- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Here’s Why the Era of Lawless Leftist Judges is Likely Ending Soon
Posted on 4/19/25 at 8:26 pm to ChineseBandit58
Posted on 4/19/25 at 8:26 pm to ChineseBandit58
Anyone who understands the context of the 14th Amendment understands that “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” language was meant to prevent the anchor baby phenomenon.
3
Posted on 4/19/25 at 8:32 pm to Riverside
SloFlo has been too busy breaking up trailer park marriages to bother with reading anything seminal like the Constitution
Posted on 4/19/25 at 8:54 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It may not mean they take no action
If they were going to take no action they would have denied the emergency application. I have been following SCOTUS closely for the last few years and these national injunctions have been irritating them, especially Thomas and Alito. Also Roberts is a stickler on standing. Go through all the plaintiffs in the three cases and most of them lack standing, it is basic law that a party cannot assert rights of third parties.
On the other hand there are 3 justices, Jackson, Kegan, and Sotomayor who I believe are fine with what is happening in the lower courts and would have denied the application.
Therefor it will come down to the three justices Trump appointed to decide the outcome of the case. And I believe that they will side with Thomas and Alito to severely cut back on these national injuctions.
Posted on 4/19/25 at 9:00 pm to VOR
quote:
Many of the so-called “leftist judges” are actually conservative Republicans(some appointed by Trump.
They’ve decided to apply the law honestly. You guys just don’t like the result. Trump is over-reaching and ignoring the law. If he followed proper
Procedure he may very well succeed in deporting the bad guys…
Why do you fools still believe in santa? Left/Right, Rep, Dem? Gimme a frickin break. They all REEK of swamp. And they are all supporting it because he is biting into ALL of their grafts and scams. When will you morons understand this, without radical change in this country we are FUCT. We spend 2T more year than we make. Grow up and quit being **** arse tribals and realize they are all out to frick us. You people are cheering for your destruction... SAD
Posted on 4/19/25 at 9:03 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
In recent years, liberal activists have shopped lawsuits in strategically chosen jurisdictions where they know they’ll find a hack judge
Posted on 4/19/25 at 9:08 pm to SlowFlowPro
Please give just one example of illegal actions the administration has done towards the aliens. I will wait.
This post was edited on 4/19/25 at 9:18 pm
Posted on 4/19/25 at 10:57 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:
There is no way the current 'drop a kid across the line and get free stuff for the entire family forever' shite was ever the intent of any constitutional amendment. No other civilized country falls for this shite.
Ok, so do conservatives want the constitution interpreted purely by the text as written, or interpreted for today's day and age? Textualism or purposivism?
Let's pick one and not change it to suit our ideology as we please.
Posted on 4/20/25 at 5:55 am to SlowFlowPro
You never fail to show how stupid you are, it really is amazing to watch you step on your dick all the time, A fricking 5 yr year old can recognize whats happening in this country, Your just another fricked up liberal!
Posted on 4/20/25 at 6:24 am to duckblind56
quote:
quote:
SlowFlowPro
Okay, now I got it. I ask a few days ago who SFP was and now it is very evident who the idiot is and why he is considered the dumbest poster on here
Your a quick learner!!! Lol
Posted on 4/20/25 at 6:49 am to lake chuck fan
quote:Uh, Chuck?
Your a quick learner!!! Lol
Posted on 4/20/25 at 6:59 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
sympathetic to the Trump administration
They should be after the landslide election.
America is tired of the Democrats and their lying, cheating, underhanded bullshite.
Posted on 4/20/25 at 7:01 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
In recent years, liberal activists have filed lawsuits in strategically chosen jurisdictions where they know they’ll find a sympathetic judge.
This is a significant problem …. Coordinated forum shopping should be outlawed.
Posted on 4/20/25 at 7:05 am to Bass Tiger
I think they'll end up compromising on birthright citizenship. It will be ended by the Supreme Court, but, everyone who's obtained it up to the ruling date will get to keep it. From there on only anyone born with 1 US citizen parent will get to have it.
US citizen men finna be swimming in foreign cooch.
US citizen men finna be swimming in foreign cooch.
Posted on 4/20/25 at 7:07 am to SlowFlowPro
Again...hey girl....probably Mindy mcnew....you are a joke with your prog stances...nobody takes you serious at all on here you do know that right? Yet...you eat up the attention. A real attorney wouldn't have time to beco.e an activist for the left on here.
Posted on 4/20/25 at 7:09 am to cadillacattack
Anyone with a brain who has watched what they are doing knows that they are out of bounds here...itbisnt even close.
Posted on 4/20/25 at 7:10 am to The Torch
I still can't believe suburban white women calling g themselves Christians support the evil democrats
Posted on 4/20/25 at 7:12 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:This is what liberals and hell, lawyers in general do.
There is no way the current 'drop a kid across the line and get free stuff for the entire family forever' shite was ever the intent of any constitutional amendment. No other civilized country falls for this shite.
They take language and just bastardize it beyond all recognition.
There's not a person walking the planet now OR EVER, who honestly thinks the writers of the 14th meant that anyone who could drag their pregnant arse across the border would have an insta-citizen.
But, because the writers couldn't foresee just how shameless leftists of their future would be, they didn't add a "ok now, for you fricktards in the back" clause.
Posted on 4/20/25 at 7:16 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Congress can't override Constitutional rights in the Constitution.
That is the argument before the court, its not specifically clear as written.
Regarding federal judges, the supreme court is and should be very threatened by it. In effect we now have 100s of supreme courts throughout the country, there really is no need for a US Supreme Court.
Posted on 4/20/25 at 7:20 am to Mandtgr47
quote:
suburban white women calling g themselves Christians support the evil democrats
Because they watch The View, CNN and MSNBC all day.
Posted on 4/20/25 at 7:27 am to TigerFanatic99
quote:
Ok, so do conservatives want the constitution interpreted purely by the text as written, or interpreted for today's day and age? Textualism or purposivism?
Let's pick one and not change it to suit our ideology as we please.
THIS. I'm a conservative; therefore, I want the law followed as written...therefore, I'm a textualist. Roe v Wade was the perfect example of pretending what the law SHOULD be just because you disagree with it.
FWIW, I think Birthright Citizenship will be a close one. There are good arguments on both sides. "I don't like anchor babies (which I don't)," is not an argument.
This post was edited on 4/20/25 at 1:34 pm
Page 2 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News