the system widely, as some majors or general education requirements historically required letter grades .

The PA/FL grading option is especially used in independent study courses, while other introductory courses have gradually incorporated related Satisfactory/Unsatisfactory (SAT/UNS) policies. For instance, in 2010, there was a proposal to eliminate letter grades in the CS50 course in favor of SAT/UNS, allowing students to receive SAT in place of A through C- and UNS instead of D+ through E.
This initiative led to the successful introduction of SAT/UNS in CS50 in 2013, with the option later becoming the default in 2017.

The PA/FL system provides students flexibility to explore courses outside their primary areas of study without the stress associated with conventional letter grading. It is designed to encourage intellectual exploration, though students’ choice of major or concentration may still limit how many courses they take Pass/Fail .
The system has historically existed alongside standard letter grades, giving students the option to preserve their GPA or approach challenging subjects at lower risk.
.
In summary, Harvard’s pass/fail grading system has been a long-standing feature of undergraduate education, allowing students to take multiple courses PA/FL for both curricular flexibility and academic experimentation, with formal historical evidence of its use going back several decades and specific program implementations, such as in CS50, becoming prominent since 2010

-Harvard University

.
quote:

At Harvard College, the Pass/Fail (PA/FL) option allows students to complete courses with a grade of Pass (equivalent to A through D-) or Fail (equivalent to an E), providing an alternative to letter grading while maintaining academic credit.
How Pass/Fail Works
The PA/FL system evaluates student performance as follows:
Pass (PA): Represents a range of letter grades from A to D-
1
. This indicates that the student has met course requirements satisfactorily.
Fail (FL): Represents the letter grade E only
1
. This denotes work that is unsatisfactory and does not earn credit.
Undergraduate students admitted to a course on a Pass/Fail basis are identified on the grade sheet, and only PA or FL can be submitted for such students
1
. Independent study courses also use PA/FL grading.
quote:

The logic of the free market working out well for the people is coming to a very fricking abrupt end.


I think we should give it a try first before declaring it dead.
"Why can't I just underpay my imported wage slaves in peace?!?"
~Lionface, probably
quote:

US government could take 10% stake in public companies


The free market is working so well that we should take it public! /s
quote:


You must not have read my first response.


Ah, yes, 4 paragraphs in, I do see that you mentioned your gut.

quote:

I was asking for evidence for OP to support his/her position. I also wanted to clarify the type of evidence OP would accept to counter his/her beliefs


Why? Why, specifically, have you come here to counter OP's opinion? It's one thing to discuss a topic or have an opinion, it's a whole other thing to have an AGENDA when posting.
quote:

I think this is a good place to start. For a conversation this important, that also has a lot potential to get derailed, it is important to establish some baselines. I hope it is clear, I am not trying to just troll here. You asked the initial question and asked for thoughts on your position, so I am happy to engage.

Questions 1-4 above are simple Yes/No questions that we can easily support or disprove. For question 5, I was admittedly not aware of this, but definitely want to know which DEM congresspeople directly called for REPs to be killed. That in no way is ok.


quote:

How would you compare and contrast rhetoric on the right verse rhetoric on the left.


The question was how would YOU compare and contrast, not "thoughts on [OP's] position". This "I'm just trying to get a better understanding" ploy that you're implementing is insulting to the OP. He's not a child to be led to a conclusion. Make your pitch about your position.

Additionally, who is "we"?
quote:

Questions 1-4 above are simple Yes/No questions that we can easily support or disprove.

You and OP, or you and your Discord/Reddit cohort?