re: Hospital stops Ivermectin even after a drop from 100% Vent to 50%..Wife goes back to court

Why are we playing politics with people's lives?

Why aren't we holding China responsible?

We aren't we willing to try anything?

quote:

---

So y’all are OK with judges being doctors now too?

---

I'm not ok with you being a doctor.

Exactly, there in lies the scam. You test positive for covid from faulty test that are wrong more than right. You have mild symptoms, they put you in hospital, give you remdesivir your kidneys fail your lungs fill with water develop pneumonia they put you on the ventilator you lay there till you die. Hospital gets 50 thousand for the death you get a dead relative media get another statistic. Plandremic stays alive. Wake the frick up people!

quote:

---

If patients have the right to a do not resuscitate order which the doctor abides with and the patient dies, then why shouldn't a doctor have to abide by a "I want to try ivermectin" order in which a patient may possible live?

---

That reminds me.. what's the bounty on wuflu patients who die on a vent? $58k was the last number I heard.

Giving hospitals a monetary incentive to watch people die is heinous. Giving them cover with proscribed recommended treatments is icing on the Death Cake.

the judge said no today.

quote:

---

Judge Michael Oster, Jr., of Butler County’s Court of Common Pleas, heard arguments in the case Thursday and Friday before issuing his ruling on Monday morning.

“While this court is sympathetic to the Plaintiff and understands the idea of wanting to do anything to help her loved one, public policy should not and does not support allowing a physician to try ‘any’ type of treatment on human beings,” he wrote. “Rather, public policy supports the safe and effective development of medications and treatments.”

---

quote:

---

“As a citizen, it would be easy to think about wanting to help someone in Jeff Smith’s condition, no matter the law,” Oster said. “As a judge, the present case invites allowing emotions to steer one towards judicial activism. However, our legal system must stay firmly rooted in proper legal interpretation of the law, not what individual judges think the law should be.”

The ruling comes as ivermectin continues to fly off the shelves across the country. The number of ivermectin prescriptions issued nationwide in the week ending Aug. 13 topped 88,000 — a whopping 24-fold increase from pre-pandemic levels, according to the CDC.

The stunning numbers are also associated with an increase of adverse effects and hospital visits stemming from ivermectin use.

Video: Ivermectin exposure calls to Alabama poison center have doubled (MSNBC)
Current Time 3:07
/
Duration 10:00
0
Ivermectin exposure calls to Alabama poison center have doubled

The drug is primarily used to treat or prevent parasites in large animals, like horses, sheep and cattle. The FDA does support the use of ivermectin tablets in humans, but only at “very specific doses” to treat some parasitic worms, according to the agency.

But Americans are not only using ivermectin for a disease it was not intended to treat, but many of them are self-medicating with the veterinary version of the drug, a dangerous decision that could lead to toxic effects, seizures, hallucinations, coma and death, according to the FDA.

“You are not a horse. You are not a cow,” the agency said in a tweet last month. “Seriously, y’all. Stop it.”

Mississippi hospital patient ingested livestock medication believed by some to treat COVID

Court documents show Jeffrey Smith tested positive for COVID-19 on July 9 and was hospitalized a week later. As his condition continued to decline, he was sedated, intubated and placed on a ventilator on Aug. 1.

His wife asked hospital officials to treat him with ivermectin, but they refused. She then went to Dr. Waghsul, a pulmonologist who defends using the drug as a COVID-19 treatment, and obtained a prescription from him.

But at last week’s court hearing, Waghsul was only able to say that the patient “seems to be” getting better after receiving the drug and said, “I honestly don’t know,” when asked if continued use of ivermectin would benefit him, Judge Oster said in his ruling.

In addition, Oster said, Jeffrey Smith could be “safely” transferred to another hospital where Wagshul has privileges and continue the treatment there if his family desires — without forcing West Chester to do so.

“The Defendant Hospital wants to follow what it believes are appropriate medical standards and make the husband get better using these protocols,” Oster said.

The judge also noted that all parties involved in the lawsuit want Jeffrey Smith to get better and that the only bad actor involved in this situation is the virus.

LINK

---

The judge is full of shite

What, no mention of lupus treatment…. Over 1.2 million Americans on ivermectin

I would bring him home with a nurse and dr on vent and ivermectin and watch him recover and then sue the hospital

Oh… the judge is an arse

quote:

---

My locals doctors and myself hope that we don't find ourselves in this situation.

---

In the event that you do, explore the patients preferred treatment as long as it is within the legal bounds of the law. They have the right to try and whether it works or not, Ivermectin is a small price to pay to satisfy the patient.

quote:

---

So y’all are OK with judges being doctors now too?

---

A doctor prescribed it...

quote:

---

Go suck off Fauci.

You enjoy watching people die needlessly don't you.

---

He's probably dancing a jog right now.