re: Hey Democrats, if Kilmar Garcia isn’t MS-13, why does he have MS-13 tattooed on his hand?

quote:

---

Muh processes and procedures

---

This is the primary argument, though. When you really look at it.

We are a nation of laws, and those are dealt with using legal processes and procedures. Nobody cares for MS 13.
They care about the constitution.

I’m sure the Supreme Court doesn’t “support” MS-13. They make decisions regarding legal issues.

quote:

---

If the admin wants to have the prior order rescinded, just bring him back and have the hearing and then deport him. Case closed.

---

No need

quote:

---

We are a nation of laws, and those are dealt with using legal processes and procedures.

---

When it comes to Trump you people violated every law and procedure on the book in attempting to prevent him from running for President

You are two faced

That imbecile Van Halen dude went ahead and JUMPED like a dumbass. And I will bet 5 dollars he brought that nerdy dad shirt for the MS-13 gang banger to wear.

quote:

---

The illegality is always present until rectified

---

OK, then please walk us through the rectification process, as you see it.

Many of us aren't aware of all of the relevant facts. You can help there.

The nature of the "error" is administrative in that, while he qualifies for deportation, El Salvador is the wrong place to send him. He was supposed to be deported somewhere else.

What is the exact reason why he was not supposed to be deported to his home country of El Salvador? Personal safety reasons, because a rival gang Barrio 18 would do him harm? I don't know for sure, I'm asking.

If the administrative decision to NOT deport him to his home country of El Salvador was made for personal safety reasons, then, this admin error is arguably cured because he is in the safe custody of CECOT in his home country. He is alive and well in CECOT, as we have seen in recent photos.

At this point, I don't see how there is a legal requirement to cure this Administrative error any further by actually bringing him back to the USA for an additional Administrative Hearing. If that hearing would adjudicate whether he could be sent back to his home country with his personal safety reasonably provided for, then, it seems to me that this could be done without his presence here in the USA, and it will be a very brief Admin hearing, given the fact that he's alive and well back in his home country.

Can you help me understand this matter, if I'm confused about something, Counsel SFP?

You contend that an Administrative Error demands to be cured. Let's say that I agree with you. I contend that this error is already cured, because this MS13 gang member is back in his home country and confined in a place that provides reasonable protection of his personal safety.

Well the admin says they made a mistake. Fix the mistake. Follow the legal process. Deport if necessary.

quote:

---

The illegality is always present until rectified

---

Wasn't illegal

Blammo. Rectified.

quote:

---

Well the admin says they made a mistake

---

False

quote:

---

Well the admin says they made a mistake. Fix the mistake. Follow the legal process. Deport if necessary.

---

Do you know the exact nature of the mistake? What was the underlying rationale for this admin decision to designate someplace else other than his home country for deportation?

If you can't answer that, you aren't fully prepared to discuss.

quote:

---

The illegality is always present until rectified

---

The fact that an El Salvadoran citizen is in an El Salvadoran jail and is, in fact, a criminal in his own country, seems to over shadow an administrative hearing in a foreign country.

It's not the responsibility of El Salvador to rectify American immigration "mistakes"

Regardless of the manor in which he arrived in El Salvador, they now have one of their criminals in one of their prisons. Why would they release him?

Would we do the same in a similar situation? Release a criminal to return to France for an administrative hearing on deportation, when we already have him in our custody?

Of course not. That's idiotic to even contemplate.