Favorite team:Boise State 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:1023
Registered on:7/27/2022
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
How many times has he done that? Again, haaland is phenomenal. Kane has a bag that is much more diverse. There's zero arguing that.

And, there shouldn't be. Age gap, history with multiple positions and responsibilities.

They are different. They don't move the same, they don't operate the same during matches.

FYI, go to YouTube and search Haalands account. Their trip to the western clothing store in dallas is phenomenal.
Even the broadcast said haaland doesn't score outside a certain area. Kane can score at will, outside the box. Again, haaland is phenomenal. He does not have the depth of Kane.
I'd never disparage Haaland. He's incredible. He is nowhere as complete as Kane. Kanes winner against the Congo is a prime example. Maybe 3-5 dudes can do that. Haaland isn't one of them.

Kane is the most complete player in the world. He has an intense amount of world class goals. Stacked with assists.

Haaland is excellent, but Kane clears him by a lot with overall skill.

Haaland, even mentioned today, is a box thief. Kane clears that easily.
It entirely rooted in anti capitalism and oppressed vs. Oppressor ideology. Once that takes hold, it's pretty difficult to reason with them.

It's borderline Atlas shrugged in real life.
Dan golman just lost his primary. He's one of the absolute worst in Congress. The guy that beat him, is even worse.

Pretty sure goldman lost because he's a jew. He's going to have a lot of time on his hands with all that Levis money his family has. Goodbye!
This england team is the best they've produced in decades. I don't want to see us lose to the english.

I'm very content on getting knocked out at 16, by anyone other than the Redcoats.

Go broncos. Go tigers. Hope neither of us ever finds ourself south of town with drones flying around.

That rhymes.
That's fair. However, under what circumstance would we be able to:
1) send people to get the dust
2) send nuclear scientists to oversee removal
3) remove any uranium
4) verify they aren't enriching
5) they even let people in the country to begin with.

I'll just opine, again, nothing is going to be enforceable at any level while the IRGC is in control and they can move hundreds of launchers within range of Hormuz.

It's simply not going to be enforceable.
The primary goal was getting the uranium, "nuclear dust". That is not going to occur now, or 60 days or ever, unless the IRGC is destroyed. We spent weeks and weeks BSing with them, over nothing. We could have bombed and struck way more IRGC locations.

Hope the Iranians can finish it. Someway.
Everything he listed is high probability. This is not a good deal. Awful.
Disaster if those terms are accurate. Now, have to listen to Trump take a victory lap on an unenforceable agreement. Theyll dig deeper down, where our bombs can't go. Build their missiles and get right back to enrichment.

Theyll never allow nuclear uranium to leave Iran, and they sure won't be letting anybody in to take a look. Ever.

The very second our navy leaves the Iranian area, they'll be back to doing what they've always done and there will be zero ability to enforce or oversee any of their nuclear program.

Massive L. Iran signs a worthless agreement that can't be enforced and now they'll be pumping out missiles and buying defense systems for the next year.

Somewhere, deep down, I hope the civilians have access to firearms and go about regime change.

If not, I feel sad for them. Sold a bill of goods, lost 40k+ in protests and now left with an even more aggressive IRGC.

Brutal.
With the arabs and turks interfering because of multiple reasons, it's becoming a mess.

UAE had been fine, considering they have a ton to lose, but the Sauds are frustrating. And it's Haj season, which makes it even more difficult with them.

There is zero incentive to making a shitty MOU with those savages.

Bomb them and arm them or the uranium is staying in Iran for a long time.

There's nothing to spin if Iran keeps their uranium.

re: Official US/Israel vs Iran war thread

Posted by Bronco11 on 5/24/26 at 1:17 pm to
Jack posiebic is performing borderline felatio over this. Some of these people, man.

Anyways, there's not going to be an agreement or deal because that uranium is never leaving Iran without intervention.

Trump's just appeasing the arabs and exhausting everything. Or at least I hope so, because the rumored deal is horrible.
There is absolutely no chance they will give up the uranium willingly. They have made that crystal clear. Over and over again.
It's not that the war is ending, it'll never end. It's the manner in which we may be leaving.
So 60 more days of the last 6 weeks on repeat? That's a no-go. Then what? We start bombing again in the summer? Nope. After the midterms? Maybe, but Iran will have ramped up a lot by then.