- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How soon before Trump starts arresting crooked lawyers and Judges for obstruction?
Posted on 2/10/25 at 11:42 am to FightinTigersDammit
Posted on 2/10/25 at 11:42 am to FightinTigersDammit
quote:
That's a dangerous path to start down. Now, impeachments, I'm all for.
Correct. There is already a way to examine these issues within our current system and Constitution
1
Posted on 2/10/25 at 11:43 am to CU_Tigers4life
quote:
Trump starts arresting
Wtf.
Posted on 2/10/25 at 11:44 am to texag7
quote:
He has absolutely zero issue with lawfare against Trump.
Great example of the emotional manipulation used to create NPC talking points and group sync/echo Chambers.
Just because I didn't melt down at a level deemed appropriate, that means I somehow support it, without me ever saying so. This is like in North Korea when people get jailed for not crying hard enough when the dear leader dies.
Posted on 2/10/25 at 11:46 am to SlowFlowPro
Of course, given the current makeup of the Senate, convictions are doubtful.
Posted on 2/10/25 at 11:48 am to FightinTigersDammit
By design (similar to why Trump wasn't convicted either time)
Posted on 2/10/25 at 11:48 am to SlowFlowPro
Now you stepped in it.
Posted on 2/10/25 at 12:06 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Hopefully never. That indicates a failed state and authoritarian takeover.
Posted on 2/10/25 at 12:07 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This is what happens with partisan brain rot and dehumanizing the out group.
Dude. You cling to the constitutional arguments all the time but suddenly think it's irrelevant? You trying to claim anyone else is partisan is transparent bullshite.
Posted on 2/10/25 at 12:17 pm to junkfunky
Wonder if any of the crooked lawyers or Judges have overstated the value of assets in order to get a loan
Posted on 2/10/25 at 12:33 pm to junkfunky
quote:
Dude. You cling to the constitutional arguments all the time but suddenly think it's irrelevant?
What?
Decatur implied MAGA wants authoritarianism. I told him that was silly and explained what was really going on.
Where do "constitutional arguments" fit into that discussion tree?
Posted on 2/10/25 at 12:34 pm to SlowFlowPro
Is that why Biden did it?
Wasn’t cool when he was arresting lawyers for Muh Insurrection when they were just giving legal advice.
That said, it’s not as if judges and lawyers can’t commit actual crimes. If either were involved in some kind of criminal activity that is an actual, as opposed to made up crime-
I’m fine with them going down.
Wasn’t cool when he was arresting lawyers for Muh Insurrection when they were just giving legal advice.
That said, it’s not as if judges and lawyers can’t commit actual crimes. If either were involved in some kind of criminal activity that is an actual, as opposed to made up crime-
I’m fine with them going down.
Posted on 2/10/25 at 12:34 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This is what happens when both sides succumb to populism
FIFY
Posted on 2/10/25 at 12:38 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
authoritarian takeover.
By who, government officials or rogue judges? Apparently judges have more authoritatian power than a president does. If that's the case maybe it's time to start electing federal judges by the voting public because judgeships have definitely become political over the last 10-15 years.
Posted on 2/10/25 at 12:40 pm to FightinTigersDammit
quote:The problem is, any punishment of a judge who oversteps their bounds is extremely rare.
Now, impeachments, I'm all for.
All that ever happens is akin to a strongly worded letter.
That is why judge-shopping with horrendous rulings occur over and over again.
No one ever faces consequences.
People always talk about police officers never being punished.
Judges facing consequences for their actions is so astronomically rare that it makes punishments of police officers seem common.
Judges are afforded far too much leeway and they need to be reined in.
Posted on 2/10/25 at 12:42 pm to Scruffy
quote:
Judges are afforded far too much leeway and they need to be reined in.
We absolutely need more judicial oversight.
But it can't look like locking judges up unless they truly break the law.
For that matter, we (obviously) need more oversight on everything. I would never have said that we could actually trust the government, but it's worse than I thought it was.
Posted on 2/10/25 at 12:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Hopefully never. That indicates a failed state and authoritarian takeover.
In all seriousness, what's the appropriate response to a politically-motivated judiciary that is only emboldened when the administration uses the judicial system to respond to abuse of said system?
Posted on 2/10/25 at 12:47 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:We do, but it needs to have teeth.
We absolutely need more judicial oversight.
Right now it’s akin to simply saying “their ruling was wrong and it was poorly constructed, they should feel bad”.
Nothing more than a strongly worded letter.
Judges that make insane rulings that are tossed out by higher courts need to immediately face a review board to justify their actions.
If their arguments are not legally sound, they immediately lose their judgeship.
This post was edited on 2/10/25 at 12:49 pm
Posted on 2/10/25 at 1:04 pm to Scruffy
Maybe decisions could be peer reviewed?
Posted on 2/10/25 at 1:07 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Only when there is no oversight over this being done ex-parte.
Which is what happened. The judge issued the TRO with the complete absence of any representation of the White House and in the TRO demanded the deletion of data.
Posted on 2/10/25 at 1:08 pm to FightinTigersDammit
quote:
Maybe decisions could be peer reviewed?
Something needs to be figured out.
Bad judicial rulings that are not legally sound need to have consequences.
Page 3 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News