re: Fulton county election office raided by fbi

quote:

---

what crimes they're alleging from 2020 aren't dead due to the SOL running last November

---

Would Fulton county indicting and arresting Trump years later not be an extension of any crimes the county committed during the 2020 election?

quote:

---

I would imagine that behavior was done prior to January 28th, 2021.

---

sure! Biden and Cumala were all about uncovering voter fraud in relation to the 2020 steal.

Oh lawd Trump's gonna get a third term isn't he?

quote:

---

it is at least possible to get a conviction with a Georgia jury.

---

Depends on where it is within Georgia.


A few years back a judge sequestered a batch of ballots that an election supervisor pointed to as being suspicious.

She had worked elections for over 20 years.

She swore that she observed hundreds of mail in ballots that were never folded... An impossibility if they were legitimate.

Another supervisor observed ballots that had an ink spot that showed up on the same location on each and every ballot. They had obviously been copied using a copy machine. Each ballot showed the same flaw.

Anyway, the judge ordered that the ballots be placed in a warehouse and be guarded by deputies.

One weekend, the warehouse was found with the doors wide open and no deputies present. The judge ordered an explanation but was never given any serious answers.

To think that the records are going to still contain voter fraud evidence at this point is lame.

The fact that this SlowFlow guy has been shitting up the thread for 11 pages means they are absolutely over the target. Imagine arguing statute of limitations for treason.

“Guys gotta drop the treason charges. Statute of limitations ran out” lmao what a fricking pedantic retard.

This guy is either a shill, a bot, or just a bad faith actor. No way he can be this stupid.

quote:

---

BTW, you were not really serious here, right?
---
It's your dots to connect.

---

It's not hard. You just don't like the result.

quote:

---

Sorry then. I thought I read somewhere that RICO when dealing with Treason/Conspiracy had no SOL. My bad if so.

---

What does a divorce court lawyer know about RICO? Lol.

quote:

---

I am just chiming in to say, that it is at least possible to get a conviction with a Georgia jury.

---

Well, let me explain my position.

I'm 100% sure that fraud happened in the 2020 election. And the reason I am 100% sure is that fraud happens every election. On both sides. It probably always has. And yes, there is video evidence of fraud.

But the real question is whether fraud happened to the degree that it influenced the election. Gave states to Biden that Trump actually won.

I'm a lot less confident that that happened, with two possible (though still unlikely) exceptions.

Here's why: Trump actually didn't win the 2016 election. Clinton lost it. And what I mean by that is that those states that Trump "miraculously flipped" in 2016—Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan—he didn't really flip them. That's not what happened.

What happened is that the percentage of Democrats who voted for Jill Stein doubled over the average in those states. In other words, about twice as many Democrats in those states cast protest votes against Hillary Clinton as usual. And it was pretty exact—I'm going from memory, but as I recall, if you took the number of people who voted for Stein and cut it in half, the result was almost exactly Trump's margin of victory, in all three states. It's very clear what happened...people didn't favor Trump in those states so much as they rejected Clinton and cast protest votes.

And without those swing states (and Arizona as well), Trump would have lost in 2016.

Now the Democratic Party noticed this, of course, and that's why they engaged in legal maneuvering to get the Green Party kicked off the ballot in those states. Two of those three didn't have Jill Stein running in 2020, and they also kicked them off in Arizona for good measure.

And low and behold, Trump won Pennsylvania, Arizona, and Wisconsin with Jill Stein on the ballot and he lost them without her on the ballot, in two cases by margins that were completely predictable going by the previous comparison. He lost Michigan even though she stayed on the ballot there in 2020, by—I think—a 2% margin. Still, the inference to the best explanation remains that the process in those states didn't involve large scale or even significant-scale tampering. Much more likely, the Democratic Party used the courts to put their thumb on the scale and "suppress Democracy," and it worked.

And this is why the 1 cm deep analysis of MAGA populists, "'Muh 81 million votes. That proves it was a fake election," makes no sense.

POTUS elections aren't won by total votes. They are won at the state level.

So when you check the number of votes cast in Arizona, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin between 2016 and 2020, you don't see what you would expect to see with massive fraud. For example, in Pennsylvania Biden's total votes did go up 18%...but Trump's went up 14%. The net difference is almost exactly the percentage that protest votes syphoned off in 2016. Same in Wisconsin. Biden up 18%, Trump up 15%. The difference was mostly Stein not being on the ballot and other protest votes not happening (write-ins, Libertarian Party, etc).

It doesn't seem likely at all to me that that was so perfectly engineered that it gave Biden the state without being more obvious. Especially when there's a much more likely explanation (the one already given above). There's virtually zero chance that that happened without an extremely high degree of collusion and organization, and the chances that someone was able to pull off that degree of organization is very low.

But the two exceptions to my reasoning are, possibly...Georgia and Arizona.

Those states were the only two swing states from 2016 that were in the top 10 states in terms of increasing total votes between 2016 and 2020 and the net differences were significant. 11% in Arizona and 14% in Georgia. And those outlier increases hold even when you control for protest votes, etc.

But even that only results in the Democratic candidate making up 3.5 points in Arizona and 4 points in Georgia, which is completely organically possible. PLUS, since it doesn't look like any significant tampering took place in the three northern states mentioned, the theory that only Georgia and Arizona were tampered with doesn't make sense. Even if Trump had won both states, he still would have lost, 276-262. He would have had to have had at least one of the other three to win.

So...

If they are ever going to find evidence of voter fraud significant enough to flip a state, I can believe that they will find it in Georgia (or possibly Arizona). That's plausible to me if it exists. But I'm not at all 100% convinced that it exists, and it also wouldn't prove that Trump won the election. Even with Georgia, Trump still loses.

The election tampering IMO was what happened right out in the open. Getting candidates strategically kicked off the ballot in certain states.

And none of that addresses the SOL issues or the fact that any evidence that could be destroyed certainly has been by now. It's like the Epstein files. Any of that evidence that really incriminated anyone powerful was run through a shredder 20 years ago.

quote:

---

Depends on where it is within Georgia.

---

It would probably need to be in the federal district over Fulton County, as all of the alleged criminal behavior in the purported conspiracy is likely to be contained within that district.