- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 6/9/17 at 12:55 am to BBONDS25
quote:
Is it a tax law question? That's what I do.
Well I got about a million of those!
It was something about these current political topics, I'll try to find it.
Posted on 6/9/17 at 12:55 am to BBONDS25
quote:You have to establish that, but investigate until you turn over all the rocks, yes.
So do you think there should be an investigation into collusion?
quote:There is no leak with Comey. Get over it. Even if you thought it was illegal there would be no investigation since there is no dispute on facts.
Is that basis greater than an admitted leaker being investigated for leaking?
Posted on 6/9/17 at 12:57 am to Cali 4 LSU
Ok. My rate on tax law is 500 an hour. My rate on trump is free. If you can combine the two we can work out a deal!!
Posted on 6/9/17 at 1:00 am to mmcgrath
There is no leak with Comey? He admitted to leaking. You support an investigation into a collusion claim when the ic and the FBI director has said there wasn't any collusion. When Diane friecking Feinstein said here wasn't any collusion. Yet you say that should be looked at over someone who has admitted to leaking?
I am not talking about legality. Collusion isn't illegal. Leaking may or may not be. You want an investigation into collusion with zero evidence so you can "turn over all the rocks". However an investigation into an admitted leaker isn't warranted?
Am I hearing you correctly???
Shame.
I am not talking about legality. Collusion isn't illegal. Leaking may or may not be. You want an investigation into collusion with zero evidence so you can "turn over all the rocks". However an investigation into an admitted leaker isn't warranted?
Am I hearing you correctly???
Shame.
Posted on 6/9/17 at 1:05 am to JuiceTerry
quote:
Same thing applies to anonymous sources. If the info is favorable, they're fine. I just think we need to all come to a consensus, and I'll abide by it. I do believe
I'm not principled enough to take a hard stance. I like to judge on case by case. If I think they help, good. If I think they are bad, then they are.
Posted on 6/9/17 at 1:07 am to JuiceTerry
quote:
SHe's talking about me referring his obstruction question to you
FIFY
Posted on 6/9/17 at 1:08 am to mmcgrath
quote:
Comey didn't share anything he didn't have the rights to.
Maybe Comey wasn't the only one with "rights" in this case.
Posted on 6/9/17 at 1:17 am to mmcgrath
quote:
There is no leak with Comey.
Uhhh, Comey described the leak himself!
James Comey admits he leaked to a friend
Posted on 6/9/17 at 1:20 am to mmcgrath
quote:
You have to establish that, but investigate until you turn over all the rocks, yes.
How many rocks do you need to turn over 360 or twice 720 plus degrees until you are satisfied? Or is this a crime in your eyes and enough rocks will need to be turned over until you find a criminal to fit the crime?
Posted on 6/9/17 at 1:23 am to Cali 4 LSU
Thank you. I am so confused. Comey isn't a leaker (even though he admitted leaking). Trump colluded (even though the ic the FBI director and Dianne Feinstein said he didn't).
Posted on 6/9/17 at 5:16 am to Y.A. Tittle
I love the aggression. Hit them back, twice as hard as they hit you.
Posted on 6/9/17 at 5:26 am to Cali 4 LSU
LMAO
Posted on 6/9/17 at 7:49 am to Cali 4 LSU
quote:How is it a "leak" when he is sharing his side of the story?
Uhhh, Comey described the leak himself!
Posted on 6/9/17 at 7:51 am to beastieboys
quote:
Nothing. Washington Whistleblower Protection Act protects him.
Blowing the whistle on what, exactly? The made up narrative that just blew up in your face?
LOL
Posted on 6/9/17 at 7:53 am to montanagator
quote:
What's illegal about leaking his own unclassified notes?
They aren't his, they belong to the FBI as work product.
Now that doesn't mean that leaking them is illegal, that would need more investigating then I have done on the subject at this point, but there is zero doubt that the memos do NOT belong to James Comey, that's just the way it works in government service.
And also, the WH is making the point that if he leaked this, what else did he leak as FBI Director?
Posted on 6/9/17 at 7:55 am to Cali 4 LSU
He's been a prosecutor for years and he went through his law professor friend. I'm pretty sure that they would make sure that no crime was committed beforehand.
Guess everyone here has a law degree though.
Guess everyone here has a law degree though.
Posted on 6/9/17 at 7:57 am to Wildcat In Germany
quote:
He's been a prosecutor for years and he went through his law professor friend. I'm pretty sure that they would make sure that no crime was committed beforehand.
Guess everyone here has a law degree though.
I have a law degree , and was a criminal investigator for my entire career. You don't think lawyers make mistakes OR intentionally violate the law?
Posted on 6/9/17 at 8:00 am to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:As a public document that isn't classified, it is a public document. Plus it only documents a private meeting with Trump that was in no way a part of official government business. One that the President lied about in an effort to smear Comey.
They aren't his, they belong to the FBI as work product
Posted on 6/9/17 at 8:00 am to Cali 4 LSU
This is a ridiculous PR move by Trump. Saying that he will sue does play well with his simpleton base, like when he said he would sue the NYT. But if he pushes this forward, it's gonna backfire big time.
Page 6 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News