- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How soon before Trump starts arresting crooked lawyers and Judges for obstruction?
Posted on 2/10/25 at 11:13 am to CU_Tigers4life
Posted on 2/10/25 at 11:13 am to CU_Tigers4life
Would it be a good idea for Trumps legal team to "appeal" all of his EO's immediately with favorable judges to get a ruling on the legality to get ahead of the liberals that had their left wing judges in the bullpen?
0
Posted on 2/10/25 at 11:13 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Hopefully never. That indicates a failed state and authoritarian takeover.
The very existence of LawFare indicates a failed state and authoritarian takeover.
I don't think I have seen a single lawyer who went full TDS Retard in 2017 admit they have been wrong about anything despite being wrong about nearly everything.
Posted on 2/10/25 at 11:14 am to SlowFlowPro
Who’s talking to you, Spectrum?
I was referring to your buddy Decatur. Try to keep up. It’s not ALWAYS all about YOU.
I was referring to your buddy Decatur. Try to keep up. It’s not ALWAYS all about YOU.
This post was edited on 2/10/25 at 11:15 am
Posted on 2/10/25 at 11:14 am to CU_Tigers4life
They have to be impeached, or voted out - this is why fixing our elections is imperative. It will take a decade, or more, but with secure elections these judges will lose their seats and eventually things will swing around.
Posted on 2/10/25 at 11:15 am to CU_Tigers4life
Why don't you just crown Trump as King and ruler?
Posted on 2/10/25 at 11:16 am to Scruffy
quote:
The ball seems to only roll in one direction.
It doesn't though. Plenty of TROs were issue against Biden during his term, by forum-shopped judges. They just weren't amplified on here and the media you consume b/c it's not targeted to show the total picture, and is targeted to elicit the (incorrect) response above.
quote:
The process simply rinses and repeats.
That's because the system is designed that way. That's why we have multiple levels of oversight.
Can some things be tightened? Sure, but that will require a statutory change to the civil procedure overall (not a partisan effort towards "one side").
Posted on 2/10/25 at 11:17 am to Hodag
quote:
The very existence of LawFare indicates a failed state and authoritarian takeover.
Again, perfect example of why these malleable terms used as memes for NPC distribution are dangerous, and why I feel it's important to respond to them.
Posted on 2/10/25 at 11:19 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Again, perfect example of why these malleable terms used as memes for NPC distribution are dangerous, and why I feel it's important to respond to them.
Posted on 2/10/25 at 11:21 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
authoritarian takeover
Like judges using a TRO to demand data be destroyed?
Posted on 2/10/25 at 11:21 am to Bard
quote:
Like judges using a TRO to demand data be destroyed?
Only when there is no oversight over this being done ex-parte. Then it would be comparable to an authoritarian regime.
Posted on 2/10/25 at 11:22 am to Jbird
My overarching point has been proven twice today.
I'm very glad I spent so much time the past few years laying the groundwork.
W after W after W
I'm very glad I spent so much time the past few years laying the groundwork.
W after W after W
Posted on 2/10/25 at 11:25 am to CU_Tigers4life
POTUS should have no involvement with sitting Judges. However, there should be some process where the Senate Judiciary can call some Judges back in the explain their decisions when the judges action lack merit or has clear evidence of judicial mismanagement. Maybe an oversight court overseen through appointment by each of the SCOTUS Judges for referral for impeachment??
Posted on 2/10/25 at 11:25 am to Bard
quote:Look below.
Like judges using a TRO to demand data be destroyed?
That is the libertarian SFP.
Government ordering government to destroy data.
SFP: “Fine to do that, as long as there is oversight of the data destruction.”
quote:Waiting for the “that isn’t what I said” post.
Only when there is no oversight over this being done ex-parte.
This post was edited on 2/10/25 at 11:26 am
Posted on 2/10/25 at 11:28 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Like some kind of ‘intellectual’ knight-errant. You are so full of yourself it sometimes makes me laugh but mostly just roll my eyes at how predictably phony you are…
I try to combat
Posted on 2/10/25 at 11:29 am to Scruffy
quote:
SFP: “Fine to do that, as long as there is oversight of the data destruction.”
Straw man
That is literally not what I said
Why devolve yourself to intellectual dishonesty like that?
quote:
Waiting for the “that isn’t what I said” post.
Oversight of the ruling, Scruffy, not the data destruction. Oversight that will almost assuredly stay and reverse this decision.
In an authoritarian regime,that oversight won't exist.
Posted on 2/10/25 at 11:36 am to CU_Tigers4life
quote:
Is this something that is coming? Now will never be a better time
You can't jail judges because you don't like their rulings, even if you don't believe there is legal justification for the rulings. For all of the bluster from Democrats about threats to Democracy, that would be a legitimate case if Trump started doing it.
My guess is Trump expected every bit of this pushback and will let it play out within the legal system. He has been in office less than a month. We don't have to get everything through in the first couple of weeks.
Posted on 2/10/25 at 11:36 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Hopefully never. That indicates a failed state and authoritarian takeover.
I think that’s what these people want.
Posted on 2/10/25 at 11:38 am to Froman
quote:
I think that’s what these people want.
No that's still dramatic. They're just in the process of dehumanizing their outgroup, but they're not advocating for authoritarianism, directly at least. It's clear that people giving them these NPC talking points seem to want to get that power
Posted on 2/10/25 at 11:38 am to OGtigerfan87
quote:
I mean posters dislike for SFP aside he is right here its a terrible, impulsive, and short sighted idea.
He has absolutely zero issue with lawfare against Trump. Then pretends to have morals when a leftist could be targeted.
Posted on 2/10/25 at 11:41 am to CU_Tigers4life
That's a dangerous path to start down. Now, impeachments, I'm all for.
Page 2 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News