- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/26/26 at 6:56 pm to L.A.
quote:
Notice anything that's missing?
The top 5 important years in human history
Posted on 7/26/26 at 6:57 pm to L.A.
Establishment of the written laws of Hammarbi. First written. about 1500 bc
Hiroshima nuclear bomb in 1945
Mongols invade Japan
Man on the moon
Leif Erricson visits Boston
Jesus
The Ten Commandments
invention of the compass
invention of the steam engine
add invention of printing press
gunpowder
telegraph
antibiotics
all of he above has had a bigger impact than the 5 listed. history.com read the wrong books
Hiroshima nuclear bomb in 1945
Mongols invade Japan
Man on the moon
Leif Erricson visits Boston
Jesus
The Ten Commandments
invention of the compass
invention of the steam engine
add invention of printing press
gunpowder
telegraph
antibiotics
all of he above has had a bigger impact than the 5 listed. history.com read the wrong books
This post was edited on 7/26/26 at 7:03 pm
Posted on 7/26/26 at 6:57 pm to udtiger
quote:
The top 5 important years in human history
I think it got 2 or 3 right personally.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 8:20 pm to Azkiger
quote:
Maybe if you addressed my initial comment you'd get the same respect
I answered it directly. Sorry your reading comprehension isn’t my problem
Posted on 7/26/26 at 8:54 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
Pretty dumb to exclude any date related to christianity.
I don’t know which one I would pick. Probably 380 when christianity became the official state religion of Rome would be my choice.
Oddly enough, even though our calendar is based on the timing of Jesus' birth, I would argue 33 AD (traditional date of Jesus' crucifixion) and 325 AD (Nicaea) are probably more important dates for the impact that Christianity had on the world.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 8:59 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
What changed?
I wonder why before common era and common era…..hmmm. What happened that changed?
Irony and not in a good way.
I mean, Issac newton? Magna Carta? Napoleon? Hapsburg? Split of the Carolingian Empire? And we aren’t even mentioning Jesus…
Posted on 7/26/26 at 9:04 pm to L.A.
2019 CE: The greatest team in the history of organized sport is assembled in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 9:10 pm to AbuTheMonkey
i think they’re more important to christianity for sure.
But becoming the official religion of Rome marks christianity really taking lead in europe.
But becoming the official religion of Rome marks christianity really taking lead in europe.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 9:14 pm to L.A.
At least the Neolithic Revolution got an honorable mention. That would be No 1 in my book, way above anything else.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 9:20 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
i think they’re more important to christianity for sure.
But becoming the official religion of Rome marks christianity really taking lead in europe.
Eh, Nicaea was really the turning point. It had imperial sponsorship wherein Christians were facing heavy and aggressive official persecution not thirty years prior. Unified and standardized what had become a fragmented faith with bitter infighting across the Mediterranean. Laid the foundation for the Constantian dynasty, of which every subsequent emperor (and Constantine himself, at the very end) was Christian with the exception of Julian. 380 was more of a de jure decision of what was already de facto, especially in the East.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 9:26 pm to L.A.
Uhhh.. I see Historyfacts.com.. and NOT History.com.. Which I had originally associated with the History channel.
Since I never heard of this History Facts.com.. I have to wonder and evaluate how actually factual they are...
Since I never heard of this History Facts.com.. I have to wonder and evaluate how actually factual they are...
Posted on 7/26/26 at 9:31 pm to Zendog
quote:
It's not History.com
That's what I said.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 9:35 pm to L.A.
I’ll take the three years active ministry of Jesus over a pedophile prophet. I have no idea what historyfacts.com is? Never heard of it.,
This post was edited on 7/26/26 at 9:38 pm
Posted on 7/26/26 at 10:02 pm to L.A.
I think it’s absolutely retarded to state things in CE or BCE and the dividing point is still the birth of Jesus.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 10:09 pm to Kafka
I remember something similar but it may have Time magazine. I believe they had St. Paul 1, Muhammad 2, and Jesus 3.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 10:34 pm to Azkiger
quote:
So the new testament is fine, but not a new new testament?
Yes. The New Testament is based on Jesus Christ, the Son of God. He was part of the Trinity, making Jesus God Himself.
The "new new testament" is based on a human. Jesus said, "Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these." Notice there is no mention of it being okay to sexually abuse them.
Thus, any "testament" that contradicts the message of a divine Jesus and allows the rape of children cannot be considered "fine."
Posted on 7/27/26 at 5:10 am to Lucky_Stryke
quote:
I answered it directly
You didn't answer why a near complete revision of an objective moral code is allowable once but not twice.
And you also, laughably, pointed out that Mohammed was a pedophile. So what? If God's objective moral code says thats okay who are you to disagree? Your own moral code says God can drown millions of children and thats perfectly righteous so you're not really in a position to cast stones.
Posted on 7/27/26 at 5:13 am to TenWheelsForJesus
quote:
Yes. The New Testament is based on Jesus Christ, the Son of God. He was part of the Trinity, making Jesus God Himself.
Not according to the Jews or the Muslims.
quote:
Jesus said, "Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these." Notice there is no mention of it being okay to sexually abuse them.
Or drowning them like he did in Noah's flood.
Posted on 7/27/26 at 6:56 am to L.A.
I can think of a lot of things missing but anyone who uses BCE and CE is not a real academic and doesn’t deserve to be making lists about important events.
Using BCE and CE verses BC and AD just shows one’s ignorance of history.
Using BCE and CE verses BC and AD just shows one’s ignorance of history.
Popular
Back to top


0








