- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Geraldo on Fox just stated that Trump Admin plans to file complaints with The DOJ & IG
Posted on 6/9/17 at 12:23 am to Cali 4 LSU
Posted on 6/9/17 at 12:23 am to Cali 4 LSU
I think he could have gone to a judge to try and invoke it, but there wasn't much chance of that. So instead, his administration "took the honest, high road" and let Comey testify unmolested. PR, basically.
2
Posted on 6/9/17 at 12:23 am to JuiceTerry
quote:
JuiceTerry
MELT
Posted on 6/9/17 at 12:24 am to BBONDS25
quote:So now you are calling for an investigation into a leak that doesn't exist?
We can't know if that's all that was leaked until we investigate?
Posted on 6/9/17 at 12:25 am to JuiceTerry
What I find funny, bud. Is over the past week I have pointed out time and again how even if everything the left alleges trump did he did...it wasn't illegal. That entire time I was told how conviction of an actual crime isn't important.
Yet here you are. Parsing the code trying to prove an actual crime wasn't committed.
Yet here you are. Parsing the code trying to prove an actual crime wasn't committed.
Posted on 6/9/17 at 12:26 am to mmcgrath
Are you for an investigation into collusion that doesn't exist???
The fact you failed to see what I was going for there is sad.
The fact you failed to see what I was going for there is sad.
This post was edited on 6/9/17 at 12:27 am
Posted on 6/9/17 at 12:26 am to Cali 4 LSU
quote:
Geraldo on Fox just stated that Trump Admin plans to file complaints
quote:
file complaints
quote:
complaints
I'm sure Comey is shaking in his boots.
Posted on 6/9/17 at 12:29 am to mmcgrath
There is far more evidence for Comey being a leaker...since he, you know, admitted it, than there is if trump collusion.
Yet you scoff at an investigation into Comey leaks and support one for collusion.
You have outted yourself.
Shame.
Yet you scoff at an investigation into Comey leaks and support one for collusion.
You have outted yourself.
Shame.
This post was edited on 6/9/17 at 12:31 am
Posted on 6/9/17 at 12:30 am to BBONDS25
I'm not following you. Which actual crime? I'm just reading articles and discussing all of this in a civil tone. I'm all ears.
Posted on 6/9/17 at 12:32 am to JuiceTerry
Comey is being accused of crimes by legal experts. He is being defended by other legal experts. Your position is, as I understand it, that Comey is all good if he didn't commit a crime. You don't hold Trump to the same standard. Why?
This post was edited on 6/9/17 at 12:33 am
Posted on 6/9/17 at 12:39 am to BBONDS25
quote:Flynn probably did. It is possible that other people on the campaign / in the administration did. Trump seems to want to keep it covered up because he is a paranoid nutjob.
Comey is being accused of crimes by legal experts. He is being defended by other legal experts. Your position is, as I understand it, that Comey is all good if he didn't commit a crime. You don't hold Trump to the same standard. Why?
Posted on 6/9/17 at 12:40 am to JuiceTerry
quote:
I think he could have gone to a judge to try and invoke it, but there wasn't much chance of that. So instead, his administration "took the honest, high road" and let Comey testify unmolested. PR, basically.
But he could have, indeed, invoked it still? So I guess that solves the issue of whether he could still invoke EP in relation to Comey's memos.
Posted on 6/9/17 at 12:41 am to mmcgrath
So just so I understand. You scoff at an investigation of an admitted leaker, but support an investigation into collusion with zero evidence. Am I understanding your stance?
Posted on 6/9/17 at 12:42 am to BBONDS25
quote:
BBONDS25
I'm supposed to ask you something but I can't remember what it is. Somebody from one of these threads referred me to you...
Posted on 6/9/17 at 12:44 am to BBONDS25
Trump is all good if he didn't commit a crime. I've never said otherwise, and as a matter of fact have gone on record saying that he wouldn't be caught up in anything, but some of his campaign team would. We'll see. I could be wrong as hell again.
I started a thread earlier asking if there will ever be a consensus on leaking and anonymous sources. Because as it is now, leaks only matter when people don't like the info. Trump has expressed his love for wikileaks numerous times. Why? Because the info was damaging to his opponent.
Same thing applies to anonymous sources. If the info is favorable, they're fine. I just think we need to all come to a consensus, and I'll abide by it. I do believe Comey was smart enough to leave himself several outs in this situation, but what do I know?
I started a thread earlier asking if there will ever be a consensus on leaking and anonymous sources. Because as it is now, leaks only matter when people don't like the info. Trump has expressed his love for wikileaks numerous times. Why? Because the info was damaging to his opponent.
Same thing applies to anonymous sources. If the info is favorable, they're fine. I just think we need to all come to a consensus, and I'll abide by it. I do believe Comey was smart enough to leave himself several outs in this situation, but what do I know?
Posted on 6/9/17 at 12:44 am to Cali 4 LSU
wish I could help. Is it a cali question? I grew up there. Is it a tax law question? That's what I do. If it's a trump question...you probably don't want to ask me. I mostly just like messing with the posters here on that stuff. This post was edited on 6/9/17 at 12:46 am
Posted on 6/9/17 at 12:44 am to BBONDS25
quote:
So just so I understand. You scoff at an investigation of an admitted leaker, but support an investigation into collusion with zero evidence. Am I understanding your stance?
Comey didn't share anything he didn't have the rights to.
The intelligence investigation is into Russian interference in the election and attempts to subvert members of the Trump campaign. There is plenty of evidence for that.
Posted on 6/9/17 at 12:45 am to JuiceTerry
So do you think there should be an investigation into collusion? If so...based on what? Is that basis greater than an admitted leaker being investigated for leaking?
Posted on 6/9/17 at 12:46 am to BBONDS25
He's talking about me referring his obstruction question to you
Posted on 6/9/17 at 12:47 am to JuiceTerry
Dang. What a bummer. I'm tired of that convo!
Posted on 6/9/17 at 12:54 am to BBONDS25
It's all above my pay grade. I think they have some stuff on Flynn, possibly Manafort, and possibly Sessions, now. I don't know if any charges will come of it. As for Comey being an admitted leaker, sounds like people are already "investigating", and everybody is playing politics there, too. I've read a few things saying it's not illegal, but others disagree. We'll see what happens.
Page 5 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News